Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Stride Really a JtR Victim?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    So both on the same day? In which case, a newsman looks like the writer of the card.
    Saucy Jack didn`t arrive at the Central News Agency until 1st Oct.

    I suppose it could have been someone connected to the Star. But they didn`t track Schwartz down until early evening on Sunday at best.
    That`s a bit tight in making the post for Monday so looks like the author was someone connected to Schwartz, or the killer. Id say it was more likely to be the killer as the author refers to the ears from the Dear boss letter.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Not sure how we get from an oxymoron to a squeal?
    It`s like I`m sitting next to you during a presentation at the Ripper Conference and I`m continually poking you in the ribs for fun, and you finally object in some vocal manner.

    Later, I`m at the bar and I`m regaling everyone of my antics during the presentation and I say "yeah, till Lynn squealed and Adam Wood asked me to leave"

    Perhaps, it`s an English thing?

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    In the news.

    Hello (again) Jon. Thanks.

    "Schwartz gave his statement on Sunday afternoon . . .

    Saucy Jack was posted Sunday. . ."

    So both on the same day? In which case, a newsman looks like the writer of the card.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Can't get there from here.

    Hello Jon. Thanks.

    "I think it means three screams that were not very loud."

    Oxymoron.

    Not sure how we get from an oxymoron to a squeal?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Well, we certainly have no record of Liz squealing).
    Yes, we do.

    --unless you refer to the three not loud screams (whatever that means).
    I think it means three screams that were not very loud.

    To "finish straight off" indicates, in my humble opinion, the inability to kill at once. And, yes, Liz bled to death, possibly slower than the others.
    Exactly.

    But how much of this had made the rounds? Next day or two, one paper was already proclaiming an interruption.
    Schwartz gave his statement on Sunday afternoon, and it appeared in the papers on 1st Oct

    Saucy Jack was posted Sunday and arrived at The Central News Agency on 1st Oct.

    How did Saucy Jack know number one squealed a bit?

    Leave a comment:


  • DRoy
    replied
    Mike,

    Neither can Schwartz be supported except in the details of his story which are unlikely to have been manufactured. He was passing the location, but it wasn't a murder scene yet, so his testimony has no direct connection to the murder. Schwartz should not be dismissed. That would be a foolish thing to do.
    You're saying Schwartz's 'testimony' (perhaps we should use statement here?) has no connection to the murder but he should not be dismissed. Can I ask what you mean?

    Cheers
    DRoy

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    making the rounds

    Hello Jon. Thanks.

    Well, we certainly have no record of Liz squealing--unless you refer to the three not loud screams (whatever that means).

    To "finish straight off" indicates, in my humble opinion, the inability to kill at once. And, yes, Liz bled to death, possibly slower than the others.

    But how much of this had made the rounds? Next day or two, one paper was already proclaiming an interruption.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Permit a disagreement. IF the "Dear Boss" were real, and the killer killed Kate only, why could he not write the "Saucy Jacky" merely to take credit?
    How would he know that number one squealed a bit and couldn`t finish straight off?

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by Digalittledeeperwatson View Post
    So... Wait I don't think there is anything to support Schwartz being there either. Curious.
    Absolute canard there. Nobody was at any of the murder scenes except the victims and the killer. So nothing supports anyone's testimony. Neither can Schwartz be supported except in the details of his story which are unlikely to have been manufactured. He was passing the location, but it wasn't a murder scene yet, so his testimony has no direct connection to the murder. Schwartz should not be dismissed. That would be a foolish thing to do.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    no cold turkey

    Hello David.

    "3 weeks without any murder. Then no murder until Nov 9, indoors."

    Perhaps he was trying to taper off? (heh-heh)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    "Out of the blue."

    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    "Still, random man walking down street, pulls over to assault and slit woman's throat out of the blue on a whim has gotta go."

    Well, that's about how it looks.

    Some have postulated that they had been together earlier that evening. He had left, then doubled back to resume a conversation with Liz.

    To me, does not "feel" quite right.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    3 weeks without any murder.
    Then no murder until Nov 9, indoors.
    Discarding Stride (or Eddowes, as Arnold did) is the grossest mistake one can make.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    point noted

    I would say translation of his interpretation of events. Still, random man walking down street, pulls over to assault and slit woman's throat out of the blue on a whim has gotta go. And there is nothing to support Killer Kidney being there. So... Wait I don't think there is anything to support Schwartz being there either. Curious.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    list-less

    Hello (again) DLDW.

    "Is there a list of the members of the IWC?"

    Well, many have sought this for some time. Tom Wescott has suggested looking through employer's lists of sweat shop workers.

    "If so would someone give me the helpful finger?"

    I could give you the finger--not certain it would be helpful (heh-heh).

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    suggestive

    Hello DLDW.

    "isn't it more likely that "JTR" or some club related thing occurred than just some random well executed murder or domestic assault that has nothing to suggest either?"

    Well, doesn't Israel's story suggest something similar to that? So if one can believe his story . . . Why not?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X