Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Queen Elizabeth II surpasses Queen Victoria's long reign

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rosella
    replied
    I'm sorry Mayerling. When I wrote that republicans might be on the move here, I meant in Oz, as Gut has explained.

    Even though there are republicans in Britain that would dearly love to see the monarchy abolished, I'm sure!

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Mayerling View Post
    I don't think the republican movement will catch on. The monarchy is such a tourist attraction to the British Isles, and it's historical significance is only possibly shared by the Spanish Bourbons (who currently also have a throne again). All of the other monarchies in Europe are from smaller countries, except (economically) Sweden, and (in terms of physical size) Norway.

    Jeff
    Pretty sure Rosella is talking Aus as I am. Sorry for any confusion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    I don't think the republican movement will catch on. The monarchy is such a tourist attraction to the British Isles, and it's historical significance is only possibly shared by the Spanish Bourbons (who currently also have a throne again). All of the other monarchies in Europe are from smaller countries, except (economically) Sweden, and (in terms of physical size) Norway.

    Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • Rosella
    replied
    Yes, Victoria was very self-centred and is probably popping her heavenly wings in frustration right now!

    Charles isn't exactly flavour of the month back in Britain either and Camilla's poll numbers are even worse. Are republicans on the move here really though, I've seen no figures to back it? It may be that the republican movement is scenting the Abbott government's demise and is hoping for a bipartisan republican debate with Shorten as PM and probably Malcolm Turnbull as opposition leader in Bill's first term. (I still don't think a Yes vote in a referendum would succeed because of the technical difficulties in getting any amendment to the Constitution through.)

    Leave a comment:


  • belinda
    replied
    No Victoria was actually a very jealous woman. She wouldn't like it

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Rosella View Post
    Yes, the old girl's passed her milestone. And done it without hiding away for decades like Victoria did. She's done her duty all her life and I take my hat off to her. I wouldn't be surprised if she lives as long as her mother. Poor Charles!

    Well done Elizabeth!
    I hope so.

    The Republican movement is on the rise again down here and Charles and Camilla could be just the boost they need whereas Will and Kate and little George are pretty popular.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rosella
    replied
    Yes, the old girl's passed her milestone. And done it without hiding away for decades like Victoria did. She's done her duty all her life and I take my hat off to her. I wouldn't be surprised if she lives as long as her mother. Poor Charles!

    Well done Elizabeth!

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by belinda View Post
    Victoria would not be amused
    Actually she'd probably be proud of her Descendant.

    Leave a comment:


  • belinda
    replied
    Victoria would not be amused

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Pcdunn View Post
    I heard about this. Congratulations to your Queen on doing better than her ancestor! May she continue to live long and prosper.
    Not much doubt about the prosper bit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pcdunn
    replied
    I heard about this. Congratulations to your Queen on doing better than her ancestor! May she continue to live long and prosper.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Long to Reign over us, God save the Queen.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    The wonders of the NHS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    I am sure we all wish the Queen the best on such a date for her current reign.

    Before Victoria, it was King George III who had the record (1760 - 1820), which remains (currently) the record for a male monarch - but George also was insane on and off, and permanently so after 1810, so one might wonder if a decade of being "Prince Regent" should be tacked onto King George IV.

    Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • RivkahChaya
    replied
    I went to an international school sponsored by the US and UK embassies in Moscow. We got a mix of UK and US holidays off. It happened to be the year of one of the queen's jubilees, I think silver, and the whole school got a day off.

    So, thanks, your Majesty, and mazel tov.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X