If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Corpses often look different to the person in life - - the facial muscles change. Also does not the nose often become "sharper"/more evident in a corpse?
Have you ever been confronted by one or more new person/s? This happens to me when I have a day off and act as substitute for a local school district. I have about 125 students in a day. Can I confuse one with another? Yes.
Can you see someone for a few seconds and misidentify later? I think so.
Cheers.
LC
The woman wore two Dahlias, one red and one white, that in itself must narrow the field. Add to this the build, the height, the clothing and the features, at what point do we say "enough!"
Can you see someone for a few seconds and misidentify later? I think so.
It was more than a few seconds.
Best, Gardner and friend were watching and taking the p#ss out of the couple for a few minutes, even passing them as they walked into the pub.
Dahlia`s, roses.... despite his name, we shouldn`t be too specific about what type of flower Gardner and friends, all young East End dockers, claimed the woman was wearing.
He could equally have been inside the yard out of view to Schwartz. By this I mean, we have always assumed Stride was in the gateway alone, though we have no good indication of this.
Stride had never been seen alone that night up to this point, she was always with someone. So who is to say she was not with a man in the shadows of the gateway when BSman staggered passed?
Was this the reason for the aggravation, BSman saw her with another man?
Hi Jon,
It's entirely possible, in which case the hidden man would have had good reason to stay well in the shadows waiting for BS man to bugger off, and he'd have had the huge advantage of killing her just after BS man had allowed himself to be seen manhandling the victim by not one but two witnesses.
Love,
Caz
X
"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
"The woman wore two Dahlias, one red and one white, that in itself must narrow the field."
not all have described it that way. And one reported white AND red.
Indeed, Spooner did if I'm not mistaken "red and white flowers". Reid called it a "Red Rose", Blackwell (and Packer?) a Geranium (who both likely know as much about flowers as I do), and B & G along with the Daily News - "two Dahlias".
Have you seen the list of coincidences between Liz and Mrs. Watts?
Impressive.
In a word, yes!
(And I'd like G & B MUCH better without the "Leather Apron" remarks--sounds contrived.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by caz Tell this to Mike Richards. His contention was that Stride didn’t dip into her sixpence to secure a bed because she had no intention of returning there that night. He argues that the sixpence went on her flower and cachous to make herself more attractive to the man she thought would be meeting her at the club and whisking her off somewhere. If there is evidence that she paid for a bed up front, fully intending to return after whatever business she had at the club, bang goes Mike’s theory. But the fact remains that she was penniless when found dead, and therefore entirely without funds for her next meal or drink, even if she had lined up a bed with her name on it.
Love,
Caz
X
She left the lodging house with 6d and without flowers on her breast and any cashous that we hear of...and later she is found without that money and with the flower arrangement and the cashous. So, hardly conjecture without any foundation. Which of course suggesting a Ripper for this killing would be. I would be very surprised if the cost of those 2 items at the time exceeded 6d.
Hi Mike,
You need to address this to DRoy and Lynn, who both suggested that Stride had booked and paid for a bed that night before hitting the streets. Either you or they are wrong about this.
You suggest I insert a lot of theory when I make a post Caz, when in fact anything that I have proposed has foundation somewhere in the accepted evidence.
Again, if there is evidence that Stride had a bed lined up, how would that affect your theory about her intention not to return that night?
Your choice of a dramatic variance in MO for the Berner Street Killer, (since you assume this killing was done by the same person who killed the first 2 Canonicals), and your belief that Liz Stride was a street prostitute...are 2 theories which are both purely speculatory and without provenance in any known evidence.
Where have I stated it as my 'belief' that Stride was on the game? I merely allow for the possibility, but I don't let the issue cloud my judgement regarding who didn't kill her. The ripper could still have done it if she wasn't (or was) offering sexual services; someone else could have done it if she was (or wasn't).
I'm not the one slamming doors shut on all the reasonable possibilities and only leaving myself with one for which I have no evidence whatsoever.
It's entirely possible, in which case the hidden man would have had good reason to stay well in the shadows waiting for BS man to bugger off, and he'd have had the huge advantage of killing her just after BS man had allowed himself to be seen manhandling the victim by not one but two witnesses.
Love,
Caz
X
Well hello my dear, nice to see you.
Yes, I'm wondering if we cannot see the wood for the trees. I initially threw that out as a hypothesis, but more and more I am warming to the idea.
The man seen by Smith being thee most likely suspect.
"You need to address this to DRoy and Lynn, who both suggested that Stride had booked and paid for a bed that night before hitting the streets."
Where did I suggest this? Quite the contrary. She did NOT pay her doss, though able. A fact pointed out at inquest.
Perhaps a glimpse into her thinking that night?
Cheers.
LC
Lynn,
In my absence thanks for addressing the comment made by Caz.....I have always maintained that the fact that Liz did not pay for her bed before leaving the lodging house, confirmed by the landlady at the Inquest, while she was in possession of the money to do so, could indicate that she had other plans for that night....but that they may have been hopeful rather than confirmed. The reason I say that is because she did not state definitively that she would not be returning that night...but she was also found later wearing clothing and with accessories that suggest she had a social meeting of some sort arranged for later that night.
She is found without alcohol in her system, neatly dressed and fully covered, with the mints and the maidenfern. Since she seems to spend some time lingering around the club after 12:3o my suspicions are that she was waiting for someone to come outside, or possibly she was waiting for someone to return. Which could indicate a client for her cleaning services, she was at that time at work "among the Jews"...or a date.
...but she was also found later wearing clothing and with accessories that suggest she had a social meeting of some sort arranged for later that night.
She was wearing the same clothes that she did the cleaning with that afternoon.
Comment