Originally posted by Bailey
View Post
That said, it is thus necessary to have a pretty good working knowledge of the case and the official reports. I usually feel fairly secure with my general knowledge of these reports as I transcribed them all many years ago. On this occasion I must disagree with the above poster and say that the official reports should always take precedence over secondary sources; on this occasion I do not think that I am in error. I do not agree that 'there was only intestines over her shoulder.'
To back up this statement I would refer you to Chief Inspector Swanson's overall report, of 19 October 1888, on the Chapman murder, HO 144/221/A49301C, f 137. Here he clearly states - "Removed from but attached to body, & placed above right shoulder were a flap of the wall of belly, the whole of the small intestines & attachments Two other portions of wall of belly & "Pubes" were placed above left shoulder in a large quantity of blood."


Leave a comment: