Had a bit of trouble pondering which sub-forum to stick this in, which will become clear.
In the last couple of days I've read about a couple of things concerning ink on old documents.
First there's the Vinland Map.
"The Vinland Map is a fake,” said Raymond Clemens, curator of early books and manuscripts at Yale’s Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library, which houses the map. “There is no reasonable doubt here. This new analysis should put the matter to rest."
https://news.yale.edu/2021/09/01/ana...d-map-its-fake
There's also the Marie-Antoinette secret correspondence with Swedish count Axel von Fersen.
This methodology successfully revealed the redacted contents of eight letters, shedding new light not only on Marie-Antoinette and Fersen relationship but also on the author of the redactions.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abg4266
All this analysis of inks did make me think if anything could be determinded from the Maybrick diary using the tech used in these 2 examples.
In the last couple of days I've read about a couple of things concerning ink on old documents.
First there's the Vinland Map.
"The Vinland Map is a fake,” said Raymond Clemens, curator of early books and manuscripts at Yale’s Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library, which houses the map. “There is no reasonable doubt here. This new analysis should put the matter to rest."
https://news.yale.edu/2021/09/01/ana...d-map-its-fake
There's also the Marie-Antoinette secret correspondence with Swedish count Axel von Fersen.
This methodology successfully revealed the redacted contents of eight letters, shedding new light not only on Marie-Antoinette and Fersen relationship but also on the author of the redactions.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abg4266
All this analysis of inks did make me think if anything could be determinded from the Maybrick diary using the tech used in these 2 examples.
Comment