Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Original Nightstalker-Unsolved

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ausgirl
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    That's mindblowing! I mean, in the grand scheme of things it's not going to solve the case or anything, but I remember reading the original thread where people were dissecting the audio. Some speculated that EAR/ONS made the call from a clinic or a hospital because they could hear a woman in the background calling for a doctor. Turns out it was a line from a movie!
    It's not yet clear (to my knowledge anyway) as to which end of the line the background dialogue was on, though - EAR's or the victim's - but at least that area of speculation has a definitive answer now.. very exciting!

    What's frustrating (but quite understandable) in this case, is that few people are willing to openly discuss suspects, as there's a chance the EAR is still alive and out there somewhere... If he is, I have little no doubt he'd be very computer-savvy and keeping an eye on discussions...I'm sure his ego would demand it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by Ausgirl View Post
    This has been one of my "pet" cases for the past several years, and I do haunt a few discussion sites - glad to find another venue, particularly here.

    Some exciting things that have come about relatively recently include the identification of background sounds in the "Gonna Kill You" call as being dialogue from the film "Breaking Up," which was airing the night of January 2, 1978, when the EAR telephoned the victim.

    It may only be a small detail, but in a case this old and frustrating.. well, people here would surely understand how exciting that might be.
    That's mindblowing! I mean, in the grand scheme of things it's not going to solve the case or anything, but I remember reading the original thread where people were dissecting the audio. Some speculated that EAR/ONS made the call from a clinic or a hospital because they could hear a woman in the background calling for a doctor. Turns out it was a line from a movie!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ausgirl
    replied
    This has been one of my "pet" cases for the past several years, and I do haunt a few discussion sites - glad to find another venue, particularly here.

    Some exciting things that have come about relatively recently include the identification of background sounds in the "Gonna Kill You" call as being dialogue from the film "Breaking Up," which was airing the night of January 2, 1978, when the EAR telephoned the victim.

    It may only be a small detail, but in a case this old and frustrating.. well, people here would surely understand how exciting that might be.

    Again on topic of telephones -- former case detective, Richard Shelby, said during a podcast that the EAR/ONS may have been tapping his victims' phone lines, as he was proven to have done on at least one occasion. This was during the attack were it was widely publicised that EAR had "cut the phone lines" -- but he'd actually done far more than that and in this podcast Shelby confirms that there was evidence of interference with the lines that likely meant the EAR was listening in on calls.

    Here's the podcast, rivetting stuff - if you can stand the heavy breathing of the host, which is gross:

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/dan-zup...chard-shelby-1

    Also, some sad news -- Michelle NcNamara, the true crime author who in recent years had helped to bring this case to greater public attention and who made popular the EAR's new moniker, "Golden State Killer" or "GSK" has recently 'passed away in her sleep', at only 46 years old.


    http://mashable.com/2016/04/22/miche.../#xUg.IEYtiZqD

    Also, the long-awaited film by Cameron Cloutier, "Bird with a Broken Wing", detailing the life of EAR's last known victim, Janelle Cruz, is apparently still in production (I was wondering...).

    Here's some recently released interviews Cloutier had with McNamara:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Cs4MjFETQA

    Part one ^ -- links to parts 2 through six will come up will come up on the sidebar to the right.
    Last edited by Ausgirl; 04-24-2016, 08:14 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Also known as the 'Baby Dick Killer', on account of his small manhood. Several of his victims attested to the attacker being poorly-endowed, and apparently one of his victims remained a virgin after the assault. A much more fitting moniker for this guy, in my opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pcdunn
    replied
    Hi, Abby: That's interesting, about Gacy. Sort of shedding the mask, and letting out "the beast", it seems. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Pcdunn View Post
    That is very spooky. I wonder if it is a sign of the guy having more than one personality? Or perhaps a way of "psyching" himself up to do the deeds.
    I think I've seen the documentary about this case, and the voice-mail message is very chilling, indeed.

    Given his organization, though, more likely he was a sociopath.
    Hi Pcdunn
    Not sure about the whole split personality thing.

    One of Gacys survivors said that the instant gacy had the handcuffs on him (the handcuff trick gacy used to employ to gain control of his victims) he changed instantly from a charming, fun friendly guy into some kind of snarling beast/ devil (or words to that effect) who started beating him and throwing him around.

    Amazingly the guy was still able to overpower gacy, get the key from him and get the handcuffs off!

    Serial killers are pretty much all sociopaths but I think the ones who act like ONS and Gacy have a huge amount of pent up anger as part of their deep seated motivation for killing.

    Leave a comment:


  • jason_c
    replied
    Originally posted by Dupplin Muir View Post
    My feeling is that the ONS moved abroad when DNA testing came in and he realised that the police had his profile. He wouldn't want to risk being identified if he was picked up for some minor offence.

    I also believe that he was ex-military, probably some kind of Special Forces, given his evident ability to select approach and exit routes, which seems beyond the skills of an average infantryman.

    I dont think DNA is/was taken for a minor offence.

    Ive been reading up on the case lately. Sure he could be special forces, he could just as likely be a guy with previous for breaking and entering, a man who had honed his "craft".

    Leave a comment:


  • Pcdunn
    replied
    Multiple personality disorder?

    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Hi RC
    I also heard that one surviving victim say that as he was terrorizing them he was walking around chanting something like "I'm going to kill them" over and over in a low, raspy,growling voice. Similar to the phone call he made to a victim in which he chanted "going to kill you" .
    That is very spooky. I wonder if it is a sign of the guy having more than one personality? Or perhaps a way of "psyching" himself up to do the deeds.
    I think I've seen the documentary about this case, and the voice-mail message is very chilling, indeed.

    Given his organization, though, more likely he was a sociopath.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dupplin Muir
    replied
    My feeling is that the ONS moved abroad when DNA testing came in and he realised that the police had his profile. He wouldn't want to risk being identified if he was picked up for some minor offence.

    I also believe that he was ex-military, probably some kind of Special Forces, given his evident ability to select approach and exit routes, which seems beyond the skills of an average infantryman.

    Leave a comment:


  • jason_c
    replied
    I believe the white German Shephard with one toe missing was only deemed as a possibility. It was by no means certain such a dog was owned by the killer. I think a dog of that breed and colour was seen near a couple of the homes the criminal targetted and at only one scene a dog print with three toes was found.

    Can someone confirm this?

    Leave a comment:


  • RivkahChaya
    replied
    Seriously. I happen to know there is no vet HIPAA like there is for humans. We regularly get cards in the mail addressed to our pets that say things like "Morgan, your fecal exam is due." I'm sure the police could have gone around to area vets inquiring about white GSDs with missing toes, and asking questions at parks and such. If the dog wasn't vaccinated, that could have been an "in." It's not a crime, but it is a violation, and some people manage to escalate the situation until it becomes a crime. It sounds like this is an easily-riled guy. If the police looked him up for not vaccinating his dog, and tried to confiscate it (not the usual course of action, but allowable by law), and were surly about it, they might get the guy shouting, and trying to grab the dog back, at which point they could arrest him for interfering with the police.

    Anything that lets them bring him in, and hold him for 24 hours is a foot in the door. A lot of major crimes are cracked on minor violations. Son of Sam was caught for getting a parking ticket, and Al Capone's original arrest was for tax evasion.

    White GSDs are around, but they are not that common, and they were even less common in the US at the time of the ONS.

    I'm really curious to what extent the police pursued this. It seems like such a promising lead.

    Does anyone know more about this?

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    One of the strangest things I read about the case is how he took his dog with him to some of the homes. Maybe it's just me that seems like a bizarre thing for a serial killer/rapist to do. It would be more of a hindrance than anything? Unless he was using it as a watchdog in case someone came into the house while he was doing his thing?
    .

    Yes, it was believed to be a white German Shepherd with a toe missing. I don't know how many clues the police need.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by sdreid View Post
    The profile, for whatever it's worth, says he started when he was about 26 which would mean he was born around 1950. If so, he could have been a Vietnam War veteran and if not must have been deffered, drew a high number in the lottery or was judged unfit for some reason.
    Yes, I have a hunch that he was probably ex-military.

    One of the strangest things I read about the case is how he took his dog with him to some of the homes. Maybe it's just me that seems like a bizarre thing for a serial killer/rapist to do. It would be more of a hindrance than anything? Unless he was using it as a watchdog in case someone came into the house while he was doing his thing?

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    The profile, for whatever it's worth, says he started when he was about 26 which would mean he was born around 1950. If so, he could have been a Vietnam War veteran and if not must have been deffered, drew a high number in the lottery or was judged unfit for some reason.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    *bump*

    Been getting into this case recently, after listening to the chilling voicemail he left one of his victims. Not for the faint-hearted: https://youtu.be/jdElYnd-xMo

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X