6d. Did Liz spend it, or die for it?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • curious4
    Chief Inspector
    • Mar 2010
    • 1749

    #91
    Yes, boar (or other animal of your choice) bristle.

    Comment

    • curious4
      Chief Inspector
      • Mar 2010
      • 1749

      #92
      Hair broom

      To elucidate, animal rather than vegetable.

      Comment

      • RivkahChaya
        Inspector
        • Aug 2012
        • 1382

        #93
        Originally posted by curious4 View Post
        Yes, boar (or other animal of your choice) bristle.
        What animal, other than a boar, produced hair that was stiff enough to make bristles? not saying none does, just can't imagine a rabbit-fur broom.

        Comment

        • curious4
          Chief Inspector
          • Mar 2010
          • 1749

          #94
          Think we're getting a little silly now, just rabbiting on for the sake of it lol

          Could have been a broom for sweeping up hair, I suppose. Could Mrs D have been a hairdresser?
          Last edited by curious4; 01-27-2013, 05:56 PM.

          Comment

          • curious4
            Chief Inspector
            • Mar 2010
            • 1749

            #95
            Hair broom

            In case anyone else is curious (lol), a hairbroom was a broom made from wood and horsehair, sometimes goat hair.

            www.victorianlondon.org/.../cassells-23.htm -
            c.1880s [no date] - Servants of the House - (1) Domestic Servants and their Duties ....www.victorianlondon.org/.../cassells-23.htm...:


            Timespanner: Street Stories 22: The broom maker
            timespanner.blogspot.com/.../street-stories-22-... -
            7 jan 2012 – ... manufactured brushes and brooms, using both local (horsehair and .... in the early and the late 1880s (one of Lawrence's children, however,

            or Google hair broom from 1880s.

            So now we know. A little off thread but my obsessive gene kicked in here.

            Best wishes,
            C4

            Comment

            • curious4
              Chief Inspector
              • Mar 2010
              • 1749

              #96
              Hello Lynn,

              Missed the Mayfair crone bit on the first time round but I must protest on behalf of all crones! Mayfair matrons were picked not just for their good breeding, but for being good breeders. Once a week and think of England - never! And the chances were they were still lively up to a good old age - aided and abetted by a majestic butler or handsome footman if his lordship`s syphilis was giving him gyp, I suspect. Heard of the naughty nineties?

              All good wishes,
              Gwyneth/C4

              Comment

              • RivkahChaya
                Inspector
                • Aug 2012
                • 1382

                #97
                Originally posted by curious4 View Post
                Mayfair matrons were picked not just for their good breeding, but for being good breeders.
                Well, if you are really, really fertile, you could get away with doing it once every ten months, and have a houseful of future nobles.

                Comment

                • curious4
                  Chief Inspector
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1749

                  #98
                  Every ten months

                  All depends on whether his lordship was firing blanks, of course! Which is where the butler came in....

                  Comment

                  • lynn cates
                    Commisioner
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 13841

                    #99
                    Alisoun

                    Hello Gwyneth. Thanks.

                    Are you thinking of the Wife of Bath again? (heh-heh)

                    Cheers.
                    LC

                    Comment

                    • curious4
                      Chief Inspector
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 1749

                      #100
                      Wife of Bath

                      Hello Lynn,

                      Never off my mind. But I am not gat-toothed, sadly.

                      Gwyneth

                      Comment

                      • RivkahChaya
                        Inspector
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 1382

                        #101
                        Originally posted by curious4 View Post
                        All depends on whether his lordship was firing blanks, of course! Which is where the butler came in....
                        This is true. Wow. Being married to an infertile peer before about 1910 would have really sucked, since up until about then, men were not infertile as long as they produced fluid, so the woman must be barren, but you kept praying and trying, and getting dirty looks from the in-laws.

                        I don't know whether that sucked more than being pregnant every couple of years or not.

                        Yes, I know which choice would suck more now, but I'm talking back when you had to take cultural considerations-- no, wait, considering risk of death during birth, I guess I'll go with "pregnancy every two years."

                        "Sorry dear, not tonight; I've got a meeting with Mrs. Pankhurst in the morning."

                        Comment

                        • lynn cates
                          Commisioner
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 13841

                          #102
                          Now I get it.

                          Hello Rivkah.

                          "Being married to an infertile peer before about 1910 would have really sucked."

                          That explains the infertility, then? (heh-heh)

                          Cheers.
                          LC

                          Comment

                          • RivkahChaya
                            Inspector
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 1382

                            #103
                            Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
                            Hello Rivkah.

                            "Being married to an infertile peer before about 1910 would have really sucked."

                            That explains the infertility, then? (heh-heh)

                            Cheers.
                            LC
                            Wow. That would have been difficult to explain to mother.

                            "Maybe next year, mother. There's lots of time; the wind just hasn't blown in our favor yet."

                            Then I start giggling uncontrollably, and he kicks me under the table.

                            Comment

                            • lynn cates
                              Commisioner
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 13841

                              #104
                              language game

                              Hello Rivkah. Thanks. A strange thing is language.

                              Cheers.
                              LC

                              Comment

                              • Hunter
                                Chief Inspector
                                • Dec 2009
                                • 1745

                                #105
                                Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
                                Hello Rivkah.

                                "Being married to an infertile peer before about 1910 would have really sucked."

                                That explains the infertility, then? (heh-heh)
                                I just spewed my drink all over the monitor... one of the best one liners I've seen of late.
                                Best Wishes,
                                Hunter
                                ____________________________________________

                                When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X