Originally posted by jerryd
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		When PC Pennett started his beat he met a man (Hurley) in Pinchin Street (by coincidence) who asked to be knocked up at 5 o'clock the next morning.
Sometime before 5am, the PC walked along the north side of Pinchin St, looking at the arch as he passed. There was no body present at that time.
He then walked the 5 minute walk to Ellen Place to knock up Hurley just before 5am. Which is how he knew he was definitely in Pinchin St before 5. Next time he passed, the torso was in the archway.
Is that right?
By the way, in the Scotsman report, where five past four is mentioned;
"Q - Can you fix the time when you passed this place before?
A - Before five.
Q - Any nearer than that?
A - That might be five minutes past four, you know - I know it was all that, because coming along the night before a working man asked me to call him when I passed through Pinchin Street.
Q - You mean just before five?
A - Yes, sir. "
Do you think it could have been mistranscribed, and should have read;
"Q - Can you fix the time when you passed this place before?
A - Before five.
Q - Any nearer than that? That might be five minutes past four, you know...
A - I know it was all that, because coming along the night before a working man asked me to call him when I passed through Pinchin Street."

	
   I am weighing your post because it's a chin-scratcher.  I hope it leads somewhere.  I asked Pierre if there was a way to determine from the post mortem if the body was dismembered on the same day as the woman was murdered.  Would you have an opinion on this?
	
Leave a comment: