Bowyer´s inquest testimony

[David Orsam]

I prefer trying new thoughts.

There's nothing wrong with that, but saying, without qualification, "MJK3 is showing the table and bed barricading the door" is not a "new thought" it is a false statement.

[Pierre]

Why not most people with a pet theory twist the facts to suit the theory rather than twisting the theory to suit the facts, Pierre may as well too, at least it makes it easy to spot the theories that are dead wrong.

I prefer trying new thoughts. The old ones haven´t led to solving this case.

Regards Pierre

[GUT]

Sorry Pierre, but it is not showing that. Please stop misrepresenting the evidence.

Why not most people with a pet theory twist the facts to suit the theory rather than twisting the theory to suit the facts, Pierre may as well too, at least it makes it easy to spot the theories that are dead wrong.

[David Orsam]

Since MJK3 is showing the table and bed barricading the door

Sorry Pierre, but it is not showing that. Please stop misrepresenting the evidence.

[Pierre]

It takes time for your eyes to adjust to a dark room, when its light outside.
At his first glance he saw what was directly in front of him, he had to take a second look to appreciate the context of what he saw on the table.

There's no mystery here Pierre.

But how could he see that it was flesh lying on the table, then?

Since MJK3 is showing the table and bed barricading the door the testimony of Bowyer becomes easier to understand.

But I don´t think peole want to see that. They want to see what the believe instead of believing what they see.

Regards Pierre

[Wickerman]

It takes time for your eyes to adjust to a dark room, when its light outside.
At his first glance he saw what was directly in front of him, he had to take a second look to appreciate the context of what he saw on the table.

There's no mystery here Pierre.

[GUT]

Or as simple as that when he saw the lumps of bloody flesh he pulled back, before he even looked at anything else in the room.

But then the simplest answer is usually the closest to the facts.

[Pierre]

Hi,

At the inquest, Bowyer testified:

" There was a curtain. I put my hand through the broken pane and lifted the curtain.

I saw two pieces of flesh lying on the table.

[Coroner] Where was this table ? - In front of the bed, close to it.

The second time I looked I saw a body on this bed, and blood on the floor.

Why did Bowyer not see the body on the bed the first time he looked in through the window?

Can this be the reason why he did not see the body the first time? The table was "in front of the bed" if you were trying to enter the room: