Thank you, Herlock. It just seemed clear to me that if just one such experiment, producing an equivalent blood pattern to one from an actual murder scene, can result in no blood ending up on the person, or even the white overalls, of the 'assailant', despite having taken no particular avoidance measures, and this outcome was totally unexpected by the 'experts' concerned with deciding guilt or innocence, then there has to be reasonable doubt that the real killer would still have been covered in the blood he was spilling.
I also find it difficult to believe that if any blood might have flown in the direction of the window then it must have been blocked by Williams body. If it must have hit him in the face (as has been suggested) what would have been the chances of none going slightly to the left or right or above his head? But no blood spatter in that direction.
Leave a comment: