The Home Office annotations - do they rule out a bayonet?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Why would she have lied?
    Simon
    Again, my dear, just like Wilson : not to tell the doctor it was a client.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi David,

    Sorry, I don't get it.

    Why would she have lied?

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Yes Simon, she lied. Just like Wilson (robbery).

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi David,

    You appeared to suggest that Emma Smith may have lied about her three attackers.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Not sure what you're asking me, Simon. Re precanonical cases, my view does not reflect the opinion of the majority. Let's say I believe the C1 should be called C4, C5 or C6.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi David.

    So what are you suggesting?

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hi Simon,
    I'm not sure the 'Scotland Yard experts' did put too much faith in Emma Smith's account of her attack (see West testimony at the inquest).

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi All,

    Bayonet, dagger, knife, toasting fork? It's all a bit academic really.

    Martha Tabram murder, Echo, 10th August 1888—

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ECHO 10 AUG 1888.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	38.5 KB
ID:	663451

    How on earth did "some of the Scotland Yard experts" conclude that a gang of men had become a lone killer?

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    edit : btw, there are plenty of barracudas over here for some years. Some say it's an effect of global warming. Whatever, they eat all our fish, it's quite a disaster, and fishermen in my village don't know how to catch them. It's not in our culture.
    Barracuda are not so difficult to catch. They can get pretty big though. I like to take about a 75 pound test line and attach a bent dagger to it with some squid as bait. Make sure to use the single-edged dagger, however, or the squid just gets split in half.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Puns made on porpoise.

    Hello Christer. Please, no more puns just for the halibut. It gives me a splitting haddock.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    David:

    "Please don't get banned again, the forums haven't the same taste when you're not around."

    I´ll try to stay away from it, if you will do the same for me.

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Good one(s), Fish. Please don't get banned again, the forums haven't the same taste when you're not around.

    edit : btw, there are plenty of barracudas over here for some years. Some say it's an effect of global warming. Whatever, they eat all our fish, it's quite a disaster, and fishermen in my village don't know how to catch them. It's not in our culture.
    Last edited by DVV; 03-01-2012, 12:15 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Barracudas, David, have teeth that are sharp on both sides, so yes, that would be a likely specimen for him to catch. There´s probably only one type of fish he would NOT go for - since he would not be codding ...

    Ichtyologically yours,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hi Fish, awesome post !
    Killeen could land a barracuda in lake Genova, methinks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Sally!

    If I got so angry with you for misunderstanding this business, that I burnt you with a cigarette and a cigar - would you then say that it pointed to uncertainty if somebody said afterwards that "she received a number of burn marks, that were made by either a cigarette or a cigar"?

    Would such a thing tell us that

    A/ that somebody did not KNOW if it was a cigarette OR a cigar, or
    B/ That the marks as such all were made by a cigarette or a cigar?

    If I go fishing in a lake that holds trout and perch, and after the trip tell you that it was good fishing, since anytime I went out I could be certain to catch a trout or a perch, would that tell you that

    A/I could not tell the difference between a trout or a perch, or
    B/ That I caught EITHER a trout or a perch on each trip?

    How´s your sense for language, Sally? Can you see the flaw in your argument? Let´s test it! Here goes:

    I think you made a good or a bad argument!

    What do you think I mean? How uncertain am I about which type of argument you made?

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X