Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Joe Barnettīs alibi accepted lightly?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Well, no search no sources. That is what I find all the time.
    I was asking if you had a source my dear boy.

    It transpires that you don't have a source.

    What a shame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    I have no intention of doing any searches my dear boy.

    Do you have a reliable source for your statement or not?
    Well, no search no sources. That is what I find all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Does the British Nespaper Archive have a reliable source for it?

    Tell me when you have done your search.
    I have no intention of doing any searches my dear boy.

    Do you have a reliable source for your statement or not?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    Do you have a reliable source or reference for the statement "People used false alibis in 1888 and alibis were of course tested"?
    Does the British Nespaper Archive have a reliable source for it?

    Tell me when you have done your search.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    My dear boy, do you have any source or reference for that statement?
    Do a search in the British Newspaper Archive on the word alibi for the year 1888 and you will find the sources.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Depends on your own opinion probably.
    Do you have a reliable source or reference for the statement "People used false alibis in 1888 and alibis were of course tested"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    Newspapers are reliable source material then?
    Depends on your own opinion probably.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Do a search in the British Newspaper Archive on the word alibi for the year 1888 and you will find the sources.
    Newspapers are reliable source material then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    My dear boy, do you have any source or reference for that statement?
    Do a search in the British Newspaper Archive on the word alibi for the year 1888 and you will find the sources.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    People used false alibis in 1888 and alibis were of course tested.
    My dear boy, do you have any source or reference for that statement?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    [QUOTE=Abby Normal;416044]


    He had an alibi-
    he was playing wisk and was at his boarding house.
    Hi Abby,

    Do you have any source for that statement?

    suspects often get away with false alibis.
    Do you have any reference for that statement?

    Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post
    Why in the world would the police let his alibi go untested or take it lightly when he was the most likely suspect in one of the most gruesome murders in London history?

    c.d.
    Yes, why indeed.

    Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Barnett was a suspect and questioned closely by police. He had an alibi-he was playing wisk and was at his boarding house. plus he didn't act suspiciously-cooperated with police and appeared at the inquest.

    Now that being said. she had recently broken up with her, he was at her place earlier the night of her death, and suspects often get away with false alibis. plus the heart thing. he could have snuck out of his boarding house perhaps in the middle of the night. I still have him on my second tier of suspects.

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Originally posted by harry View Post
    Did Barnett need an alibi?.Doesn't appear he was a suspect,and the fact he gave evidence of residence under oath,might have negated a need for a check.
    Hello Harry,

    He lived with the victim and was her lover with whom he quarreled. Surely that made him a suspect?

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Varqm
    replied
    They would have to know if Barnett can go in and out of Bullers between 2-5 A.M. without somebody knowing.He played whist until half past 12.I do not know about his employment though at that day.
    Blotchy is the better suspect in Kelly's case - he could have returned to Miler's Court to kill. Here is a drunk woman,asleep,alone, who's door can be opened without a key.After the double event it was harder,because of more police, to roam the streets.
    Last edited by Varqm; 05-26-2017, 12:37 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X