Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Mackenzie a copycat?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    I moving my next post to the thread I started earlier

    Out of respect for this thread. Apologies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    There it is...

    There's the rub. Not sure. There isn't much of anything to support any motivation. I think that may be one reason "JTR" is compelling. He was out to kill. IF IS 's account is truthfull, at least in the respect that he was there and actually saw Stride being attacked, then we got a can of worms to deal with that leaves us with Kidney or some other disgruntled associate and that just sits wrong for some reason. I don't buy Kidney for many seconds based off of the data.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    why?

    Hello (again) DLDW. Thanks.

    "Kick scream punch leave etc. If I were to speculate, I would say it likely continue assault."

    I can live with that.

    Why do you think he assaulted her in the first place?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    blush

    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    Hope you're not blushing.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    like

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    "Intrusion. Still, something was going to happen next that didn't occur because of IS or PKM or both."

    Very well. Like . . . ?

    Cheers.
    LC
    Kick scream punch leave etc. If I were to speculate, I would say it likely continue assault. That doesn't necc mean murder.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    sorry to interject I'm not choosing sides but,

    that's well and good. I'm game. But if you wish to keep at this nonsense, then you will have to go it alone like Aaron Kosminski.

    Your choice.

    Cheers.
    LC[/QUOTE]

    Comedy is comedy and that is some funny s***. Apologies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Lucky
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Lucky. Thanks.

    I will respond, but this is the LAST time. Differences mean NOTHING in themselves. Some are significant; some, insignificant.
    Hi Lynn,

    Try and understand this Lynn

    From Sally - "People - even serial killer people - are not machines working in wholly predictable circumstances. Variation is to be expected." (A position I heartily agree with)

    Your response - "Indeed. But it seems so absent from Polly to Annie."

    Totally and utterly wrong. So I have listed some of the differences for you. I'm not interested whether you think they are significant or not, as that is just a reflection of your bias, those differences are real and cannot simple be explained away because it doesn't fit with your 'JI' killed Nichols and Chapman theory.
    Last edited by Mr Lucky; 06-10-2013, 10:37 PM. Reason: sp

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    significant

    Hello Lucky. Thanks.

    I will respond, but this is the LAST time. Differences mean NOTHING in themselves. Some are significant; some, insignificant.

    I could have listed many more differences between Annie and Kate. I did not because it would insult one's intelligence.

    So:

    1. I did not mention that Polly and Annie were killed in Whitechapel/Spitalfields; Kate in Aldgate. NOT significant.

    2. I did not mention time of day: Polly and Annie in the wee hours; Kate earlier. NOT significant.

    Now, if you wish to get serious and discuss:

    1. organ extraction

    2. possible striking of Polly with the fist

    that's well and good. I'm game. But if you wish to keep at this nonsense, then you will have to go it alone like Aaron Kosminski.

    Your choice.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    next

    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    "Intrusion. Still, something was going to happen next that didn't occur because of IS or PKM or both."

    Very well. Like . . . ?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Lucky
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    They will stand in your mind anyway.
    The differences between the killings of Nichols and Chapman still stand.

    IF there is one serious and significant difference, it is the uterus removal. But I have already explained that.
    It doesn't matter what you 'explain', the differences between the killing still remain.

    Now, I think I recognise the stained finger of a colleague in all this. So tell me, who put you up to this nonsense? (You don't have to say if you find it embarrassing.)
    Lynn, you're a detective genius, it's clearly the emerald-green stained fingers of a St Petersburg based fenian/tsarist splinter group from the free-masons that's put me up to this.

    They've promised me one of those golden mechanical Easter eggs from the Imperial collection, if I can throw you of their scent by quoting contemporary material actually connected to the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Better term

    Intrusion. Still, something was going to happen next that didn't occur because of IS or PKM or both. Hope that helps. Time was not going to freeze.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Hullo Lynn

    Kick punch scream leave etc. The point is he turned his attention towards IS apparently. Had IS paused and remained unnoticed the events that transpired would have not been influenced. Call it natural proggression. And don't forget Pipe/Knife man. Crudely relayed. Hope you get my meaning.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    qualification

    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    "I would still say IS coming along interrupted BSM's assault on Stride."

    So, what more did he plan to do?

    "Of course that is if it actually happened."

    Lovely qualification.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Ah

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello DLSDW. Thanks.

    To be "interrupted" is to be interrupted at something--if at nothing but the next step.

    The idea about "Liz's assailant being interrupted" is that he was planning mutilations, but didn't because he was interrupted. Hence, planning.

    So also with Polly. The idea is that her uterus was to be taken, but her killer was interrupted.

    Cheers.
    LC
    I would still say IS coming along interupted BSM's assault on Stride. Of course that is if it actually happened.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    planning

    Hello DLSDW. Thanks.

    To be "interrupted" is to be interrupted at something--if at nothing but the next step.

    The idea about "Liz's assailant being interrupted" is that he was planning mutilations, but didn't because he was interrupted. Hence, planning.

    So also with Polly. The idea is that her uterus was to be taken, but her killer was interrupted.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:

Working...