Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Age of users

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post
    Yeah, Suzi, ancient.

    I'm not far behind you - 1954 me. The sobering thought is that we are both considerably older than Jack's victims. The consolation is that he'd probably leave us well alone.

    Love,

    Caz &
    XXX

    PS What's the difference between Santa and Tiger Woods?

    Santa stops at three hos.
    Caz, Suzi,

    Very slightly behind you both, 1958 model on the outside, young at heart on the inside here.

    Started when I was 11, through the tales from my gran, b.9.8.1888 in the East End. I was fascinated from the word go. Am VERY lucky to have listened to her for about 9 years...we went around the East End a few times in Dad's car...if he drove over 25/30mph, she thought he was a mad driver! But apart from that, she didn't approve of the new high rise tennament flats nor the amount of cars.

    Nurse Sarah...50 years is a good estimate... but you will have times when you "lose" interest...and other things take over for longer or shorter periods...
    "love" has something to do with it...hahaha

    A Merry Whatsit and a Happy New Oojamaflip to all,
    from a warm cockney blooded "young" man from a cold Southern Norway.

    :-)

    Phil

    Leave a comment:


  • Nurse Sarah
    replied
    Im 29 next year...still learning so much about the case and probably will be for the next 50 years...if I live that long.

    Leave a comment:


  • wisfisher
    replied
    I'm 62
    I have been interested in JTR since 1960 but didn't get to London until 1994.
    I wandered into the Alma on the evening of a cloak & dagger meeting.
    People asked if I was staying for the meeting. I said what meeting and that's where I met many of the people on this site.


    Tom

    Leave a comment:


  • John Bennett
    replied
    I'm 41. JTR since I was 6. But Casebook/Whitechapel Society etc. since 2006. A newbie, in other words.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul
    replied
    Originally posted by Mrs. E. Nigma View Post
    Well, Paul, it all started when I was 12. My sister was watching a show about JTR, and they showed flashes of the MJK crime scene photos. It scared me pretty bad, but after that it just always seemed unreal to me that someone could have committed such crimes and NEVER be caught.

    I just recently started really researching it though. These boards have been a great help. Not that I ever say much though. Sort of intimidating being a newbie among some of the great minds on the case.

    Best Wishes and Happy Holidays to All,
    Erynn
    I know how you feel!

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Originally posted by Suzi View Post
    I'm getting and feeling ancient but 30 odd years of Rip and great friends met through it- see me well

    OK born in 1951!!!!!
    Yeah, Suzi, ancient.

    I'm not far behind you - 1954 me. The sobering thought is that we are both considerably older than Jack's victims. The consolation is that he'd probably leave us well alone.

    Love,

    Caz &
    XXX

    PS What's the difference between Santa and Tiger Woods?

    Santa stops at three hos.

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Age

    I was young, and I was watching one of the JTR fiction movies, and it scared the crap out of me .
    But as I got older I realized this man was dead by now and started to investigate, finding my interest in serial killers and murderers in general.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mrs. E. Nigma
    replied
    Well, Paul, it all started when I was 12. My sister was watching a show about JTR, and they showed flashes of the MJK crime scene photos. It scared me pretty bad, but after that it just always seemed unreal to me that someone could have committed such crimes and NEVER be caught.

    I just recently started really researching it though. These boards have been a great help. Not that I ever say much though. Sort of intimidating being a newbie among some of the great minds on the case.

    Best Wishes and Happy Holidays to All,
    Erynn

    Leave a comment:


  • Limehouse
    replied
    Oh I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now".

    Dylan

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve S
    replied
    53 here..........

    Leave a comment:


  • vol_cat
    replied
    age

    I am 38 and I feel that I have a long way to go before I understand this case. But that is what keeps me coming back I suppose. Such mystery!

    Leave a comment:


  • Suzi
    replied
    I'm getting and feeling ancient but 30 odd years of Rip and great friends met through it- see me well

    OK born in 1951!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • cappuccina
    replied
    ...not to worry, Tom; you're still a baby in my book...

    I'm 49....

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Crap, I'm old now. I was young when I first started on the Casebook back in '98, but now I'm 36.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    63 almost old enough to remember it in the papers

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X