Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
I am not communicating with that person, I saw no need for anything other than that comment, to ignore completely would have been wrong..
Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
You present that case very well without any help from anyone else.
Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
It is fully accepted that he has knowledge, that does not however mean he is not bias in his views. You believe he is not, to be expected given that you have the same suspect, others have a different view. Obviously we will disagree on that.
Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
We disagree on that very point, I see it built on half-truths, great exaggeration and very selective use of sources, as do many others. You and Ed obviously do not.
I will say that the book does not dismiss Lechmere as a suspect, and neither did the podcast, it merely attempts to look at the sources as objectively as possible.
Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
Given that I responded to your initial criticisms, you have decided not to respond to those comments in any meaningful way.
I have in the last few days, answered again the points you have raised, and you have at the time of writing not replied to those.
Can I thank you for the free publicity your continuing posts ensure.
Steve
Leave a comment: