Kelly photo 1 enhanced - graphic
Collapse
X
-
Hello Sam!
Thanks a lot, though - in fact - the question was for Simon!
All the best
Jukka
(PS Simon; those are even clearer on Chris's copies!)
Leave a comment:
-
-
Hi All,
There are no body parts on the bedside table in MJK1 and MJK3.
Regards,
Simon
Leave a comment:
-
LOL Did you mean 'Most clear'? I caught that, had to fix it. Sorry.Originally posted by j.r-ahde View PostHello Mike!
The most clearest version so far! Thank you!
However; i hope, you would have cut off the cross-bar of the alleged "crucifix"!
All the best
Jukka
Leave a comment:
-
That is truly disguisting. Heh, but thanks. This really helps with some analysis, though. I love Ripper stuff. I couldn't see a lot of things clearly before and I thank you for this. I wish I'd found this before I wrote my victims analysis. Thank you again.
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=j.r-ahde;56379]
Since the abdomen is on the table, I cannot help saying;
that piece would indicate, that MJK wasn't "stout" in the same meaning as today!
All right, I am the most amateurish on these boards with anatomy, but does anyone agree anyway?!
All the best
Jukka
QUOTE]
I agree with you. Reports describe MJK as a full-figured gal, but I think it meant she was buxom rather than stout. What is left of her shows a slim body structure. Without her ample bosom, she looks quite slim.
Has anyone found that skull photo? I would like to see that for facial reconstruction.
Leave a comment:
-
Lyn, nothing to add but I agree with all that you say here. That hand across her body is a parody of peace, isn't it? Was that how she slept?
I, too, saw blood where others saw a garter.
Sound comments, if disturbing.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello you all!
Since the abdomen is on the table, I cannot help saying;
that piece would indicate, that MJK wasn't "stout" in the same meaning as today!
All right, I am the most amateurish on these boards with anatomy, but does anyone agree anyway?!
All the best
Jukka
(PS. Posting seems to be OK today, thanks, Stephen P.!)
Leave a comment:
-
After seeing Chris' enhanced MJK1 I found myself quickly spellbound by all the comments that followed. I even, after putting my glasses on to have a good look at detail I must have missed before, but still couldn't see what others saw, went to hunt down the magnifying glass that I knew we had in the house, to see what everyone was posting back and forth about. I'm afraid I still can't see what others can see.
What I see (from the close up image of Mary Kelly's garter particularly) is something I saw when I was nursing. A cut made either by a serrated blade or by 'sawing', with blanching on either side of the wound. It's not something I've forgotten, so perhaps that's why I see a resemblance.
To explain, clinically, a couple of self-harmers I saw at the facility where I last worked, one had sliced her thigh with a bread knife, another had sawn back and forth on his arm with a carving knife. Same appearance. Similar blanching.
Yes, well. Apologies for the graphics.
I do disagree with Dr Philips now, however, because from what I can see in the enhanced photo, Mary Kelly had just a sheet around her.
The one thing that continues to strike me, though, no matter how many times I look at the Miller's Court crime scene (MJK1) and no matter how enhanced, my interpretation is that whoever the perpetrator was, they left Mary Kelly looking 'peaceful' -- not peaceful, but 'peaceful'. Does anyone else see that as well?
And I cannot see a crocodile! All I see is flesh in the foreground on the table beside the bed, and a bolster or wrapped up bedding behind it, given the particular photo.Last edited by Lyn; 12-03-2008, 11:32 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Indeed, Stephen - I deliberately played down the table's likely length just to make a point. In terms of the "proscenium" of MJK1, there was plenty of room for Senor Crocodile to lurk in the wings, stage left.Originally posted by Stephen Thomas View PostSam's graphic was fine except that the table was oblong not square.
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: