Anyone seen this before??

[RivkahChaya]

After seriously studying it, I see several Batman villians: Heath Ledger as the Joker, Danny DeVito as the Penguin, Julie Newmar as Catwoman, and whoever it was who played the guy with the big head in the 60s TV show. Also, I see Pluto from the Disney cartoons. NOT Goofy, Pluto. I think I see Squidward from SpongeBob, too. Possibly, too, the monster from I Married a Monster from Outer Space, but I haven't seen it in a while, so I'd have to check. It could be Chewbacca in a pro-mask.

[Pcdunn]

I do see the full face of the woman (smiling a little), as well as a three-quarter view of the man (looks a bit like Charles Dickens), which is more of a caricature -- but, as I know from time spent on paranormal forums, there is such a thing as "matrixing" in which the brain tries to make bits of an unrecognizable pattern into a picture that makes sense.
Therefore I am wary of trusting my perception, and do not accept these "images" as sketches.

[DJA]

P.S. I love Horshack who doesn't?

Could you make the picture a little smaller?

http://www.hammillpost.com/wp-conten...rshack-hat.jpg

[packers stem]

Sorry but NO I do not accept its a sketch, if so it was done by a 3 year old.

I've also not seen anything by an Art Expert that says its a sketch. And even if he did, what was he shown?

The negativity is because I can see no way that it's physical evidence of anything, by that token lets discuss what sort of wood the partition was made if, that too is physical evidence, and that too adds not a jot to the case.

Or do what you are trying to do and make something not there appear.

I'm seeing a rather skilled sketch, my eye sight is thankfully still excellent.
When i was younger i was always interested in tv signals.Picking up transmissions from long distances and spent many happy hours watching very grainy tv signals while happily messing with aerials.Maybe my eyes are more tuned to picking out images through grainy pictures.
If you're on a laptop i suggest turning it side on until you see it or look on a small screen
I am certainly not trying to make something appear that is not there...it is there
I'm not aware that anyone up till now has ever picked up on this so no art expert would have studied it but someone could have it enhanced from the original and then take it from there...

[GUT]

Of course not!! and i'm pleased you've accepted it's a sketch
The point is,if an art expert says it is a sketch isn't it something important due to the possibility that it could have been the work of the killer.
I mentioned earlier in the thread that it could have been Kelly who sketched it but it remains a possible something that's not been picked up on.Do killers not occasionally leave a clue behind?
We've always wanted physical evidence to discuss,this could end up being so,so why the constant negativity towards it?
I know what i see there and it's changed my thoughts completely.If anyone wishes to ignore it,of course they can do so but that wont make something that has appeared disappear...

Sorry but NO I do not accept its a sketch, if so it was done by a 3 year old.

I've also not seen anything by an Art Expert that says its a sketch. And even if he did, what was he shown?

The negativity is because I can see no way that it's physical evidence of anything, by that token lets discuss what sort of wood the partition was made if, that too is physical evidence, and that too adds not a jot to the case.

Or do what you are trying to do and make something not there appear.

[packers stem]

Nope.

And do you have any proof who sketched it.

Of course not!! and i'm pleased you've accepted it's a sketch
The point is,if an art expert says it is a sketch isn't it something important due to the possibility that it could have been the work of the killer.
I mentioned earlier in the thread that it could have been Kelly who sketched it but it remains a possible something that's not been picked up on.Do killers not occasionally leave a clue behind?
We've always wanted physical evidence to discuss,this could end up being so,so why the constant negativity towards it?
I know what i see there and it's changed my thoughts completely.If anyone wishes to ignore it,of course they can do so but that wont make something that has appeared disappear...

[GUT]

Some bunch of super recognisers you've all turned out to be....eyelashes,nasal hair,toes,fingers yet you can't see a picture of a woman's face and a gargoyle??

not really.

Big difference between recognizing something you've seen every day and something someone else claims to see in a pattern, or a cloud or even (dear old Dale) in a painting of flowers.

[GUT]

Would depend who sketched and who signed it dont you think.

Nope.

And do you have any proof who sketched it.

[packers stem]

Even if he signed his little sketch it proves nothing.

Would depend who sketched and who signed it dont you think.
Surprised you all still can't see it... Good job you lot weren't Joe Barnett eh
Some bunch of super recognisers you've all turned out to be....eyelashes,nasal hair,toes,fingers yet you can't see a picture of a woman's face and a gargoyle??

[GUT]

Even if he signed his little sketch it proves nothing.

[GUT]

Then it's a Templars conspiracy. Sorry, my crone eyes see vague nothings that sometimes look like facial hair but I don't see a woman, either on the iPad or iPhone. *sigh*

Nor I.

But I repeat the question I asked earlier....

Even if someone drew in Mary's (well actual McCarthy's) wall SO WHAT?"

[Rosemary]

Let's play "Spot the Baphomet" !

Then it's a Templars conspiracy. Sorry, my crone eyes see vague nothings that sometimes look like facial hair but I don't see a woman, either on the iPad or iPhone. *sigh*

[packers stem]

If I look out of my lounge window, I can see what looks like a jockey , riding a horse, but in reality its only the wind blowing a couple of branches.
Regards Richard,

Hi Richard
I see the scepticism totally. I spotted it Thursday lunchtime and I posted it last night. I thought the same at first..but it's there.It doesn't go away,it's in the picture and once you've spotted it properly it is as clear as anything.
It's not blood splatter, it's not a light anomaly.To me it looks like two sketches.Think maybe it needs enhancing properly and the trained eye of an art historian to decide.
If it was just a one off with nothing around it i wouldn't have posted it but it's two...one above the other

[richardnunweek]

If I look out of my lounge window, I can see what looks like a jockey , riding a horse, but in reality its only the wind blowing a couple of branches.
Regards Richard,

[packers stem]

So now if you're viewing on a mobile you can punch/squeeze the image to the size you want