Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Motive, Method and Madness: Geoprofile of Jack the Ripper reveals Tabram and Nichols connection. - by MrBarnett 26 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Did Mary Kelly meet the Bethnal Green Botherer? - by Wickerman 45 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: JtR failed amputation. Torso killer was successful. - by Batman 3 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Did Mary Kelly meet the Bethnal Green Botherer? - by Wickerman 4 hours ago.
Torso Killings: JtR failed amputation. Torso killer was successful. - by Trevor Marriott 4 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Geoprofile of Jack the Ripper reveals Tabram and Nichols connection. - by Sam Flynn 5 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Motive, Method and Madness: Geoprofile of Jack the Ripper reveals Tabram and Nichols connection. - (91 posts)
Torso Killings: JtR failed amputation. Torso killer was successful. - (31 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: distances between kills.odd - (19 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Did Mary Kelly meet the Bethnal Green Botherer? - (11 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson? - (9 posts)
Shades of Whitechapel: The Christie Case - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Media > Books > Non-Fiction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-18-2018, 04:14 AM
Observer Observer is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
I dunno. It might give us some insight into Albert's medical history, to say nothing of the mother/son relationship, if she'd named it "Piddles".
Well he was feline a bit unwell as he stepped out into that back yard, and consequently into the history books.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 09-18-2018, 04:46 AM
ohrocky ohrocky is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 28
Default

This is very odd indeed.

A huge amount of research has been undertaken into the victims as demonstrated by the "Victims" section on these very forums. So I think we can conclude that the author has been extremely lazy in not checking the resources here (and at the "other place").

The victim that we probably know least about is MJK; but that certainly hasn't been for want of trying.

I have never read any demeaning comments about the victims and I've never seen them described as "ugly". We only have the mortuary photos after all.

The author is also quoted as saying “We glorify the Ripper….”. Who does? Where on earth has she got that nonsense from? She might. But nobody I have been in contact with or have read over decades has “glorified” the Ripper.

As for Ripperology having no respect for the victims well that is just complete bollocks. When I can I visit MJK's memorial on the anniversary of her murder. I have seen many others doing the same and the multitude of floral tributes left on each anniversary sinks the underlying premiss of this tome before it has even rolled off the printing press.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 09-18-2018, 04:57 AM
Observer Observer is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohrocky View Post
This is very odd indeed.

A huge amount of research has been undertaken into the victims as demonstrated by the "Victims" section on these very forums. So I think we can conclude that the author has been extremely lazy in not checking the resources here (and at the "other place").

The victim that we probably know least about is MJK; but that certainly hasn't been for want of trying.

I have never read any demeaning comments about the victims and I've never seen them described as "ugly". We only have the mortuary photos after all.

The author is also quoted as saying “We glorify the Ripper….”. Who does? Where on earth has she got that nonsense from? She might. But nobody I have been in contact with or have read over decades has “glorified” the Ripper.

As for Ripperology having no respect for the victims well that is just complete bollocks. When I can I visit MJK's memorial on the anniversary of her murder. I have seen many others doing the same and the multitude of floral tributes left on each anniversary sinks the underlying premiss of this tome before it has even rolled off the printing press.
See post 31
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 09-18-2018, 05:06 AM
Observer Observer is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry D View Post
Feminism was a mistake.
Now now. No sitting on the fence
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 09-18-2018, 05:42 AM
Elamarna Elamarna is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: South london
Posts: 4,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
Its a very relevant point Steve, because in the case of Polly and Annie, the only 2 we KNOW were soliciting, it makes sense that their killer posed as a client to get them somewhere dark. That he was likely unknown to them, a stranger. That their killer was opportunistic and, in the latter case, shown to have an obsession with female abdominal organs. It would show us that their killer learned from his first kill (poor venue) and then applied that knowledge to the second. Some form of madness would certainly be part of his makeup.

The point I'm making is that we would have a profile for the killer of the first 2 victims. Unless we can prove that the circumstances of the other 3 Canonicals were similar, the differences in their murders and the subsequent mutilations stand out as a sign that different killer(s) were likely at work.

The main objective to this line of thinking has been that people assume 2 or more murderers working at the same time in a small geographical area is unlikely. Forgetting of course the Torsos and other murders within the Unsolved File that do not match the Canonical Group.

If 3 of the Canonical Group may have been killed by someone other than the opportunistic killer, then the motives for those could be far different and potentially far more revealing about those killer(s).
If one is studying the case yez of course it is significant Michael. However i was talking from a moralistic point of view, which appears to be the view being taken by the author. That by saying they were working girls we are devaluing them, which is not the case, that was my point.

If there is new evidence to support the view that some were not working, that of course would be significant, time will tell
Its just gender politics being used to push a publication at present in my view.


Steve

Last edited by Elamarna : 09-18-2018 at 05:44 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 09-18-2018, 06:01 AM
Robert Robert is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,895
Default

Have a look at her Sept 15th tweet. The only part she disowns is the bit about the number of non-prostitutes.



https://twitter.com/HallieRubenhold?...Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 09-18-2018, 06:20 AM
Robert Robert is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,895
Default

The Telegraph has a paywall but anyone who wants to read the full article can do so :

http://www.jtrforums.com/showthread.php?t=28981&page=36
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 09-18-2018, 06:32 AM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elamarna View Post
If one is studying the case yez of course it is significant Michael. However i was talking from a moralistic point of view, which appears to be the view being taken by the author. That by saying they were working girls we are devaluing them, which is not the case, that was my point.

If there is new evidence to support the view that some were not working, that of course would be significant, time will tell
Its just gender politics being used to push a publication at present in my view.


Steve
bingo El.
lets hope she at least has done good research and discovers something new about the women.
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 09-18-2018, 06:39 AM
PaulB PaulB is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Observer View Post
amounts of time looking into the lives of the most obscure individuals connected to the case. Who wants to know the name of Albert Cadoches mothers cat?
Albert Cadoches mother had a cat! Wow, what colour was it?

Actually, I don't think anyone goes that far, although we did ascertain the colour of Diddles, but it's interesting to find out about these people so that they are more than just names.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 09-18-2018, 06:48 AM
PaulB PaulB is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBarnett View Post
I know who the SOTA lady is, Paul, but I have a problem with the use of the word 'abyss' so I use the name of her website to identify her (I seriously do have an issue with the term, and even more so with Jack London's view that the POA shouldn't have been allowed to breed.)

I'll scour my copy of the Mammoth in the hope of finding 'A ton' of examples of the use of the word 'ugly'.
I know you know her name, I just mentioned it in case other people didn't. Despite the fact that she has written a book about the victims in which she is quite nastily critical of Ripper authors, especially the early ones, and has the website, she doesn't know much about research or what sources there are or where they are located, so it is quite probable that she doesn't know what information writers had to work with. As for the Mammoth, Rubenhold highlighted somewhere the authors rather tactlessly say something along the lines of the victims no winning a beauty contest. As a historian, Rubenhold should judge people by the time in which they wrote, which was twenty years ago in the case of J&B. Perhaps she did judge them and found them crass for the time, or maybe she didn't take it into account.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.