Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Leslie Van Houten should be released on parole

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by Magpie View Post
    And you still haven't answered my earlier question: Was Leslie lying when she repeatedly claimed that Bobby was not enthralled by Charlie, and that in fact it was Charlie who was desperate for Bobby to stick around?
    Repeadly??

    Well...

    The fact is that Bobby was a musician, had his own "harem" (including Leslie), and logically Manson did pay more attention to him than to Scramblehead.

    Add to this that there seemed to exist some kind of mutual attraction between them. And that's all Leslie said. Not repeatedly, because it's no more her bizness, and because she is seldom questioned about that.

    Fact is Bobby phoned Charlie from Hinman's residence...and you know why ? Because he didn't know what to do.
    Dear Charlie told him what to do.
    MURDER.

    And once again, lastly, Leslie said she saw Bobby "orally servicing" Manson.
    Not the reverse.
    And I don't care about them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Magpie
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    You're making a great mistake.
    It's up to you to be a Manson-freak, but it remains that he is behind all these murders.
    As soon as he slashed Hinman's face, Bobby had to kill him. For Hinman would have gone to the police.
    Hence Manson (to Bobby): "You know what to do."

    And the least a parole board should expect from a Manson follower is to be detached from Manson influence.

    Bobby is not.

    And that's the second time you've evaded the answer.

    I'll ask again slowly. Is Leslie Van Houten lying when she has repeatedly said that Bobby was not enthralled with Manson, but that Manson was desperate for Bobby to stay.

    Leave a comment:


  • Magpie
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    I

    Legal because she has the right to stand for parole.

    .
    And nobody's interfered with that right.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by Magpie View Post
    No, what Bobby has done is admit that he killed Hinman, that he is responisble for Hinman's death, that he knew what he was doing when he did it, and that he deserves to be in prison for it.

    And that, my friend, is accepting responsibility, not blaming the big bad Manson bogeyman for your wrongdoing.


    And I notice that you didn't include your muse among the people who admitted to being there.... Could that be because your repentent, good, strong, perfect woman has steadfastly refused to talk about the Hinman murder since she first admitting being there at her trial?

    And you still haven't answered my earlier question: Was Leslie lying when she repeatedly claimed that Bobby was not enthralled by Charlie, and that in fact it was Charlie who was desperate for Bobby to stick around?
    You're making a great mistake.
    It's up to you to be a Manson-freak, but it remains that he is behind all these murders.
    As soon as he slashed Hinman's face, Bobby had to kill him. For Hinman would have gone to the police.
    Hence Manson (to Bobby): "You know what to do."

    And the least a parole board should expect from a Manson follower is to be detached from Manson influence.

    Bobby is not.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by Magpie View Post
    Well, you started out making all sorts of rational or legalistic sounding claims to support your contention that a brutal murderer should me free, and as I knocked them down one by one using actually evidence you've been forced to drop every one of them until you're down to "She's perfect! She's More than perfect. Shes so good and kind and such a strong person".

    So it looks pretty much like your desire to see her free is not based on an legal or rational basis, but rather your personal feeling for her.

    If I'm wrong, feel free to point out where I went wrong.
    I feel free, no worries.

    Of course it's legal and also personal.

    Legal because she has the right to stand for parole.

    Personal because a parole hearing is about remorse, understanding, shame...

    Human feelings that I just can identify and appreciate as a human being.

    Leave a comment:


  • Magpie
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    It's a public discussion and I'm sorry it ended like that.

    For those who don't know much about the case, suffice to say that Bobby Beausoleil, decades after, still tries to exonerate Manson..
    No, what Bobby has done is admit that he killed Hinman, that he is responisble for Hinman's death, that he knew what he was doing when he did it, and that he deserves to be in prison for it.

    And that, my friend, is accepting responsibility, not blaming the big bad Manson bogeyman for your wrongdoing.


    And I notice that you didn't include your muse among the people who admitted to being there.... Could that be because your repentent, good, strong, perfect woman has steadfastly refused to talk about the Hinman murder since she first admitting being there at her trial?

    And you still haven't answered my earlier question: Was Leslie lying when she repeatedly claimed that Bobby was not enthralled by Charlie, and that in fact it was Charlie who was desperate for Bobby to stick around?

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Many thanks, Mike.
    It's almost dawn and I lack words.

    Leave a comment:


  • Magpie
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    I'm disappointed.
    That's insulting and stupid.
    Well, you started out making all sorts of rational or legalistic sounding claims to support your contention that a brutal murderer should me free, and as I knocked them down one by one using actually evidence you've been forced to drop every one of them until you're down to "She's perfect! She's More than perfect. Shes so good and kind and such a strong person".

    So it looks pretty much like your desire to see her free is not based on an legal or rational basis, but rather your personal feeling for her.

    If I'm wrong, feel free to point out where I went wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    On the one hand we ask people to show remorse and patience and understanding, and on the other, when they miraculously do so, we turn our faces away.
    Because as individuals we can be decent folk, but as groups we are total shyte; humanity in its entirety.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by Magpie View Post
    And ironically the one person who has fully accepted responsibility for his crimes instead of invoking the Charlie bogeyman at every opportunity (Bobby) doesn't get even a fraction of the consideration you demand for your sweetheart.

    Is that because he's not as hot as Leslie, or what?
    It's a public discussion and I'm sorry it ended like that.

    For those who don't know much about the case, suffice to say that Bobby Beausoleil, decades after, still tries to exonerate Manson.
    BB tortured and killed his friend Hinman, after Manson cut his ear.
    Manson and Beausoleil would have us believe that it was a drug burn gone wild. Which is proven false by Brunner, Atkins, DeCarlo and co, Davis...in short, everybody.
    Including Beausoleil first testimony.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    I'm disappointed.
    That's insulting and stupid.
    Glad to know we differ about Leslie.

    Leave a comment:


  • Magpie
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post


    I know that you know: lobby, Manson, etc.
    You keep repeating that mantra like people lobbying to keep her locked up are doing something wrong, or that her Manson associations are somehow irrelevant.


    And ironically the one person who has fully accepted responsibility for his crimes instead of invoking the Charlie bogeyman at every opportunity (Bobby) doesn't get even a fraction of the consideration you demand for your sweetheart.

    Is that because he's not as hot as Leslie, or what?

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    I'll tell you when you reach this level.
    You're not far.
    Just show a little love for Leslie and it'll be all right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Magpie
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    You have a special gift for misunderstanding, at times.

    .
    No, I think you meant to say I have a special gift for understanding all too well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Magpie
    replied
    Leslie stands up for parole. It's her right.
    Parole is not a right.



    She's perfect.

    More than perfect
    .

    Okay, so now it's finally out in the open: You have a crush on her.

    Fair enough, but why bother pretending that there is a logical, rational or legal basis for your desire for her to be released?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X