If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hello Ian. That is correct. And the police claim they weren't sweepings. And the other suspect bolted--not a good sign.
Why on earth pepper?
And yes, there are a good many John Kellys in London, but I presume only a proper subset are 42 and work around the docks.
Cheers.
LC
Hi Lynn,
Yeah there werent many 42 yr old John Kellys down the docks,but it could have been a false name,i dont suppose names for things like theft were always checked in 1888,what with the transient nature if the East End locals etc.
After all its quite likely it seems that Mary Kelly was a false name(and Eddowes had Kelly as a false name)
Firstly, I must echo Tom's word that there would have been an awful lot of John Kelly's in London.
Secondly, the sweepings from a ship's hold were often considered to be "bunce" - a cash extra fo anyone who could sell them. Many years ago when I worked on cargo ships carrying grain, the sweepings were sold to local pig farmers and provided welcome beer money for the ship's crew.
Rgds
John
9 3/4 lbs is an awful lot of "sweepings" especially of something like pepper.Yes there would have been a lot of John Kellys in London.
Hello Tom and John. I heartily concur that John Kelly was a common name. And, no, there is no known link to our John Kelly. Of course, the age matches. And John was supposed to work the docks as a labourer.
Cheers.
LC
Hi Lynn
It's one thing to suggest that John Kelly pepper thief, and John Kelly the partner of Kate Eddowes were one and the same
However to suggest that should our pepper thief be Kate Eddowes beau, and that he used the pepper to hijack an anarchists meeting, thus implying a link between Kate's murder and those nasty anarchists, well what can I say. Have you ever considered a career in dime novels, the writing of that is?
Hello Tom and John. I heartily concur that John Kelly was a common name. And, no, there is no known link to our John Kelly. Of course, the age matches. And John was supposed to work the docks as a labourer.
Firstly, I must echo Tom's word that there would have been an awful lot of John Kelly's in London.
Secondly, the sweepings from a ship's hold were often considered to be "bunce" - a cash extra fo anyone who could sell them. Many years ago when I worked on cargo ships carrying grain, the sweepings were sold to local pig farmers and provided welcome beer money for the ship's crew.
Hi Lynn
I mentioned on the 'how drunk was eddowes thread' that after taking your pointer i read the times inquest report.
I agree with you there's something not right about what he was saying.
Who was the 'mystery woman' who came to tell Kelly about catharine being locked up?
Why didn't he go to Bishopsgate to enquire about her wellbeing,if not that night then certainly the morning after?
He didn't come forward until he read about the pawn ticket in the papers!!!
Even though an unidentified woman had been murdered in the area and the love of his life had not been seen for how long?
Keep it up Lynn,very interesting
Hello All. Here is an interesting snippet from Lloyd's August 26, 1888. The name, age and location seem consistent with our John Kelly. Also, it is involved with the docks.
Leave a comment: