Originally posted by Abby Normal
View Post
Worth accentuating that Issac Kozebrodksi, seemingly a valued apprentice at the club, around 17 years old, stated within 1 hour of the murder that he was sent by Louis alone to seek help. It appears that Louis left with someone named Issacs after that, and Eagle went on his quest.
Why accentuate that statement? Because A) it directly contradicts what most people believe was a reference by Louis that Issac Kozebrodksi attended him, it add another search party to the list, which historically is at 2
parties, not 3...., and B) It places Isaac kozebroski, with Louis, by the body, at "about 10 minutes after half past", when he returned to the club.
Which matches the times given by Hoshberg, Gileman, and Spooner....an outside witness and invaluable when looking for objective testimony.
Ive asked Stewart Evans directly here, someone who I personally feel has the absolute best grasp of the facts in these cases bar none, how there could be such timing disparity...and his answer was he had no explanation for why these timings would be as skewed as they are.
When considering that an investigation into the mysterious death of Liz Stride would initially be focussed on the people at that crime scene at the time, a club considered to be run by anarchists by the local police, statements that don't have corroboration but somehow alleviate any suspicion on the club or its members might be more understandable...in that it served a purpose, not recorded a factual event.
Anyone that suspects the club senior members would not tailor their remarks to portray the club or its members as obviously blameless in this affair is naïve. The relationships between the club, the club and the police and the club and the neighborhood that pre-existed the murder dictated as much.
That's why Eagle and Louis agree...at a find after 1am.....and lower station members like Isaac, Hoshberg and Gileman agree with each other..and therefore disagree with the former.
Cheers
Leave a comment: