View Single Post
  #8  
Old 12-02-2017, 05:52 AM
Wickerman Wickerman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post
I think less emphasis was placed on Allen as a suspect after his DNA failed to match the partial DNA on the envelope.
Thats what I read too, so they don't actually have the killer's DNA, they just assumed the envelope was licked by the killer. Normally it would be a reasonable assumption, but it is still not a fact.
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote