its no longer boring....shawlgate!!!

[pinkmoon]

I think we can use what Richard has just posted as good example why people shouldn't get carried away with half baked ideas when the defence of its ok it attracts a lot of newcomers to casebook it also puts a lot of members of who then end up leaving which is very sad.

[pinkmoon]

Hi..
I have posted for the last fifteen years on this subject[ Casebook], and been addicted for some 49 years [ minimum] but the case has gone nowhere,its getting nowhere . but the sublime ridiculous ...Its time I hung up my old worn gloves, and retired to the pensioner section of Ripperology.
Thanks for the good times, I shall not withdraw my membership. but will not contribute any more to this Site...until such time [ in my lifetime, hopefully]] it is proven beyond doubt who the killer was..
Thanks to all the people I have corresponded with en-route over the years.
Best regards , and fingers crossed.
Richard Nunweek.

Stay..... was very impressed with your posts about Maxwell

[Scott Nelson]

Don't do it Richard! It was Henry DeFries.

[richardnunweek]

Hi..
I have posted for the last fifteen years on this subject[ Casebook], and been addicted for some 49 years [ minimum] but the case has gone nowhere,its getting nowhere . but the sublime ridiculous ...Its time I hung up my old worn gloves, and retired to the pensioner section of Ripperology.
Thanks for the good times, I shall not withdraw my membership. but will not contribute any more to this Site...until such time [ in my lifetime, hopefully]] it is proven beyond doubt who the killer was..
Thanks to all the people I have corresponded with en-route over the years.
Best regards , and fingers crossed.
Richard Nunweek.

[pinkmoon]

And you know what that makes it with over 1/4 million views and 3,200 posts

Just wait till my books finished I'm just got to finish making a few more facts up and its ready I think the octopus angle will raise a few eyebrows as will the seventh cavalry angle but I'm not to sure how bigfoot will go down and people can't argue with the d.n.a results from the y fronts.

[GUT]

The debate still rages!!!!!!!!!

And you know what that makes it with over 1/4 million views and 3,200 posts

[pinkmoon]

The debate still rages!!!!!!!!!

[ajcol]

Ahhhhh......that's allright then - as I hadn't read about it in the gutter press, I was beginning to think it might not be true after all!

[GUT]

G'day aj

1 Has the Y-Front DNA testing been subjected to peer review?

Of course. Pinky asked me to have a sniff and see what I thought. And I'm hs peer [or is that queer I keep getting mixed up]

2 Is it likely to be?
3 If so, when?

Not applicable. Already done.

4 Were the samples taken from areas of semen staining?

Yes I sniffed the right spot.

5 Is there any truth in the rumour that a Gentlemen's Underwear Emporium/Bookstore/Confectioners/Toyshop/Badger Taming Establishment is to open shortly on the Thames Embankment? - we already know that a book is imminent!

Only if there's a quid in it.

[ajcol]

Y-Fronts authenticity?

Far be it from me, a mere layman and newcomer to these illustrious boards, to cast the first stone of doubt regarding the Y-Fronts, but I have some questions:

1 Has the Y-Front DNA testing been subjected to peer review?
2 Is it likely to be?
3 If so, when?
4 Were the samples taken from areas of semen staining?
5 Is there any truth in the rumour that a Gentlemen's Underwear Emporium/Bookstore/Confectioners/Toyshop/Badger Taming Establishment is to open shortly on the Thames Embankment? - we already know that a book is imminent!

During my exhaustive research (ie Google/Wikipaedia) I have discovered what I believe to be pertinent information, and I quote:

"Tight briefs have been blamed for negatively affecting semen analysis, since they may interfere with the cooling of the testes.[6] However, not all research has come to the same conclusion. A study in the October 1998 Journal of Urology, for example, concluded that underwear type is unlikely to have a significant effect on male fertility." (Wikipaedia)
"Briefs were first sold on January 19, 1935 by Coopers, Inc., in Chicago, Illinois." (Wikipaedia)
"In the UK, briefs were first sold in 1938." (Wikipaedia)

Can someone provide solid evidence to convince me before I jump onto the Anti-Y-Front bandwagon?

[pinkmoon]

Shawl gate is now getting boring,however we have a couple of new people posting in the diary threads which should be entertaining.

[pinkmoon]

Personally, I am wondering about the Jack The Ripper Lip Balm.

We have to remember that this book is not attempt to purely make money.

[Penhalion]

Personally, I am wondering about the Jack The Ripper Lip Balm.

[Steadmund Brand]

At that price I'm moving to Buffalo.

it's worth it!!, but I must warn you.. Summer is over.. almost SNOW TIME... not sure you Aussies could handle our winters (below 0 degrees F is not abnormal) .. then again if you do come here promise to leave the Vegemite at home!!!! YUCK

I will loan you my shawl if you get too cold.. just promise not to add any new stains too it buddy!!

Steadmund Brand--

[GUT]

I can get black jelly beans here for $1.29 per pound!!!! on sale. but still I did buy 2 pounds for under $3... for training purpose...only 2 years till the olympics

Steadmund Brand--

At that price I'm moving to Buffalo.