Originally posted by Michael W Richards
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Did Mary know her killer?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostMaxwell, like Kennedy, like Hutchinson, like Paker is just yet another of many attention seekers who contribute nothing and can't be corroborated by anybody else, of which the Whitechapel investigators had hoards to deal with.
The fact is Mary could only be identified by her eyes and ears by Barnett because her face was so destroyed that it appears no other identification was made so we are just accepting these witnesses know who they are talking about. Maxwell might have been talking about someone else.
Leave a comment:
-
Not only did mary not venture out again after blotchy, she was never planning to.
And she knew her killer.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RockySullivan View PostHi batboy, Was mary a pretty seasoned drinker? What do you make of Maxwell seeing MK throwing up in the am?
The fact is Mary could only be identified by her eyes and ears by Barnett because her face was so destroyed that it appears no other identification was made so we are just accepting these witnesses know who they are talking about. Maxwell might have been talking about someone else.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi batboy, Was mary a pretty seasoned drinker? What do you make of Maxwell seeing MK throwing up in the am?
Leave a comment:
-
After coming home drunk and drinking up a portion of Blotchy's Ale tank, I think even she could have slept through a racket in her room. At best mumble something or in a body's last ditch effort to survive cry murder.
Leave a comment:
-
Before midnight seems early for a girl like MK
If she was passed out someone breaking in the window might not wake her
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Errata View PostI think there is little to no evidence that Mary knew her killer well, if at all. But I think there may be quite a bit of evidence that the killer knew Mary well. Or at least thought he did.
Making him a known person to Mary.
The only possible other access via the door is one that pre-supposes that the killer could open the door, walk across creaky floorboards that Mrs Prater stated allowed her to hear whenever Mary moved about in the room, sneak up onto the bed behind Mary, before she wakes,...and that possibility doesn't address who called out at 3:45 from the court. The windows are a non starter, I don't imagine that anyone could have seen the opportunity to open the door via the latch at almost 4am, Barnett seems to have an accepted alibi,..and even if they figured out the window method you still have the issue of egress without waking Mary. The call, as we know, didn't come from her room specifically...and the witness in the courtyard heard it "as if at her door", while Mrs Prater heard it "as if from the court". Which substantiates a person calling out from her room in the courtyard via the open door.
The safe money is on a scenario that the killer was either granted access to the room with her at 11:45, or she later granted him access.
Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
I think there is little to no evidence that Mary knew her killer well, if at all. But I think there may be quite a bit of evidence that the killer knew Mary well. Or at least thought he did.
Leave a comment:
-
An alcoholic goes to her room at 11:45am with a man carrying a pail of ale. We are to believe she didn't have any and left the room in a walking state after? She's got ger client. She's got her drink. She even has fish and pototoes to wash it down.
For Hutchinson to be true we need an alcoholic to be able to use fish and potatoes to sober up considerably, abstain from her clients drink, sing and walk out again with the capacity to find another punter and go back home.
All her factors without going out are optimal, except she doesn't know who she is really with.
Food - Yep
Booze - Yep
Client - Yep
Sing Song - Yep
What more does she want? Invite people down for a house party?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Robert
In other words, Kelly was walking steadily.
Some people can handle drink better than others. We don't really know what was Kelly's tolerance for alcohol.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Paddy Goose View PostSo one of the soap opera cast knocks on Mary's door, she opens it and screams Oh Murder. And that's how we know she knew her killer? No I don't understand that.
But let me ask you this Michael - When somebody you know knocks on your door do you open it and scream Oh Murder? Often, or just sometimes
And to Jon, Mary was barely able to say hello to Mary Ann, then she sings off and on for over an hour before the lights went out....its eminently feasible to imagine she retired at that point.
Yes, she ate fish and chips, but there is no evidence that would contradict her eating that on the way home.
Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostThe only person who is likely to have gone out and back again checking for possible witnesses is Blotchy who matches Lewis description of the man on Dorset street.
Lewis saw a man, and Blotchy was a man.
Problem is that if Lewis saw Blotchy, she can't have seen Hutch.
Unless Hutch was Blotchy.
But he wasn't.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Batman
Eddowes was so drunk at 8.30 PM that she couldn't stand up, but she was released, sober, at 1 AM and probably could have been released at least half an hour earlier. Cox said Mary was very much intoxicated but also said this :
[Coroner] You say she was drunk ? - I did not notice she was drunk until she said good night.
In other words, Kelly was walking steadily.
Some people can handle drink better than others. We don't really know what was Kelly's tolerance for alcohol.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: