Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If you could move one non canonical victim to the canonical 5, who would you move?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • If you could move one non canonical victim to the canonical 5, who would you move?

    And why?

  • #2
    Probably Martha.

    Because I think she is most likely.
    G U T

    There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks

      Also, do use murder research to get newspaper articles on murders?

      Comment


      • #4
        Definitely Tabram because I believe in all likeliness she was killed by Jack.

        Comment


        • #5
          Mackenzie,

          because her inclusion, excludes some suspects, while also possibly strengthening the case for others.

          steve

          Comment


          • #6
            I would be more inclined to Tabram due to the closeness of her murder in weeks to the canonical five than the murder of Mackenzie. Smith is too many months back, and Cole too many years ahead.

            Jeff

            Comment


            • #7
              Martha Tabram, for the reasons given above by others.
              Bond. Greg Bond

              Comment


              • #8
                Martha again for the same reasons. Also Tom Wescott has blown apart the soldier theory in Bank Holiday Murders.


                Miss Marple

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Parker_Pyne79 View Post
                  And why?
                  Alice McKenzie.

                  Wounds produced by left-handed cut (Phillips).

                  It was Jack the Ripper (Monro).

                  Personal data sources matching.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Parker_Pyne79 View Post
                    And why?
                    I would move two-Martha Tabram and McKenzie.
                    Main reason-skirt pushed up on both.
                    and various other similarities.
                    "Is all that we see or seem
                    but a dream within a dream?"

                    -Edgar Allan Poe


                    "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                    quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                    -Frederick G. Abberline

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Tabram, most likely MacKenzie - and all the Thames torso victims.

                      Because I think Tabram was likely a Ripper deed, because I think MacKenzie was likely a Ripper deed - and because I think there can be no serious doubt that the Ripper and the Torso killer were one and the same.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Pierre View Post
                        Alice McKenzie.

                        Wounds produced by left-handed cut (Phillips).

                        It was Jack the Ripper (Monro).

                        Personal data sources matching.
                        I agree and disagree.

                        I agree Alice McKenzie has a great possibility of being killed by the same hand as some of the other victims in this case. I disagree her killer was left handed. The evidence points more toward a right handed killer. I am surprised Dr. Phillips said the wounds were made by a left handed person. Dr. Bond also disagreed with him on that point.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          [QUOTE=jerryd;391945]

                          I agree and disagree.

                          I agree Alice McKenzie has a great possibility of being killed by the same hand as some of the other victims in this case.

                          I disagree her killer was left handed. The evidence points more toward a right handed killer.


                          I am surprised Dr. Phillips said the wounds were made by a left handed person.

                          Dr. Bond also disagreed with him on that point.
                          Hi Jerry,

                          Yes, they did disagree with eachother on the issue of the handedness of the killer.

                          And that is a very important thing.

                          There was a reason for it.

                          Regards, Pierre

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            [QUOTE=Pierre;391989]
                            Originally posted by jerryd View Post



                            Hi Jerry,

                            Yes, they did disagree with eachother on the issue of the handedness of the killer.

                            And that is a very important thing.

                            There was a reason for it.

                            Regards, Pierre
                            I'm guessing you say it it was a conspiracy to cover up for a particular police official. I simply say the evidence points to a right handed killer.

                            So who was lying? Bond or Phillips, according to your hypothesis?

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X