"Watchman, old man, I believe somebody is murdered down the street."

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Barnaby
    replied
    Complete aside: My 4-year-old stands guard over every drainage ditch/pipe/gutter he finds: The Ninja turtles are down there.

    Related: My gut feeling is that a serial killer who poses the victims would be much more likely to interject himself into the case. Is this backed up with data (too lazy to look - busy watching out for Shredder coming out of the sewer).

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger
    replied
    Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
    I'm left wondering why the Whitechapel District Board of Works would employ a night watchman to stand guard over a sewage works.
    I've always taken it to mean that some work was being done on the sewers, and probably supplies, workmen's tools, etc., were left there overnight, and needed to be watched.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    Steady on Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • RockySullivan
    replied
    Originally posted by Defective Detective View Post
    Yes! That's it. Thank you.

    A few scatterbrained thoughts that popped into my head as I read this:

    1. 'John Clearly' was told by this mystery soldier about the body three days before it was discovered. I mean, I guess it could be coincidental, and a lot of the 'rationalists' who approach the case may say something like "well, it was completely unconnected to the torso", but that doesn't feel right to my gut. I have a very strong impression that the soldier was the murderer - does anyone want to make the opposite case?

    2. There's no report of the soldier that 'Clearly' reported to see, though we know from the Martha Tabram ID line-ups that the military was not necessarily the most helpful institution in the case. Do we think think this man was really a soldier? If not, are there any suspects who may have had an ex-military background? For that matter, does anyone know how difficult a matter it would have been for someone to acquire a uniform for the purpose of disguise?

    3. Speaking of Tabram, do we think that this event makes it more plausible that at least Tabram's murderer and the Torso killer are one and the same? I wonder just how many murderous 'soldiers' could have been loose in the City at the same time.

    4. Does anyone else agree with me that, if Jack were the Torso killer, the Mulshaw event wasn't a couple of butchers (which I admit is probably a marginally more probable scenario otherwise) and he very much threw himself headlong into this case? If Jack/Mr. Torso were calling attention to his deeds at the very scenes of the crimes, then I also think it very plausible that he was a letter writer. The psychology, to me, suggests a desire to be known for what he is.

    I don't want to put too fine a point on this one concept: I think it entire possible that Mulshaw, Mrs. Paumier and Clearly could all have been lying, or one or some of them; or that, as with Mulshaw, what looks like nefarious game-playing by a killer has a perfectly logical explanation. But I also think that the three taken together must at least suggest the possibility that one killer's idea of fun involved alarming bystanders about his crimes. And if that were the case, it suggests a psychology quite remote from the now-contemporary idea of the Ripper as basically a Kosminskian lunatic.
    The strange thing for me is in the liz Jackson torso case she was left in her drawers with initials that where eventually traced as shorts she's bought second hand from LE Fisher. If the dismemberment and spreading of her body parts was done to hinder id...why leave the shorts with initials? An oversight it's possible yes. Or the dismemberment wasn't necessarily to hinder id but for the shock value of different people finding body parts. After all the whitehall torso was left under the police station...that is a sign of taunting and staging to create terror. And the ripper crimes...there purpose may have been the staging ....with the victims bodies opened up and their legs spread. And Mary Kelly was quote a scene. It's possible that torso/jack got his kicks from the terror his mutilates victims created. I know errata will disagree and she's Has a better perspective than me on this case obviously, but I think torso and jack show signs of the same sick mind

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    though we know from the Martha Tabram ID line-ups that the military was not necessarily the most helpful institution in the case.
    They paraded two separate Guards Units on different occasions and at different locations to accommodate the police. In what way were they unhelpful?

    Leave a comment:


  • Defective Detective
    replied
    Originally posted by The Good Michael View Post
    Def Detective,

    Go here and read the 2nd paragraph. You'll have what you were looking for, but it isn't related to what you were talking about in regards to a comparison.



    Mike
    Yes! That's it. Thank you.

    A few scatterbrained thoughts that popped into my head as I read this:

    1. 'John Clearly' was told by this mystery soldier about the body three days before it was discovered. I mean, I guess it could be coincidental, and a lot of the 'rationalists' who approach the case may say something like "well, it was completely unconnected to the torso", but that doesn't feel right to my gut. I have a very strong impression that the soldier was the murderer - does anyone want to make the opposite case?

    2. There's no report of the soldier that 'Clearly' reported to see, though we know from the Martha Tabram ID line-ups that the military was not necessarily the most helpful institution in the case. Do we think think this man was really a soldier? If not, are there any suspects who may have had an ex-military background? For that matter, does anyone know how difficult a matter it would have been for someone to acquire a uniform for the purpose of disguise?

    3. Speaking of Tabram, do we think that this event makes it more plausible that at least Tabram's murderer and the Torso killer are one and the same? I wonder just how many murderous 'soldiers' could have been loose in the City at the same time.

    4. Does anyone else agree with me that, if Jack were the Torso killer, the Mulshaw event wasn't a couple of butchers (which I admit is probably a marginally more probable scenario otherwise) and he very much threw himself headlong into this case? If Jack/Mr. Torso were calling attention to his deeds at the very scenes of the crimes, then I also think it very plausible that he was a letter writer. The psychology, to me, suggests a desire to be known for what he is.

    I don't want to put too fine a point on this one concept: I think it entire possible that Mulshaw, Mrs. Paumier and Clearly could all have been lying, or one or some of them; or that, as with Mulshaw, what looks like nefarious game-playing by a killer has a perfectly logical explanation. But I also think that the three taken together must at least suggest the possibility that one killer's idea of fun involved alarming bystanders about his crimes. And if that were the case, it suggests a psychology quite remote from the now-contemporary idea of the Ripper as basically a Kosminskian lunatic.
    Last edited by Defective Detective; 11-09-2014, 09:59 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    I agree with Ed,

    For me it was Brittain.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    In my opinion the most likely identity of the informant was one of the three horse butchers who had been told by Thane about the murder and were going round the corner to gawp and in doing so would have passed Mulshaw.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Def Detective,

    Go here and read the 2nd paragraph. You'll have what you were looking for, but it isn't related to what you were talking about in regards to a comparison.



    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • RockySullivan
    replied
    Was there ever a description of the man that spoke to mulshaw? Could really be something. From another perspective what if there was no man and he was lying. You have someone alone near the crime scene and while I doubt he's the killer you have a similar situation to Lechmere right? Is love to learn more about the man who reported the pinchin torso before it was found, I think it's strange he went to the paper to ask for money and then a body shows up. It's a keen observation how similar these two scenarios are detective

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Defective Detective View Post
    ... It would incline me very much towards a certain view of the 'Ripper' as a cat-and-mouser which was popular decades ago but which has fallen out of favor. Combined with the detail from the Kelly murder that Wickerman relates, that would suggest a killer much more in keeping with the old 'Dear Boss'/cockney punter/Jack The Knife view of him as a Grand Guignol player of games.
    Someone who enjoys partaking in the attention he has created. Someone who revels in toying with other witnesses, posing as "one who knows". Someone who hovers around the crime scene as part of the thrill of the chase.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Wasn't it published in an american paper? Or maybe I am thinking of another.

    Pat..........

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    It was in regards to the Pinchin Street case.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • RockySullivan
    replied
    Originally posted by Defective Detective View Post
    Can anybody recall the torso case I'm referring to? I wish I had that information at hand, but I haven't taken any notes on the torso cases and the event I'm referring to seems absent both from the Casebook dissertation on the case and the other pages I've pulled up about the torso slayings.

    As I recall, and I very well may be wrong about it, a chap ran into someone he thought was a copper in the street, who asked him something along the lines of "have you heard about the latest body we've found?". This guy went to a newspaper, and they in turn took the story to the police, who inspected the location he reported to have seen this 'policeman' and found a body - and that no policeman recalled the incident.

    I wish to Hell I could remember the exact details of this incident, but it was one of those things I treated as anecdotal when I read it. But if we entertain for the moment that the Ripper was also the Torso Murderer - perhaps 'ripping' when he had not the time or opportunity to take a victim along in whatever mode of transportation the Torso Murderer presumably used - and if we assume that this killer told both Mulshaw and whatever poor man it was I'm remembering from the torso cases about his murders before they were discovered, then that would be a pretty remarkably modus operandi. It would incline me very much towards a certain view of the 'Ripper' as a cat-and-mouser which was popular decades ago but which has fallen out of favor. Combined with the detail from the Kelly murder that Wickerman relates, that would suggest a killer much more in keeping with the old 'Dear Boss'/cockney punter/Jack The Knife view of him as a Grand Guignol player of games.
    I remember the story your talking about the man who went to the station to collect a reward for reporting murder. Wasn't he a journalist? I tjink I read the story in rumbelows book if that's possible

    Leave a comment:


  • Defective Detective
    replied
    Can anybody recall the torso case I'm referring to? I wish I had that information at hand, but I haven't taken any notes on the torso cases and the event I'm referring to seems absent both from the Casebook dissertation on the case and the other pages I've pulled up about the torso slayings.

    As I recall, and I very well may be wrong about it, a chap ran into someone he thought was a copper in the street, who asked him something along the lines of "have you heard about the latest body we've found?". This guy went to a newspaper, and they in turn took the story to the police, who inspected the location he reported to have seen this 'policeman' and found a body - and that no policeman recalled the incident.

    I wish to Hell I could remember the exact details of this incident, but it was one of those things I treated as anecdotal when I read it. But if we entertain for the moment that the Ripper was also the Torso Murderer - perhaps 'ripping' when he had not the time or opportunity to take a victim along in whatever mode of transportation the Torso Murderer presumably used - and if we assume that this killer told both Mulshaw and whatever poor man it was I'm remembering from the torso cases about his murders before they were discovered, then that would be a pretty remarkably modus operandi. It would incline me very much towards a certain view of the 'Ripper' as a cat-and-mouser which was popular decades ago but which has fallen out of favor. Combined with the detail from the Kelly murder that Wickerman relates, that would suggest a killer much more in keeping with the old 'Dear Boss'/cockney punter/Jack The Knife view of him as a Grand Guignol player of games.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X