View Single Post
  #4301  
Old 02-23-2018, 01:10 PM
Iconoclast Iconoclast is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abby Normal View Post
isn't it obvious that a modern hoaxer saw the police report of listed items and screwed up-writing verbatim what was in the report?
I think you give yourself away when you start with the premise "Isn't it obvious".

No, it isn't obvious. It is one of at least two options:

1) Maybrick wrote it because it was true and it was coincidence (again!) that it was recorded in a similar fashion in the official list of Eddowes' possessions (her 'meagre possessions' as I think Ripper cliche likes to call them), or
2) A hoaxer in 1987 or later created a rather clever hoaxed Ripper journal identifying James Maybrick as Jack but (very very very very very very very) stupidly copied this line from Fido (or some other).

No, it isn't obvious at all.

Last edited by Iconoclast : 02-23-2018 at 01:20 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote