Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - by PaulB 10 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - by Abby Normal 13 minutes ago.
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - by PaulB 18 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - by Sam Flynn 23 minutes ago.
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - by Abby Normal 25 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - by Abby Normal 28 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - (61 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (10 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - (7 posts)
General Discussion: Jack The Ripper and Venus - (7 posts)
Tumblety, Francis: Patterns of behavior and Tumblety - (1 posts)
Annie Chapman: AC and TOD - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Suspects > Hutchinson, George

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1201  
Old 08-12-2018, 06:52 AM
rjpalmer rjpalmer is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBarnett View Post
Maywood is a fascinating character is his own right. Seemingly a brothel-keeper as well as a drover...
Sounds like a chip off the ol' McCarthy.

I doubt Mary Kelly was a charity case. One of the oldest tricks in the book is to keep the 'renter' in 'arrears' as well as in alcohol.

McCarthy had his fingers in several pies and I'd say the odds are about 50/50 that Astrachan was a friend of his, come to check on a horse for the stable.

Not my solution to the mystery, mind you, but worth considering.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1202  
Old 08-12-2018, 08:08 AM
MrBarnett MrBarnett is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Romford
Posts: 1,572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjpalmer View Post
Sounds like a chip off the ol' McCarthy.

I doubt Mary Kelly was a charity case. One of the oldest tricks in the book is to keep the 'renter' in 'arrears' as well as in alcohol.

McCarthy had his fingers in several pies and I'd say the odds are about 50/50 that Astrachan was a friend of his, come to check on a horse for the stable.

Not my solution to the mystery, mind you, but worth considering.
Maywood was far dodgier than McCarthy by my reckoning.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1203  
Old 08-13-2018, 02:56 AM
Busy Beaver Busy Beaver is offline
Constable
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Lothian
Posts: 85
Default

The George Hutchinson, whom we think was The George Hutchison (toppy) had always kept to a belief that the murders were something to do with Royalty. Perhaps Astrakhan man was his description of a member of the Royal Family, as there is no way he was going to name any one and the member of the Royal Family who was implicated was in Scotland at the time.

What's left is who was the Man standing on the opposite side of Millar's Court??
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1204  
Old 08-13-2018, 10:24 AM
Varqm Varqm is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Beaver View Post
The George Hutchinson, whom we think was The George Hutchison (toppy) had always kept to a belief that the murders were something to do with Royalty. Perhaps Astrakhan man was his description of a member of the Royal Family, as there is no way he was going to name any one and the member of the Royal Family who was implicated was in Scotland at the time.

What's left is who was the Man standing on the opposite side of Millar's Court??

The killer trying to see if the coast was clear with a focus on Kelly.Lewis came at 2:30 AM, saw him, wait for things to settle down.Cox came at 3:00 AM
,again wait or both missed each other entirely. Around 4:00 AM (average of the doctors's estimated time of death or before 6:00 AM.- the furthest if I remember right, and 'Oh murder cry") he striked.He was able to wait since there was no PC-on-the-beat all through the late evening and early morning (he did not have anything to say during those crucial hours before the inquest) and the street was practically deserted.
The damn geezer wanted a parade.

Or a potential/returning client checking if some "unfortunate" was available.Cox was out since 1:00 AM. Kelly was very drunk (Cox) and asleep
with no indication otherwise.The rest of the Miller's court residents were trying to sleep or asleep and were expecting nobody.

- I do not believe it was an innocent bystander since there was no one/movement in the court (Lewis) to be looking at it intently.
Waiting as described by Lewis means/meant prior contact/knowledge.

----
__________________
Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced, otherwise people run back to the hills,no towns).
M. Pacana
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1205  
Old 08-13-2018, 11:08 AM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is online now
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 10,432
Default

Hello BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Beaver View Post
The George Hutchinson, whom we think was The George Hutchison (toppy) had always kept to a belief that the murders were something to do with Royalty.
That's what was claimed in Melvyn Fairclough's book, which was written after Stephen Knight's best-seller had put the Royal Conspiracy well and truly on the map. Fairclough's book is so untrustworthy that I even doubt the page numbering
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1206  
Old 08-14-2018, 12:55 AM
richardnunweek richardnunweek is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,291
Default

Hi.
Topping simply said it was more likely a member of the upper classes. and his man resembled Lord Randolph Churchill in appearance,
Question.
Was Toppings tale invented purely for the books publication?
Answer No.
Appeared on Radio mid 1970's some 18 years prior.
Fact
Somewhere out there, a TV Magazine exists, [ Radio Times ] featuring ''The man that saw jack'' .
I tries to trace it years back at Brighton University library ,[ with two members of my family] but with the time allotted me , it failed to materialise , because we only searched the front pages not the rear.?
Anyone with access , and patience, can surely find this article, the recording was aired one weekday around 8 pm.
It does , or at least did exist. it was my means to be able to listen to it , on the relevant date.
Regards Richard.

Last edited by richardnunweek : 08-14-2018 at 12:59 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1207  
Old 08-14-2018, 01:28 AM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is online now
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 10,432
Default

I sincerely doubt the Randolph Churchill bit, and suspect that he only got dragged into the matter because it suited Fairclough's agenda. I just can't see George making that comparison to his son Reg (Fairclough's source), as Churchill was a figure of the past; Winston, perhaps, Randolph no. It would be like me telling my son that someone resembled Harold Macmillan - utterly meaningless to a child of his generation.
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1208  
Old 08-14-2018, 03:47 AM
Michael W Richards Michael W Richards is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert St Devil View Post
[Aside: I'm aware that Lewis and Prater (who didnt claim any dialogue with Mary Jane) were called at the inquest, but I blv that had to do with "oh murder" more than anything else.]
I think the proximity to the murder site, and probability of actually having seen the exterior of Marys room that night were also relevant Robert. The way they described the "oh-murder" suggests a location of the call inside the courtyard, and we don't have any witnesses who claimed to be in there at that time, so for me anyway, they and Cox are THE most relevant statements here.
__________________
Michael Richards
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1209  
Old 08-14-2018, 10:42 AM
Premium Member
caz caz is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Devon UK
Posts: 6,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abby Normal View Post
But to me a glaring anomalie in his behaviour re him being reluctant to come forward because he dosnt want to get involved, is that once he does come forward-boy does he want to get involved! His story dosnt sound like someone with any reluctance at all-can be Ided, thought I saw him again, told a cop about it etc. etc. And then further involves himself by talking to the press and going on a walkabout with the cops! Not really the behaviour of a reluctant witness is it?
Hi Abby,

Catching up - slowly - with this thread. You are dead right: boy does he want to get involved when he finally shows up! But what can we take from this?

Would he have thrown caution to the wind in this way, if he was the ripper, intent on killing for as long as possible, undetected and unidentifiable?

Less is more, and if he was guilty I'd have thought he would have avoided saying any more than he absolutely had to, but just enough to give Abberline and co no reason to question his statement, his behaviour or his status as an innocent witness, one who'd be naturally wary in the circumstances in which he claimed to find himself, battling with his conscience but finally coming forward when his conscience won the day.

The fact that he talked to the press has always bothered me. It should be telling us something, but it wasn't the smartest thing to do if he had something enormous to hide and had not yet roused any police suspicions.

But what if he had told his story to a policeman on the Sunday, thinking he was doing his bit for Mary Kelly, but got the feeling he was not being taken seriously, or later believed the constable had not even passed on the details? Could this not have been the reason he went to the police station the following day, miffed that nothing appeared to have been done yet with his information? I mean, he could have cut out the middle man and gone straight to the cop shop over the weekend, but maybe he had assumed that telling a copper on the street and being reassured would suffice?

In these circumstances I could see Hutch talking to the press to make sure his information was not going to be ignored a second time.

Love,

Caz
X
__________________
"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov



Last edited by caz : 08-14-2018 at 10:44 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #1210  
Old 08-14-2018, 10:51 AM
Joshua Rogan Joshua Rogan is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,842
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardnunweek View Post
Hi.
Topping simply said it was more likely a member of the upper classes. and his man resembled Lord Randolph Churchill in appearance,
Question.
Was Toppings tale invented purely for the books publication?
Answer No.
Appeared on Radio mid 1970's some 18 years prior.
Fact
Somewhere out there, a TV Magazine exists, [ Radio Times ] featuring ''The man that saw jack'' .
I tries to trace it years back at Brighton University library ,[ with two members of my family] but with the time allotted me , it failed to materialise , because we only searched the front pages not the rear.?
Anyone with access , and patience, can surely find this article, the recording was aired one weekday around 8 pm.
It does , or at least did exist. it was my means to be able to listen to it , on the relevant date.
Regards Richard.
Was this the program that you have in mind, Richard?
Broadcast on Radio 4, 20:00 on 1st June 1972

https://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/37721b6d...392fa8b9fdc30f

"The Other Victorians

A ten-part series examining the hidden and darker aspects of Victorian life.
8: Who was Jack the Ripper? bv MICHELL RAPER
Compiled and introduced by MICHELL RAPER with the voices of BETTY BASKCOMB
DOUGLAS BLACKWELL. GERALD CROSS WILLIAM EEDLE. MARTIN FRIEND
OLWEN GRIFFITHS , LESLIE HERITAGE JOHN RUDDOCK , LEWIS STRINGER and MANNING WILSON
The series of gruesome murders committed by an unidentified psychopath in 1888 is perhaps the most notorious crime in British legal history. Among its most sensational features was the persistent rumour that the murderer was a highly placed aristocrat shielded by the police: and recently, and most sensationally of all. that he was the Duke of Clarence. eldest son of the Prince of Wales, later Edward VII , and therefore eventual heir to the English throne. When this unhappy Prince died in 1892 there was a well-orchestrated outpouring of grief: Hope of a people's heart - your promised king - and mine, .wrote Alfred Austin. But could he really have been Jack the Ripper? Producer HALLAM TENNYSON
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.