Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Richard III & the Car Park

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Sally View Post
    Hi Errata

    Well yes, but knowing where it was amounts to very little. Excavation has provided a partially conjectural ground plan, for example, and doubtless other information about the actual monastery which was previously lost to knowledge - the 'rediscovery' of the monastery is important in its own right.

    'Richard' is the crowd puller though
    I was just sort of thinking of the average joe opinion. They start setting up the dig and say "we are looking for the Monastery." and some guy on the street says "Really? See the parking garage? Right there, about five feet down."

    I don't think we've lost anything since 1776, but before that, unless it's a mound city, we have what a Vietnam pilot of my acquaintance calls "An unacceptably high radius of uncertainty". It's not exactly lost, because we can typically narrow it down to state...

    And I don't even know how Egyptologists manage, because that stuff could be anywhere. I mean it's like Cleopatra's tomb picked up its foundations and just started running, freezing every time someone looks at it. Like some bizarre cross between "Hide and Seek" and "Red Light Green Light". I think it's in Cleveland now. I honestly do.
    The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Archaic View Post
      -Bury Richard III in Worksop??

      http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.u...ail/story.html

      Archaic
      [QUOTE=Monty;247063]Erm....no.[/QUOTE

      Hi Neil.

      Yeah, I didn't think so.

      I never even heard of Worksop before this article. But that seems to be the point with some of these efforts; trying to get themselves on the tourist map by way of King Richard's remains. I guess it's to be expected.

      Glad that (at least so far) nobody has suggested divvying up the skeleton- a jaw bone here, a pelvic bone there...

      Leicester makes the most sense to me.

      Cheers,
      Archaic

      Comment


      • Rare 1484 Gold Coin Found On Bosworth Field

        Pretty cool; they think this this Richard III gold coin may have been lost at the time of the 1485 battle.

        http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.u...ail/story.html

        Archaic

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Archaic View Post
          Pretty cool; they think this this Richard III gold coin may have been lost at the time of the 1485 battle.

          http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.u...ail/story.html

          Archaic
          I read this and started thinking about all of the ways change falls out of my pocket. Usually in movies when I put my feet up on the chair in front of me. And I started thinking "Gee I don't know why I never thought about it, but of course change would be falling out of their pockets while on horseback."

          And then I stopped, actually thought about that for a second, and started laughing really hard at myself.
          The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

          Comment


          • Leicester Buy Property for Richard III Center

            Apparently Leicester has bought the property for its future Richard III exhibit center:

            http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.u...ail/story.html

            Best regards,
            Archaic

            Comment


            • Does such an investment indicate that they are reasonably certain that the remains will be firmly identified as Richard's, I wonder?

              Could be embarrassing if they make big plans and then find that the bones won't play!!

              Phil H

              Comment


              • It was on the Radio news yesterday and as I went past the site yesterday, I notice the For Sale signs are still up.

                Yeah, I thought it too early unless they know something we don't. However knowing Leicester City Council it wouldn't surprise me if they do **** it up.

                That said, I welcome a new museum even if its not Richard. The history of the site itself warrants it.

                Monty


                PS the **** word rhymes with dock, not tuck.
                Monty

                https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

                Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

                http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

                Comment


                • Thanks Monty.

                  Comment


                  • A link to Current Archaeology for interest. You can also vote here for the 'Richard' excavation project if you wish which has been nominated in this year's CA awards.

                    http://www.archaeology.co.uk/

                    Comment


                    • Geo-Phys

                      Heres an article regarding the Geo-Phys techniques that were used to survey the archeological site. Pretty cool that they can make a 3-D computer model of it which the strata can be viewed from any angle.

                      http://www.melodika.net/index.php?op...4196&Itemid=50

                      Best regards,
                      Archaic

                      Comment


                      • http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-l...shire-20740276


                        Monty
                        Monty

                        https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

                        Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

                        http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

                        Comment


                        • Thanks, Monty. It'll be an extraordinary coincidence if the remains are not those of Richard III

                          Regards, Bridewell.
                          "It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins twisting facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts." Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (as Sherlock Holmes).

                          Comment


                          • http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/9...chard-III.html

                            Monty
                            Monty

                            https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

                            Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

                            http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

                            Comment


                            • Well, it will be a moment that will change the history books forever.

                              Prepare for:

                              * bookshops to be FULL of volumes of RIII
                              * a raft of new books on RIII in 2013/14
                              * a major exhibition somewhere (Leicester?)
                              * a big revival of interest in C15th
                              * LOTS of romantic novels featuring RIII - even more than at present (Alison Weir et al).

                              Phil H

                              Comment


                              • I'm wondering what (if anything) the information with-held from the public might be especially as, supposedly, it will be sufficient to identify him even if there is no successful DNA match. My money's on a signet ring.

                                Regards, Bridewell.
                                "It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins twisting facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts." Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (as Sherlock Holmes).

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X