Did BS-man murder Liz Stride?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lynn cates
    Commisioner
    • Aug 2009
    • 13841

    #751
    flashing thingy

    Hello All. To put the Schwartz story into perspective, go here:



    Click through until you get the red dot (Liz) and the green dot (BSM). If they were turned 180 degrees (ie, Liz on the right and BSM on the left), I'd LOVE the story. But they are not. (See where/how her body lay.)

    If BS man existed, he killed Liz. But the orientation is all wrong for her murder. BS did NOT kill her. So, by modus tollens . . .

    Cheers.
    LC

    Comment

    • Hunter
      Chief Inspector
      • Dec 2009
      • 1745

      #752
      Swanson noted the possibility of so-called BS man's existence and the possibility of her still being killed by someone else. Of course, he thought her a prostitute.

      But what did he know, eh? He was just going by the police investigation.
      Best Wishes,
      Hunter
      ____________________________________________

      When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888

      Comment

      • lynn cates
        Commisioner
        • Aug 2009
        • 13841

        #753
        wasted

        Hello Cris. Thanks.

        Precisely. His obvious talents were wasted behind a desk.

        Cheers.
        LC

        Comment

        • drstrange169
          Superintendent
          • Feb 2008
          • 2409

          #754
          "Click through until you get the red dot (Liz) and the green dot (BSM)..."

          Of course, the position of the yellow dot is a big controversy too.
          dustymiller
          aka drstrange

          Comment

          • The Good Michael
            Assistant Commissioner
            • Feb 2008
            • 3773

            #755
            Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
            Hello All. To put the Schwartz story into perspective, go here:



            Click through until you get the red dot (Liz) and the green dot (BSM). If they were turned 180 degrees (ie, Liz on the right and BSM on the left), I'd LOVE the story. But they are not. (See where/how her body lay.)

            If BS man existed, he killed Liz. But the orientation is all wrong for her murder. BS did NOT kill her. So, by modus tollens . . .

            Because green and red dots tell the story? There isn't enough information from what Schwartz saw, to explain everything that happened. If you go by the simple idea that Stride was thrown down and then...nothing, we could suggest that Stride picked herself up, met with a man from the Club, who then killed her in the yard. But that would be adding way too much to the story; would make it completely more complex than it probably was... and silly.

            Mike
            huh?

            Comment

            • Rosella
              Chief Inspector
              • Sep 2014
              • 1542

              #756
              PC Lamb was asked at the inquest on Stride whether he had seen anything suspicious that night. He said he hadn't at any time, "...There were squabbles and rows in the streets, but nothing more".

              How do we know that what Schwartz saw wasn't just one of those 'rows', a common or garden domestic that had nothing to do with Stride? Of course it appears to be close to the time of the murder when he saw BS and the woman but how sure was Schwartz of the time? Did he have a watch?

              Comment

              • harry
                *
                • Mar 2008
                • 2778

                #757
                Lynn,I don't get your point.If SChwartz is correct ,two persons are in close proximity to a murder scene.He does not see her killed,and he nor any other witness can testify to what happened after Schw artz departed.What makes BS a more likely killer?

                Comment

                • The Good Michael
                  Assistant Commissioner
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 3773

                  #758
                  Originally posted by Rosella View Post
                  How do we know that what Schwartz saw wasn't just one of those 'rows', a common or garden domestic that had nothing to do with Stride? Of course it appears to be close to the time of the murder when he saw BS and the woman but how sure was Schwartz of the time? Did he have a watch?
                  Rosella,

                  There is such a small window of time between Schwartz and Diemschitz that it almost doesn't matter how exact Schwartz was.

                  Mike
                  huh?

                  Comment

                  • Rosella
                    Chief Inspector
                    • Sep 2014
                    • 1542

                    #759
                    That still doesn't mean that the woman Schwartz saw was Stride. We live in a world where domestics and other rows don't spill out onto the street. They didn't!

                    Comment

                    • The Good Michael
                      Assistant Commissioner
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 3773

                      #760
                      Originally posted by Rosella View Post
                      That still doesn't mean that the woman Schwartz saw was Stride. We live in a world where domestics and other rows don't spill out onto the street. They didn't!
                      In my world, there is a lot of street spillage. I was simply answering the issue of time you brought up and not addressing anything else.

                      Mike
                      huh?

                      Comment

                      • Batman
                        Superintendent
                        • Jan 2013
                        • 2931

                        #761
                        One must remember that the incomplete Whitechapel files and the media including the home office referred to witnesses plural seeing Stride attacked.

                        The problem is that several of them don't appear at the inquest. We can only speculate why but I think it was surpressed because of the Lipski antisemitic comment (which appeared in a newspaper when a Journalist got to Schwartz anyhow). The blowback from the Pizer incident plus the GSG probably scared Warren into having this stuff not made public for public safety.
                        Bona fide canonical and then some.

                        Comment

                        • lynn cates
                          Commisioner
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 13841

                          #762
                          location

                          Hello Dusty. Thanks.

                          Of course, I was pleasantly surprised to find it EXACTLY where I had always imagined it.

                          Cheers.
                          LC

                          Comment

                          • lynn cates
                            Commisioner
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 13841

                            #763
                            mud and water

                            Hello Michael. Thanks.

                            But silliest of ALL is to imagine Liz "thrown down" without mud or water marking the place where her dress came into contact with the ground.

                            Cheers.
                            LC

                            Comment

                            • lynn cates
                              Commisioner
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 13841

                              #764
                              tempus fugit

                              Hello Harry. Thanks.

                              "If Schwartz is correct, two persons are in close proximity to a murder scene. He does not see her killed, and he nor any other witness can testify to what happened after Schwartz departed. What makes BS a more likely killer?"

                              Proximity in time. This event is supposed to be 12.45. A PC was reached just before 1.00. The lads would need to have been dispatched around 12.55 (or sooner). Now don't forget Dimshits and his stopping, lighting a match, prodding, dismounting and going into the club. And, above all, BS actually killing after the initial altercation.

                              It's all a matter of time.

                              IF BS existed, THEN he killed Liz.

                              Cheers.
                              LC

                              Comment

                              • lynn cates
                                Commisioner
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 13841

                                #765
                                Diesen Kuss der ganzen . . . Michael.

                                Hello Michael.

                                "There is such a small window of time between Schwartz and Diemschitz that it almost doesn't matter how exact Schwartz was."

                                Mmmwah!

                                Cheers.
                                LC

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X