Originally Posted by Scott Nelson
But it is a "stretch."
As I've already said Scott, I don't think it is a 'stretch'.
I mean, if James Swanson believed that the book was sent directly by Anderson to Donald Swanson under cover of a letter dated December 1905 then, knowing that there was an inscription in the book, why wouldn't he have assumed that the inscription was written by Anderson?
What surely would
be a 'stretch' is any other
explanation for this. I noted that Simon didn't provide one, nor you. Fancy it?