View Single Post
  #605  
Old 01-23-2018, 12:23 PM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
*
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,916
Default

It's amusing to read yet another speculative and unsupported theory produced for Mike's acquisition of a blank Victorian diary in 1992. We've gone, over the past year, from the bonkers and nonsensical to the more bonkers and nonsensical to the theoretically possible and now back to the (even more) bonkers and nonsensical. I don't think there is even any need for me to demonstrate why this latest theory is bonkers and nonsensical, it's self-explanatory, so I think we can ignore it as I somehow doubt we'll ever see it mentioned again.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote