Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vincent Alias Jack

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by barnflatwyngarde View Post
    Ah, you mean Blitchy.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    My problem is tha5 he had all the flaws pointed out t9 him back in 2014 (at the latest) but is still trying to peddle the dribble.

    Drop the dogs, the images only he can see and address how Vincent Can be in France and Whitechapel at the same time and I’ll give him some respect.

    Carry on with obvious BS and expect a caning.

    As an aside I admire Steady and Jon supporting his right to have his say.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    Pffft. Put away the kid gloves. If he wants to tarnish a great artist's legacy with this cockamamie drivel, he has to be prepared for the consequences.
    It is bad dragging the good name of an artist or whoever when they know full well there not Jack. Even if that isn't the case ignorance is no excuse.

    Leave a comment:


  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    I wish that we could blame the murders on the person who invented predictive bloody text!
    Ah, you mean Blitchy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by barnflatwyngarde View Post
    Oops, Fruity should read Druitt.

    Damn predictive text.

    But then again.......
    I wish that we could blame the murders on the person who invented predictive bloody text!

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    It's interesting that Vincent Van Gogh was in Arles during November 1888, in the company of Paul Gaugin. However, the two painters might have been giving each other alibis, and Gaugin was in fact George Hutchinson, on the look-out whilst Vinnie was doing the business in Room 13. He legs it back to Arles whilst Gaugin stalls for time and gives the gullible Abberline a load of malarkey about a blinged Jew [whoops, sorry, a man of foreign appearance]. His job done, Gaugin returns to the Yellow House in Arles, where Van Gogh paints Falling Autumn Leaves, an obvious reference to the string of bodies he's left behind in Whitechapel.

    Don’t give him ideas Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    Oops, Fruity should read Druitt.

    Damn predictive text.

    But then again.......

    Leave a comment:


  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    I have a vision of Vincent standing before the celestial judge.

    When the heavenly voice booms out " Who is Jack the Ripper?"

    Vincent steps forward and says "I am Jack the Ripper".

    A slight pause, and then Kosminski steps forward and says " No, I am Jack the Ripper".

    Fruity steps forward and says, "I am Jack the Ripper".

    Blotchy steps forward and says " I am Jack the Ripper".

    And on, and on, and on.........

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    It's interesting that Vincent Van Gogh was in Arles during November 1888, in the company of Paul Gaugin. However, the two painters might have been giving each other alibis, and Gaugin was in fact George Hutchinson, on the look-out whilst Vinnie was doing the business in Room 13. He legs it back to Arles whilst Gaugin stalls for time and gives the gullible Abberline a load of malarkey about a blinged Jew [whoops, sorry, a man of foreign appearance]. His job done, Gaugin returns to the Yellow House in Arles, where Van Gogh paints Falling Autumn Leaves, an obvious reference to the string of bodies he's left behind in Whitechapel.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    It reflects to your credit Jon that you show concern for someone who is coming under heavy criticism but....I have to agree with Harry. Dale has come on the forum with the attitude that he’s solved the case. He’s avoided any proper debate and come up with the old ‘you so called experts are stuck with your old ideas that you can’t accept my original thinking etc.’ I think that Dale is being less than honest. I accept though that simply ‘piling on’ serves no purpose so I won’t comment again unless Dale suddenly decides that he really does need to show how Van Gogh committed the Whitechapel Murders from Arles

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Pffft. Put away the kid gloves. If he wants to tarnish a great artist's legacy with this cockamamie drivel, he has to be prepared for the consequences.

    Leave a comment:


  • Steadmund Brand
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
    Hi Steve

    Understood.
    I had to say something as I felt a bit uncomfortable about the stick he was getting. He wasn`t replying and I do worry about the people behind the keyboard. Just one person saying steady chaps may make a difference.
    We are British after all !!
    Wow.. I was the only one standing up for him for a long time (and I'm an American!! go figure) But I agree... you are a good guy!!

    Steadmund Brand

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Hey, thanks lads.
    We`re all good guys here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    you are a good dude Jon. seriously

    Seconded!!


    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
    Hi Steve

    Understood.
    I had to say something as I felt a bit uncomfortable about the stick he was getting. He wasn`t replying and I do worry about the people behind the keyboard. Just one person saying steady chaps may make a difference.
    We are British after all !!
    you are a good dude Jon. seriously

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X