Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kelly photo 1 enhanced - graphic

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mike Covell
    replied
    Where is Baphomet?

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Robert View Post
    Anna, surely you can't really make out anything on the table? I mean, if I try I can see a hand mirror on it, but that surely must be a visual trick?
    There is a hand mirror on it Robert. With viscera on part of it.

    Cheers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Anna, surely you can't really make out anything on the table? I mean, if I try I can see a hand mirror on it, but that surely must be a visual trick?

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Thats an incredible job Chris, ...its so clear I almost wish it were blurred a bit....some very angry damage done to that woman.

    George, on the arm I agree, I wonder if those two "slashes" on the the left forearm were created before he seems to have worked on the underside of that arm? Like the defensive, bent arm in the air to protect the face kind of wounds? If so, very savage slashes. That flap of skin hanging from the table between her and the bed is the clearest Ive ever seen.

    That poor woman.

    Best regards all.


    edit: It looks to me that her chemise might just have been shoved up when he spreads her legs.....for me that would be an eye opener, because that would certainly be consistent with Jack the Rippers method.
    Last edited by Guest; 11-30-2008, 06:41 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Suzi
    replied
    Sadly Gareth I don't have that one- I don't appear to be able to send pics or else I would try one mi'self

    Suz x

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Please remember that Kelly's head was turned somewhat towards her left cheek. What remains of her face is not "face-on" to us.

    Does anyone have the triptych showing Kelly's face overlaid by a human skull I posted to the boards pre-crash? I'm afraid I've searched my personal archive and not found it.

    Edit: Still no joy, but check out this from the Casebook Archive. The first post on that thread contains some superb reconstructions by David Shields, which are pretty much spot on as far as I'm concerned.
    Last edited by Sam Flynn; 11-30-2008, 05:51 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenda
    replied


    Here's what I mean by the right eye. Surely that's an eye, right? It's glassy like an eye would be. Yet it just looks wrong.

    Sorry, not having much luck getting images to post, so I posted the link instead.
    Edit: YAY I did it!
    Last edited by Brenda; 11-30-2008, 05:32 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenda
    replied
    It looks like he scraped outwards all along the perimeter of the right eye.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenda
    replied
    Mike, that makes perfect sense!
    However, what is going on with her right eye? Was it dislodged? And the left eye - it makes perfect sense that it is located where it should be - but the pupil looks wrong. Do you think he cut her eyelid and her eye is showing through?

    p.s. when I say left and right, I mean HER left and right, not ours.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Covell
    replied
    My Interpretation, sorry for the really bad microsoft paint boxes!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • anna
    replied
    Hi Brenda,


    I think I can see a right eye....with a bushy eyebrow above it,if that helps?




    ANNA.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenda
    replied
    For instance, I think I see two eyes, but then when I sit back and look at them in the context of the facial outline - no, it can't be eyes. Or...is it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenda
    replied
    Yes you can see it better, but when I start trying to make sense of what I am seeing, I always get hopelessly confused. Do you remember on the old boards when some people took the facial photo and drew in what they thought was where? That would be most helpful if some of them could do that again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Jack
    replied
    I was rotating the MJK photo around and I actually think that at this angle, you can actually see her face more clearly. I know it seems impossible that you could see her face but I can actually make out some features. I know people will disagree but I thought i would post it anyway.

    [IMG][/IMG]

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Jack
    replied
    Fantastic photo Chris. It shows up so much more things than before. Thanks for posting

    Best regards

    Adam

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X