Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Torso Killings: torso maps - by Sam Flynn 4 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: torso maps - by RockySullivan 17 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: torso maps - by Sam Flynn 48 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: If Mrs. Maxwell Didn't See Mary Who Did She See? - by Sam Flynn 59 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: torso maps - by RockySullivan 1 hour and 6 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: If Mrs. Maxwell Didn't See Mary Who Did She See? - by Abby Normal 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (38 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: If Mrs. Maxwell Didn't See Mary Who Did She See? - (19 posts)
Torso Killings: torso maps - (8 posts)
General Discussion: Masonic and the number 39. - (7 posts)
Research Related: Henry Kelly - (5 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Suspects > Hutchinson, George

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1831  
Old 08-18-2015, 06:49 AM
Dane_F Dane_F is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJA View Post
We have five women murdered,seemingly with no motive.

They are penniless,with one exception.

The murderer displays remarkable dissecting skills.

The chances are that he is in a well paid position.

Who is likely hunting who!

Ever considered a police cover up!

Hutchinson's story is possibly part of that.
Are you saying the women were actually trying to find JTR or blackmail him in some way and that was the reason for their murder and coverup?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1832  
Old 08-18-2015, 06:57 AM
Bridewell Bridewell is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bottesford, Leicestershire
Posts: 3,664
Default

Quote:
Ever considered a police cover up!
Of the Jack the Ripper murders? No.
__________________
Regards, Bridewell.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1833  
Old 09-14-2015, 08:57 AM
Ben Ben is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,666
Default

Quote:
“The first thing I would say is that we have to be very careful when taking expert opinion as the end of the matter.”
Not just expert opinion, Tecs; expect knowledge and insight into many more cases than we’re likely to know about. It’s fine on one level to reject all that, but who or what do we supplant it with – ourselves? Jack the Ripper was not a “spree killer”; he was a serial mutilating murderer of prostitutes, and therefore not particularly unique in the annuls of serial crime. We don’t know how long his “reign” lasted, but several critical factors that made such a “reign” possible for more modern offenders - such as transport to travel further afield and the means of disposing of the bodies - were probably not available to the Whitechapel murder. We also don’t know that Mary Kelly was the last “ripper” murder. There is no reason, in my opinion, to think he was any different from all the other known mutilating serial killers, who were sexually motivated.

All the best,
Ben
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1834  
Old 09-14-2015, 08:59 AM
Ben Ben is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,666
Default

Quote:
“It doesn't need to be common. The Whitechapel murders were unique, opportunistic and motiveless.
The crimes of Burke and Hare were unique, opportunistic and motiveless.”
Burke and Hare “motiveless”??

Are you sure you’ve read up on that case, Jon?

Burke and Hare had the extremely clear, extremely well-known motive of murdering people and supplying their bodies to Edinburgh medical school in exchange for money. It’s difficult to get more motiveful than that.

A motive doesn’t have to be “something directly associated with the victim” to be clear and defined.

Quote:
“I'm not defending the theory by any means, merely pointing out it cannot be so readily dismissed, the perpetrator was after all unbalanced.”
Well, dismissed as highly improbable, as opposed to impossible.

The problem I find with this area of study is that not enough consideration is accorded to precedent. If all, or nearly all, mutilating serial murderers have been sexually motivated, isn’t it the safest assumption that this mutilating serial murderer also belonged in that category?

One only has to contemplate the appalling injuries suffered by Mary Kelly to appreciate what nonsense the organs-for-money theory is.

Regards,
Ben
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1835  
Old 09-14-2015, 09:07 AM
Ben Ben is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,666
Default

As for the video of the Bray lamp, it is unlikely that a film would be radically different to the effect produced on the human eye, although should anyone doubt me I'm quite sure the nearest 500 candle power lamp won't prove too difficult to locate! It might be worth pointing out again that the lamp depicted in the film was considerably brighter than any affixed to a wall in 1888 Dorset Street, and was viewed/filmed from a a few feet away, as opposed to the 125 feet (thanks once again, Jon!) that separated Miller's Court entrance from the corner of Dorset Street.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1836  
Old 09-14-2015, 03:13 PM
Wickerman Wickerman is online now
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben View Post
Burke and Hare “motiveless”??

Are you sure you’ve read up on that case, Jon?
Why did you edit out the line which provided context?

Lets read it complete..
Quote:
It doesn't need to be common. The Whitechapel murders were unique, opportunistic and motiveless.
The crimes of Burke and Hare were unique, opportunistic and motiveless.

In this context 'motive' is not something directly associated with the victim, like love, hate, revenge, or a mugging, etc.
Like I explained in bold, motive = love, hate, revenge or mugging. Neither the Whitechapel murders or Burke & Hare were the result of those motives.


Quote:
One only has to contemplate the appalling injuries suffered by Mary Kelly to appreciate what nonsense the organs-for-money theory is.
It seems you are missing the point.
Anyone can commit those kind of murders if under the erroneous impression that the organs have a monetary value and a market.
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1837  
Old 09-15-2015, 02:55 AM
Ben Ben is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,666
Default

Quote:
Like I explained in bold, motive = love, hate, revenge or mugging. Neither the Whitechapel murders or Burke & Hare were the result of those motives.
I'm afraid I'm still not with you at all here, Jon.

You cite "mugging" as an example of a motive, but why do people mug? To obtain money - just so with Burke and Hare, who killed people and delivered their bodies to Dr. Knox in exchange for money. My point is that the overwhelmingly vast majority of serial killers are not motivated by financial gain, but rather personal (and usually sexual) gratification. It is reasonable, therefore, to conclude that Jack the Ripper probably belonged in this vast majority camp, as opposed to being a statistical anomaly.

Quote:
Anyone can commit those kind of murders if under the erroneous impression that the organs have a monetary value and a market
It doesn't matter if the impression was erroneous or correct. If he was organ-harvesting in the hope - naive or otherwise - of trading them in for cash, how would that explain the extensive mutilations inflicted on Kelly's corpse which had nothing to do with the extraction of any organ?

Regards,
Ben
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.