getting a bit boring again

[pinkmoon]

The real question has has bigfoot got the time to pose?

After my extensive research(I've read one book and watched a few videos on YouTube) I have come to the opinion that bigfoot is real check out the book "when roger met party" it's available on amazon and it is a modern day investigation to the Patterson gimlin film from 1967 it is carried out by Williams Munns who has nearly 50 years experience in movie special effects well worth a read.

[pinkmoon]

I get the feeling you are referring to me, as some of my theories seem far fetched, but I don’t think they are as bad as the suggestion that the elephant man was JTR

He did appear on the scence at the right time and he did live alone and quite possibly he might have acquired some medical knowledge also he would have had access to surgical knives but I think because he bares no resembelence to any of the eye witness accounts he should be ruled out purely on that.

[pinkmoon]

haha! Hasn't the time...

I remember some one posted a video on you tube of a gentleman who was in his hunting gear rifle in hand pistol strapped to thigh a few dozen dead deer around him he was recounting his bigfoot encounter and when asked why he didn't shoot it he replied "I would find it very hard to harm a living thing"

[pinkmoon]

Natasha you are n Pub Talk where, as in a pub, BS rules don't take it so seriously.

And re silence, if you look Pinky's off line and I answered above.

Wife had dragged me to bed actually but that's a different story all together.

[pinkmoon]

Yep

Just as I thought! Silence

Why don't you start doing sum investigating by way of new avenues of who done it, why he done it and think up your own suspect, instead of waiting for someone else to suggest something. Then perhaps you won't be bored with discussing the case.

Everything I have suggested has been speculative, I have said time and time again that I was not 100% on my theories, I suggested them to spark some debates that would perhaps lead to a new look at things.

I just see you hanging around looking to slag off people's theories, Pinkmoon. I don't mind joking about it (I have done so before) but I'm not deranged just because I'm thinking outside the box, remember fact is sometimes stranger then fiction.
I felt it would be a good way to bring up a theory that had never been suggested before, in doing so it may raise some good questions and might lead people to look at something that might have been missed in the evidence. Its easy to get complacent with what you already know, and that's the danger, people will not look at the evidence again when using the the same old theories. Introduce a new theory and people start to see old evidence in a new light, and maybe they may think up more plausible theories.

My dear Natasha,I've just come back on here this morning and I am a bit disappointed that you have accused me of having a go at you over your theories I have just had a look at the threads you have started and they all seem very reasonable to me.This thread was started as a joke because every now and again things do get a bit boring and I know by starting a thread like this it will normally end with a lot humorous postings normally referring to wife's and mother in laws but this time it looks like it's going to end in bigfoot jokes.

[pinkmoon]

I get the feeling you are referring to me, as some of my theories seem far fetched, but I don’t think they are as bad as the suggestion that the elephant man was JTR

My dear Natasha,my comment was not aimed at anyone in particular I don't know what your theories are but I would treat them with the greatest respect.

[TomTomKent]

I think nondescript is probably the right answer. The chances of proving any suspect have long passed, and an unknown face in the crowd is unfortunately a possibility we should consider.

Regards making things more lively podcasts tend to get people talking, so perhaps ask if anybody will team up with you to record a piece that will spark a debate. Or even throw out some topics in the forums.

[Sally]

Perhaps it's time to resurrect the little-credited contemporary theory that the Whitechapel Murders had been committed by deranged escaped zoo animals.....

That'd liven things up around here alright.

P.S. - I say little-credited, but I'd be more convinced by that than by a famous artist or nondescript carman.

[GUT]

haha! Hasn't the time...

The real question has has bigfoot got the time to pose?

[Beowulf]

Stuff this I'm going to see what's happening on the bigfoot forums it was quite interesting the other night a fellow who lives in a shack was saying that for the past twenty years he gets large ape like creatures in his backyard but he hasn't got time to buy a camcorder and film it.

haha! Hasn't the time...

[GUT]

Hi Gut

Ok ok

I won't take it seriously

Oh and BTW take Jacky as serious as you please just not "Pub Talk".

[GUT]

Thanks Gut

I just thought I would add my two cents, because people have thought my 'Murder What Murder' post seemed far fetched

G'day again Natasha

I think many people's posts are far fetched.

Funnily enough there is one poster here [who will remain nameless] who almost every time I read their post I think "Stop being so sensible and logical" except when they get on their "Pet" suspect. Likewise there is a poster whose pet suspect I think is likely but in my opinion they do an injustice by their twisted logic.

As I said don't take it personally. Especially in Pub Talk.

[Natasha]

Natasha you are n Pub Talk where, as in a pub, BS rules don't take it so seriously.

And re silence, if you look Pinky's off line and I answered above.

Hi Gut

Ok ok

I won't take it seriously

[Natasha]

G'day Natasha

I'm sure pink wasn't talking about you in particular and I know for a fact that wasn't.

Thanks Gut

I just thought I would add my two cents, because people have thought my 'Murder What Murder' post seemed far fetched

[GUT]

Yep

Just as I thought! Silence

Why don't you start doing sum investigating by way of new avenues of who done it, why he done it and think up your own suspect, instead of waiting for someone else to suggest something. Then perhaps you won't be bored with discussing the case.

Everything I have suggested has been speculative, I have said time and time again that I was not 100% on my theories, I suggested them to spark some debates that would perhaps lead to a new look at things.

I just see you hanging around looking to slag off people's theories, Pinkmoon. I don't mind joking about it (I have done so before) but I'm not deranged just because I'm thinking outside the box, remember fact is sometimes stranger then fiction.
I felt it would be a good way to bring up a theory that had never been suggested before, in doing so it may raise some good questions and might lead people to look at something that might have been missed in the evidence. Its easy to get complacent with what you already know, and that's the danger, people will not look at the evidence again when using the the same old theories. Introduce a new theory and people start to see old evidence in a new light, and maybe they may think up more plausible theories.

Natasha you are n Pub Talk where, as in a pub, BS rules don't take it so seriously.

And re silence, if you look Pinky's off line and I answered above.