MJK photo 4 enhanced

[Glenn Lauritz Andersson]

What I find telling and interesting with sgh:s excellent enchancement of the MJK full body crime scene photo, is what a real mess it is - and quite a large amount of blood and blood spray on the wall.

All the best

[Sam Flynn]

Hmm? Has anyone ever accused Lizzie Borden of the murders?

... no axe was involved, Mitch

[Mitch Rowe]

Hmm? Has anyone ever accused Lizzie Borden of the murders?

[sgh]

MJK 2nd enhancement - the bed shot

Two images showing the original on the left and my enhanced version to the right, then the same enhanced version below.
Again, as in my MJK3 enhanced shot (wrongly named as MJK4) I have only modified the contrast to enhance the details from a somewhat 'flat' almost grey looking image that doesn't have much 'bite' to it.

Nothing has been added or removed from the original image to produce the enhanced image, I simply worked on what was there and made it more visible.

It would be great to work on a high resolution scan of the original as I'm sure there's much more detail - thus information/clues/understanding to be gleaned from this image.
Tantalizingly, one can see what appears to be smudged finger marks on her right lower leg, but I could be wrong, I'm only guessing!

I do have a bit of a problem though with the injuries to her lower private regions when comparing like for like the two images - MJK3 and this one because I can see what appears to be dark squiggly lines here but not on MJK3 photo in the same location, and those lines do not behave like digital artefacts. The two images just don't seem to jive!
Perhaps somebody with medical knowledge could kindly explain what I'm probably misreading!

Best, Steve

[jmenges]

Steve,

See this page thread for a run down of the different MJK photos and what they are numbered or called.

http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=1821&page=24

JM

[The Grave Maurice]

Wow, sgh, this is really amazing work. That's the clearest version of MJK3 ever. Where have you been all our lives? I look forward to your next posts.

[sgh]

Many thanks Philip.
I knew there was something about the numbering being different to the assigned number to the actual photo. I've taken your advice onboard -it's MJK3.
I have just done the enhancecment of the bed photo of MJK but I'm stumped on it's number so I'll just post it - below here!
Regarding the above MJK3 photo - yes, it's quite surprising what can be revealed within those shadow areas.
A hi res scan of the original would have been great to work on especially on the next photo to follow.


Best, Steve

[George Hutchinson]

Excellent work, sgh. There's things there I hadn't seen before - and not a Baphomet in sight. One thing I hadn't noticed, for example, is the amount of dried blood staining on her little finger. I hope others will post their reactions too.

Just a small point, though - don't be fooled by the number at the bottom right; we call this one MJK3.

PHILIP

[sgh]

Here's my enhanced version of the MJK photo 4.
I've used the image found on this forum as it seems to be reasonably large enough to zoom into before becoming too pixelated, however, to start with
there is quite a bit of compression damage and artefacts apparent in the image to start with.
The image has been lightened to help reveal areas that were previously too dark to make out details , also I've added more contrast to help those available details a little more visible.

Nothing has been added or taken away from the image ie, blemish repairs etc,
because that would then become an individuals subjective decision as to what is real and what is not real.
I hope this is of some value to those who may not have suitable software to do these enhancements.
I have used Adobe photoshop CS3 for this work.

Best, Steve