Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
General Discussion: The Weapon - by Ginger 2 hours ago.
General Discussion: The Weapon - by Damaso Marte 4 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Kansas Physician Confirms Howard Report - by TradeName 5 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Kansas Physician Confirms Howard Report - by TradeName 6 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Kansas Physician Confirms Howard Report - by TradeName 6 hours ago.
General Discussion: The Weapon - by Herlock Sholmes 9 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (10 posts)
General Discussion: The Weapon - (4 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Kansas Physician Confirms Howard Report - (3 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - (1 posts)
Ripper Notes: Status of Ripper Notes? - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Suspects > Barnett, Joseph

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-02-2014, 03:46 PM
sahlandilbaz sahlandilbaz is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
Default Hop picking season and knife

Would it be suspicious if a policeman asks what is that knife for?
It was hop picking season and chapman was going kent
Do check for the hop knife, it is bloody deadly
And edward stanley, from kent.
Chapmans lover around that time, could he be the guy with kent horse symbol?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-04-2014, 03:02 AM
miss marple miss marple is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 763
Default

You don't use a knife to pick hops. You twist the hop with your fingers, to remove it from the vine.
Most East End men would have knives, even a penknife, it was a useful tool.

Miss Marple
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-04-2014, 07:13 PM
sahlandilbaz sahlandilbaz is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
Default

I was talking about a possible good reason to show a policeman a big knife and use an excuse about it
And you cant do field work without knives.
Hop dressing and picking needed them too.
I hate this board most of the time. All this non sense undermining and weak psyche of its people. Always feeling awkward and poor when facing new stuff.
Sometimes i think this ripper **** needs a manifesto about blockheads like yourselves.
What is to be expected, what is the proper way of reading/handling ideas etc.
You guys read read read , and stop at some point like it is done and solved.
That is your minds limit.
Stop preventing people and putting a lid on every idea.
This is a thing NOT solved, NOt done, you are here because of this.
There are and will be things overlooked, missed, not understood at those times.
We are searching for these, not for rules or books, or police reports and it is useless beyond some point to get in deep with them.
We have all the time in the world, we have lightning fast searching abilities, we have serial killer profiling knowledge and looking to a catalog of bios of people involved till their death etc.
I pity most of the time likes of you for being a stereotype of a clogged mind.
It is so sad to see with all this self confidence wiithout zero knowledge about field work like this post of yours. You are not one but many, and i dont get what is your purpose. Fame? Tame thepeople? Feel intelligent? I post last on 2008 and after six years i forgot sbout people like you and did a mistakeagain. And what happens? Clogger trolls attack in an instant. Why man why?
Agree or disagree about an idea, what will be the purpose if you are not adding something or showing some real thing against it? Just type a little message and you feel confident again. All stones are in place and brain is comfortable.

Im begging for some help on these mesaages above, did you noticed that no one gave a damn?
Interesting isnt it?
A possible suspect, we have his bio in our hands, i cannot look at it ,and thats it.
Who am i to declare a suspect? Who isnt?
Again why are you guys here? Why you are reading peoples messages? Why are you looking again and again? If abberline has the ability of ourselves, im sure he would be reading 1888 and onwards bios. Who did what, who died where, who disappeared, who got lost or as he said got promoted or became famous for us to look high to find him?
But this happens.
Sad.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-04-2014, 07:22 PM
sahlandilbaz sahlandilbaz is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
Default

And looking other way when we have barnett? It amazes me.
If i was like you people, i could be attacking all the people who offers another suspect or a helping hand in murders.
And also what we should do looking with profiling , the first one and the last one.
We cant even agree on which one is the first.
First one is showing us motive, meaning and method.
Last one offers errors, haste in action, an excuse to stop , or fear of getting caught because of something everybody and we overlook.
Green river killer showed us they can stop for nearly a decade after killing and lead a normal life.
So please if i got deleted look in to james walkers son and bare in mind i was right about barnett.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-04-2014, 07:35 PM
sahlandilbaz sahlandilbaz is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
Default

And please stop looking possible occupations as butcher, cobbler and classic old time explanations.
Now we know soldiers,police, people kill animals when under age, people exposed to violence ,abuse, beating as a child, raped, forced to do steal, kill has interest in murder, possibly greater tendency, with interest comes knowledge. After puberty comes muscle power and technique.
And as a person attended to autopsies if i want to cut a person , i could deliver a very good job probably. So acaretaker in a hospital, mortician, could be the one.
Barnett, i will haunt you in hell. Where you are from.
My interest is in that sentence actually.
I hate him for his sample, being the first, beign the leader and such an object of fantasy fear and violence. We must solve this.together or individually. We must solve with good evidence. We must. No matter how long it has been, you cant get away. We must destroy his image and sample, what cames to mind when someone first thinks about him. Being never caught.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-04-2014, 07:40 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sahlandilbaz View Post
And please stop looking possible occupations as butcher, cobbler and classic old time explanations.
Now we know soldiers,police, people kill animals when under age, people exposed to violence ,abuse, beating as a child, raped, forced to do steal, kill has interest in murder, possibly greater tendency, with interest comes knowledge. After puberty comes muscle power and technique.
And as a person attended to autopsies if i want to cut a person , i could deliver a very good job probably. So acaretaker in a hospital, mortician, could be the one.
Barnett, i will haunt you in hell. Where you are from.
My interest is in that sentence actually.
I hate him for his sample, being the first, beign the leader and such an object of fantasy fear and violence. We must solve this.together or individually. We must solve with good evidence. We must. No matter how long it has been, you cant get away. We must destroy his image and sample, what cames to mind when someone first thinks about him. Being never caught.
I am really sorry but I found that very hard to follow, are you saying Barnett was the man?
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-06-2014, 11:07 AM
miss marple miss marple is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 763
Default

'' We must destroy his image and sample'' What? !!!!!!!!


Miss Marple
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-06-2014, 11:15 AM
DRoy DRoy is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 695
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUT View Post
I am really sorry but I found that very hard to follow, are you saying Barnett was the man?
GUT,

Not only has Sahlandilbaz figured out who it was (Yes Barnett obviously!), but why he did it and how we all have missed it all these years. Geez, do I ever feel dumb now.

Cheers
DRoy
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-06-2014, 11:44 AM
miss marple miss marple is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 763
Default

I wish Sahlandilbaz would tell us what his theory is about Barnett, that is different from what we already know, instead of being oblique.


Miss Marple
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-06-2014, 12:22 PM
MayBea MayBea is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 695
Default

Why would he be treated differently if he was specific?

Quote:
Originally Posted by miss marple View Post
'' We must destroy his image and sample'' What? !!!!!!!!
By sample, he probably means example or even his representative segment of the population. The rest is self-explanatory.

Lots of people here believe Barnett did it and lots of people here have moral outrage and are motivated by it.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.