As it turns out, the Ripper Cabal is real...it's just not who you thought it was

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Abby Normal
    Commissioner
    • Jun 2010
    • 11923

    #136
    Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View Post
    The new members may not get it, Ally, so for their benefit I looked up the first use of Cabal here on the Casebook Message Board.

    It was way back in March of 2008, in a thread called The New Vogue featuring:

    the Suspended Gideon Fell
    the Banned Cap'n Jack
    the Inactive Aspallek
    along with Smiling Dan Norder
    and a few survivors like Robert, Mike & Howie.

    But yes the poster who first spoke of the Cabal was .............drumroll...................

    ... the Suspended Mr Poster. Here is the post that launched a thousand tickets to nowhere when in reply to Dan he said:


    http://forum.casebook.org/showthread...=4806#post4806
    wasnt Gideon Fell --Stewart Evans in disguise?
    "Is all that we see or seem
    but a dream within a dream?"

    -Edgar Allan Poe


    "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
    quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

    -Frederick G. Abberline

    Comment

    • PaulB
      Superintendent
      • Jun 2010
      • 2218

      #137
      Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
      Hello Mr. Begg. Delighted so to do.

      Reason, itself, is objective. It admits of certain deductive inferences (Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Disjunctive Syllogism, etc); ways of calculating inductive inferences, and so on. Moreover, this canon of rationality is open to all, and able to be applied uniformly. In a word, it is "objective."

      Unfortunately, we, as human beings, ofttimes misapply reason. When forging a chain of, say, inductive reasoning, we allow weak links, redundant ones, and so on, to make up that chain. With this human element, the way that "reason" is applied is now tweaked to fit an individual in a specific set of circumstances. Hence, "subjective."

      Cheers.
      LC
      Hi Lynn
      That's what I thought you meant, but isn't that why we test those links as best we can with the materials at our disposal?

      Comment

      • Wolf Vanderlinden
        Sergeant
        • Feb 2008
        • 547

        #138
        wasnt Gideon Fell --Stewart Evans in disguise?
        Yes, he was.

        Wolf.

        Comment

        • lynn cates
          Commisioner
          • Aug 2009
          • 13841

          #139
          ought

          Hello Mr. Begg. Thanks.

          Well, we certainly ought to in order to be responsible members of the epistemic community.

          Cheers.
          LC

          Comment

          • Admin
            Administrator
            • Feb 2008
            • 226

            #140
            At this time we are making the decision to close the thread. We believe that everything that could be said has been said, and there is nothing further that needs to be added. Thank you.

            Comment

            Working...
            X