Lechmere Continuation Thread

[Columbo]

Colombo,
The one series of crimes are committed in isolation,at a place that is secure and allows time.
The other series are committed in public places.
Why the difference?

That's bothered me too. Why risk relative safety for a thrill kill? How many times was JTR almost caught as opposed to the Torso murderer being safely behind closed doors?

I want to know more about the surgical connection that has been mentioned.

Columbo

[Columbo]

Y
Are you having a problem with your ears, Dusty? I have told you over and over again that the area you point to was disallowed for us to work in.

That's a great line for a written forum.

Columbo

[Columbo]

Hello Columbo,

>>So let's discuss. I miss alot of things so please forgive any repeated questions. <<

To save confusion and the need to repeat questions, there is a threads set up to discuss this.

http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=9649&page=21&highlight=torso

It has the huge plus that Debra A. has posted there, whereas she is probably giving this thread a wide berth.

Hello Dusty,

Thanks for the link. I did look that one over and it's pretty interesting. I'm trying to find a fresh angle on this and will probably start a new thread so we don't have all this clutter. There's so much info on this site it's very easy to repeat over and over. I still like your idea of a thread comparing newspapers and the reliability of them, especially for Nichols.

Columbo

[Fisherman]

Hi, all

Gentlemen and Ladies, this thread has produced some interesting discussions and not a few passionate exchanges. The conversation has been enjoyable and rewarding.
We have considered evidence and waded through much conjecture during our examination of a certain man from Bethnal Green. This is the matter we are all here to debate, his viability, as a suspect.
I am surely not alone in finding myself recently wearied while reading through pages of conflict, regarding the production values of a particular televisual documentary.

Perhaps, if that specific matter be so contentious as to require the volume of discourse it has so far generated, an ideal approach might be to create a separate thread dedicated to that matter.

Yours, Caligo

Thanks for that, Caligo. In fact, there is already a thread about the documentary:

http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=8463

[Caligo Umbrator]

Hi, all

Gentlemen and Ladies, this thread has produced some interesting discussions and not a few passionate exchanges. The conversation has been enjoyable and rewarding.
We have considered evidence and waded through much conjecture during our examination of a certain man from Bethnal Green. This is the matter we are all here to debate, his viability, as a suspect.
I am surely not alone in finding myself recently wearied while reading through pages of conflict, regarding the production values of a particular televisual documentary.

Perhaps, if that specific matter be so contentious as to require the volume of discourse it has so far generated, an ideal approach might be to create a separate thread dedicated to that matter.

Yours, Caligo

[Fisherman]

That's not what my inbox is telling me.

I can understand that. But we are able to put an end to the rot, if we collectively decide to make amense. And as I said, I have no problems with that. I can leave the pissing here and now, and noone would be happier than me.

You?

[drstrange169]

That's not what my inbox is telling me.

[Fisherman]

>>If the slander and manure throwing is based on an inability to write and understand the written word, then so much the worse.<<

F.Y.I. slander is about the spoken word, libel is the written word.

And libel is defined by whether the allegation is true or not. In this case it is demonstrably true.

Your only defensive could have been that you were mistaken, which is ok if you were, but as you’ve shown here you have no remorse for your actions, in fact you continue to promote them.

Slander can be based on an inability to write and/or understand the written word, so donīt try and correct something that is perfectly correct from the outset.

Language seems a stumbling block to you, so you may want to stay away from trying to correct me on such issues.

I have told you that if you had been speaking of a misrepresentation, you would have had a better case (although not a very good one), but that speaking about a lie is as unsavoury as it is wrongful.

Thatīs all there is to it and all there will ever be.

You may have noticed that people are beginning to ask for more ripperology and less pissing out here. I am trying to cater to that wish, and I advice you to do the same.

[Fisherman]

>>The "free space" behind Andy Griffiths in the picture is the road into the construction site. If it was a "free site", why do you think there is a fence between the pavement and the open street? It was fenced off to prohibit any traffic but the construction traffic.<<

The aerial shot makes in very clear the area I circled was NOT cordoned off, as do the other two shots.



End of.

Yes, there is an opening into the area you circled. If there was not, the vehicles travelling in and out of the construction site would not be able to come through.

Are you having a problem with your ears, Dusty? I have told you over and over again that the area you point to was disallowed for us to work in.

I have told you over and over again that even if we WERE allowed to work in it, we would still have a fence to scale as we approached the southern pavement. So even if we WERE allowed to use the zone where the construction vehicles passed in and out, a reconstruction of the murder night meeting would involve Lechmere and Paul jumping the fence.

You are therefore exactly as wrong as you normally are when you try to understand anything relating to the Ripper case. And to boot, you have the audacity to imply that I am lying about this!!

I have already told you to contact Edward, who you think would never lie to you, and ask him to confirm or deny what I am saying. Please take that advice, and stop behaving like a total moron on this issue.

[harry]

Colombo,
The one series of crimes are committed in isolation,at a place that is secure and allows time.
The other series are committed in public places.
Why the difference?

[drstrange169]

>>If the slander and manure throwing is based on an inability to write and understand the written word, then so much the worse.<<

F.Y.I. slander is about the spoken word, libel is the written word.

And libel is defined by whether the allegation is true or not. In this case it is demonstrably true.

Your only defensive could have been that you were mistaken, which is ok if you were, but as you’ve shown here you have no remorse for your actions, in fact you continue to promote them.

[drstrange169]

>>It will only further point you out as a particularly nasty aggressor, hellbent on inflicting as much damage as you can, regardless of the underlying facts.<<

A quick scroll back through this thread will show that the first person to post “aggressively” and hurl insults is you.

Would you like me to quote all the times you have instigated posts insult posters and being abusively aggressive?

All the times you have called people liars?

Seems you are the classic internet bully, attacking others at will and without restraint, but squeal like a stick pig when someone stands up to you.

Did you ask your editor/publisher about the quotes?

What did they say; would they be proud of your explanation?

[drstrange169]

>>The "free space" behind Andy Griffiths in the picture is the road into the construction site. If it was a "free site", why do you think there is a fence between the pavement and the open street? It was fenced off to prohibit any traffic but the construction traffic.<<

The aerial shot makes in very clear the area I circled was NOT cordoned off, as do the other two shots.



End of.

[drstrange169]

Hello Columbo,

>>So let's discuss. I miss alot of things so please forgive any repeated questions. <<

To save confusion and the need to repeat questions, there is a threads set up to discuss this.

http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=9649&page=21&highlight=torso

It has the huge plus that Debra A. has posted there, whereas she is probably giving this thread a wide berth.

[Columbo]

How about the post I made on the knife skills involved in both the Ripper and the Torso series?

So let's discuss. I miss alot of things so please forgive any repeated questions. What in the skills do you see as similar? From reading the torso posts the mutilations were more clean, precise and more expertly done then Jack's victims, which were all over the place as far as skill goes.

Columbo