Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Motive, Method and Madness: Time after Time: Did JtR have a watch? - by Batman 51 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson? - by Wolf Vanderlinden 59 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson? - by Wolf Vanderlinden 1 hour and 2 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Time after Time: Did JtR have a watch? - by DJA 2 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Time after Time: Did JtR have a watch? - by Simon Wood 3 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Time after Time: Did JtR have a watch? - by jerryd 4 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Motive, Method and Madness: Time after Time: Did JtR have a watch? - (11 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson? - (9 posts)
Torso Killings: JtR failed amputation. Torso killer was successful. - (2 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Victims > Mary Jane Kelly

View Poll Results: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim?
Yes 67 82.72%
No 9 11.11%
Undecided 5 6.17%
Voters: 81. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #811  
Old 11-13-2018, 12:33 AM
Trevor Marriott Trevor Marriott is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Varqm View Post
So in conclusion as both Nichol's and Chapman's bodies were sent to the same mortuary,same mortuary attendant,,as in Nichol's case,no organs were taken illegally from the mortuary in Chapman's case.But in 1888 they did not have a proper mortuary and rules not to undress/wash the body until the doctor arrived,which the inmate (Nichols) and nurses (Chapman) and the inspectors in charge of the bodies naturally were not aware of.

Even Coles and Mckenzie were also brought to the same mortuary and no organs were taken illegally.

----
Coles and McKenzie and Nicholls did not have their abdomens ripped open to the extent that organs could be removed un-noticed and the killer blamed as was the case with Chapman and Eddowes.

Finally on the subject of organs for research, what main organ is only found in females? The answer is the female reproductive organ (uterus and fallopian tubes), so that makes it an organ that would be highly sought after for research, and that is exactly what was removed from Chapman. The uterus on its own was removed from Eddowes. That indicates to me that they were removed by two different persons using two different procedures to extract them at two different mortuaries

www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #812  
Old 11-13-2018, 04:16 AM
Batman Batman is online now
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Coles and McKenzie and Nicholls did not have their abdomens ripped open to the extent that organs could be removed un-noticed and the killer blamed as was the case with Chapman and Eddowes.

Finally on the subject of organs for research, what main organ is only found in females? The answer is the female reproductive organ (uterus and fallopian tubes), so that makes it an organ that would be highly sought after for research, and that is exactly what was removed from Chapman. The uterus on its own was removed from Eddowes. That indicates to me that they were removed by two different persons using two different procedures to extract them at two different mortuaries

www.trevormarriott.co.uk
You are 56 years behind the times there Trevor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatomy_Act_1832
__________________
Bona fide canonical and then some.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #813  
Old 11-13-2018, 04:27 AM
Trevor Marriott Trevor Marriott is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman View Post
You are 56 years behind the times there Trevor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatomy_Act_1832
And you havent been keeping up with the posts on this thread. because I have referred to the Anatomy act many times.

www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #814  
Old 11-13-2018, 04:33 AM
Batman Batman is online now
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
And you havent been keeping up with the posts on this thread. because I have referred to the Anatomy act many times.
By 1888 students of medicine had access to tissue and organs.

What that act effectively meant was that a lot of poor people and people who were without families, such as homeless, were used a lot more for medical scientific research, legally. Over the years various groups petitioned against it for reasons such as these, however, in the end, it seems enough people donate their bodies to science, but between legally being able to use a homeless person's dead body and those who gave their bodies to research, 1888 medical students did not have a shortage of organs and tissue to work on.
__________________
Bona fide canonical and then some.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #815  
Old 11-13-2018, 10:12 AM
Elamarna Elamarna is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: South london
Posts: 4,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Here we go again !


Go check out my new updated research into Miter Sq and the times and you will see that in fact the killer had no more than 5 mins max with the victim from walking into the square to making good his escape.

www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Sorry Trevor, you do not prove that at all. True you make an argument for it, but that is far different from proving the time the killer had.
The argument is not without some merit, however it really all depends on how we interpret the evidence and how much credence we give to the times quoted as being anything like synchronized.


Steve

Last edited by Elamarna : 11-13-2018 at 10:40 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #816  
Old 11-13-2018, 10:40 AM
Varqm Varqm is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Coles and McKenzie and Nicholls did not have their abdomens ripped open to the extent that organs could be removed un-noticed and the killer blamed as was the case with Chapman and Eddowes.

Finally on the subject of organs for research, what main organ is only found in females? The answer is the female reproductive organ (uterus and fallopian tubes), so that makes it an organ that would be highly sought after for research, and that is exactly what was removed from Chapman. The uterus on its own was removed from Eddowes. That indicates to me that they were removed by two different persons using two different procedures to extract them at two different mortuaries

www.trevormarriott.co.uk
There was only one killer who ripped abdomens that we know of, Jack.There was only one incident/victim then in the history of Whitechapel Workhouse
mortuary where the abdomen was ripped,Chapman.So this was the only time the "organ harvesters" made money?

The researchers had better options.The Anatomy Act opened up for research bodies of dead people who died from old age,diseases,and those murdered,intact bodies which would be best for research.

An "alarm" was raised when they undressed\clean the body,any organ taking would also raised the alarm but this was never in doubt and not an issue.It was clear there was no illegal organ taking.


-----
__________________
Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced, otherwise people run back to the hills,no towns).
M. Pacana
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #817  
Old 11-13-2018, 12:23 PM
Varqm Varqm is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 598
Default

And Dr. Frederick Gordon Brown.Eddowes:
[Coroner] Would the parts removed be of any use for professional purposes? - None whatever.

So what was the point in taking organs,can't make money,can't use it for research.There were intact bodies available.Give it up Trevor.

----
__________________
Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced, otherwise people run back to the hills,no towns).
M. Pacana
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #818  
Old 11-13-2018, 12:25 PM
Trevor Marriott Trevor Marriott is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elamarna View Post
Sorry Trevor, you do not prove that at all. True you make an argument for it, but that is far different from proving the time the killer had.
The argument is not without some merit, however it really all depends on how we interpret the evidence and how much credence we give to the times quoted as being anything like synchronized.


Steve
Steve
I fully agree that we can only work with the times we are left with and fully accept that we do not know if all the time pieces referred to were in sync.

However we have nothing to prove any of them were not and so we are left with them to use with any calculation we choose to make. They were stated in inquest testimony, and in my current calculations I have allowed for time discrepancies and still arrive at times which in my opinion as good as dam suggest that the killer could have not had time to do all that he is purported to have done.

But itís nice to see you see some merit in the results

www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #819  
Old 11-13-2018, 12:29 PM
Trevor Marriott Trevor Marriott is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Varqm View Post
And Dr. Frederick Gordon Brown.Eddowes:
[Coroner] Would the parts removed be of any use for professional purposes? - None whatever.

So what was the point in taking organs,can't make money,can't use it for research.There were intact bodies available.Give it up Trevor.

----
If the organs were taken as I suggest they would not be sold on but simply used for research by whatever medical establishment the person who took them
was from

Maybe it is you that should give it up

www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #820  
Old 11-13-2018, 12:33 PM
Trevor Marriott Trevor Marriott is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman View Post
By 1888 students of medicine had access to tissue and organs.

What that act effectively meant was that a lot of poor people and people who were without families, such as homeless, were used a lot more for medical scientific research, legally. Over the years various groups petitioned against it for reasons such as these, however, in the end, it seems enough people donate their bodies to science, but between legally being able to use a homeless person's dead body and those who gave their bodies to research, 1888 medical students did not have a shortage of organs and tissue to work on.
There was always a shortage of organs for research especially specific female organs.

www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.