The Missing Evidence - New Ripper Documentary

[pinkmoon]

Common sense must prevail surely and people should stop claiming solved when it clearly isn't.

[Lechmere]

That wasn't what he was asking - some suspects can be ruled out as they were abroad or incapacitated for some reason at the time.

[GUT]

Jonathan
I think it is sensible not to rule any of the crimes out – he can’t be ruled out for any of them and they are all within his range. If this were a live cold case reinvestigation that would be the case.
The similarities of these cases far outweigh the differences in my opinion

And of course he can't be ruled in for any of them either.

[Cogidubnus]

Hi Chris

Surely the reason is obvious (sorry - this has surely been said before):

Cross: Witness did not notice that her throat was cut, the night being very dark.

Neil: I examined the body by the aid of my lamp, and noticed blood oozing from a wound in the throat.

Yes, I had to explain this, at length, to my missus...who wanted to know why I'd almost exploded in wrath...but nonetheless it was a well-made doco, and I expect, sadly, it'll stick in the minds of the non-ripperological community for a little while at least...hopefully not as long as the royal nonsense though...

all the best

Dave

[Lechmere]

Robert (not Tro… I mean Rob)
I’m sure you need no reminding of the Paul-Chapman theory (as I shall refer to it). You can find it somewhere on this forum I am sure.

tji
The arrogance shown over the shawl was the immediate expectation that the author or his main scientific helper were answerable to people on casebook and should respond to e-mails or the posted comments on this forum, and the fact that they did not meant that they were in the wrong.