From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts.

[Trevor Marriott]

I did another version, this time overlaid with a spatial analysis of the C5 crime locations (referred to as a "geoprofile" in the press and movies).

Rather than put the times he would have to stay at home, I've indicated the amount of time he would have to be travelling. It starts at 9 minutes (yah, odd I know), because of how I originally coded things in terms of the minimum wait time (0 minutes), and worked down to the maximum wait time, and since the start time is 1:41, and the end times either 2:20 or 2:55, the travel times are not "nice" numbers.

Anyway, so the "9" ring means JtR's total travel time is 9 minutes, and the 54 ring indicates he would be traveling (from Mitre Square to there and then back again to Goulston Street) for 54 minutes. I thought this would be a bit more useful as then the ring times don't reflect an assumption about when the apron got dropped off. Also, it might be useful to consider how long JtR would be out and about after having committed at least 1 and maybe 2 murders.

Goulston Street is the Green 6 pointed star. This map also shows some of the other Whitechapel murder locations, so people can consider them as well. It also details some of the various suspects that have been mentioned too (Chapman, though, wasn't living in the indicated location at the time of the JtR crimes, but apparently he was at Cable Street, but I've left that marker there for interest; Also, directly above Kelly's murder location near the edge of the map is a marker for Peabody house. There is no known suspect there, but I had misidentified that location as where Hutchinson was living as it was a boarding house type place. I've left it in because of how it falls in the spatial analysis's region of interest, and because it was low-rent and many single men lived there, so why not?)

I think the take home message is, given the amount of time between 1:41 and the apron's discovery at 2:55, giving JtR 74 minutes to travel, the area that he could potentially have a bolt hole is pretty large! So, I'm sure everyone will be able to argue their favorite suspect "fits".

I think what interests me somewhat is how, if you consider the highest areas of interest (the white and yellow regions; say half way between Kelly and Chapman), then it would suggest JtR walked much less when leaving to discard the apron than he did to get home. That makes a bit of sense to me as he would not want to get too close to the crime scene, and he would not want to be back outside for too long. That area looks to require about 19 minutes total travel, with the Mitre Square - bolt hole leg being roughly twice the proposed "bolt hole to Goulston Street". That makes the first leg roughly 12 m 40 seconds, and the second leg 6m 20 seconds (plus the same amount to return after discarding it). And that, of course, would suggest that he might consider 12-13 minutes an "acceptable risk" to be exposed? I'm just running with things here (some would say running with scissors I suppose), so don't think I'm insisting this must be the case. Heck, I'm not even convinced the spatial analysis is picking up on JtR per se, but may instead be picking up on spatial similarities of the victims themselves, in which case the spatial analysis is a red herring. Still, that doesn't mean it isn't an interesting idea to consider, at least I think it is.

- Jeff

Hi Jeff

Excellent work but I personally do not subscribe to the suggestion that he had a bolt hole and went home and then came out again, that would be an act whereby he would be unnecessarily risking being stopped by the police and apprehended, after all he was not to know that someone somewhere had seen him and given the police a description of him, or simply risking being stopped and checked.

Looking at the murder locations on the map, it has also to be considered that he made good his escape as soon as possible from each murder putting as much distance as possible between him and each murder. Each of the murder locations as can be seen is very close to a major thoroughfare with the exception of Stride, but of course there is doubt as to whether she was a ripper victim, so that being said it would have been more sensible for him to simply make his way quickly to one of the major thoroughfares and simply blended in with the early morning pedestrians before the bodies were discovered and the hue and cry went out

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[JeffHamm]

I did another version, this time overlaid with a spatial analysis of the C5 crime locations (referred to as a "geoprofile" in the press and movies).

Rather than put the times he would have to stay at home, I've indicated the amount of time he would have to be travelling. It starts at 9 minutes (yah, odd I know), because of how I originally coded things in terms of the minimum wait time (0 minutes), and worked down to the maximum wait time, and since the start time is 1:41, and the end times either 2:20 or 2:55, the travel times are not "nice" numbers.

Anyway, so the "9" ring means JtR's total travel time is 9 minutes, and the 54 ring indicates he would be traveling (from Mitre Square to there and then back again to Goulston Street) for 54 minutes. I thought this would be a bit more useful as then the ring times don't reflect an assumption about when the apron got dropped off. Also, it might be useful to consider how long JtR would be out and about after having committed at least 1 and maybe 2 murders.

Goulston Street is the Green 6 pointed star. This map also shows some of the other Whitechapel murder locations, so people can consider them as well. It also details some of the various suspects that have been mentioned too (Chapman, though, wasn't living in the indicated location at the time of the JtR crimes, but apparently he was at Cable Street, but I've left that marker there for interest; Also, directly above Kelly's murder location near the edge of the map is a marker for Peabody house. There is no known suspect there, but I had misidentified that location as where Hutchinson was living as it was a boarding house type place. I've left it in because of how it falls in the spatial analysis's region of interest, and because it was low-rent and many single men lived there, so why not?)

I think the take home message is, given the amount of time between 1:41 and the apron's discovery at 2:55, giving JtR 74 minutes to travel, the area that he could potentially have a bolt hole is pretty large! So, I'm sure everyone will be able to argue their favorite suspect "fits".

I think what interests me somewhat is how, if you consider the highest areas of interest (the white and yellow regions; say half way between Kelly and Chapman), then it would suggest JtR walked much less when leaving to discard the apron than he did to get home. That makes a bit of sense to me as he would not want to get too close to the crime scene, and he would not want to be back outside for too long. That area looks to require about 19 minutes total travel, with the Mitre Square - bolt hole leg being roughly twice the proposed "bolt hole to Goulston Street". That makes the first leg roughly 12 m 40 seconds, and the second leg 6m 20 seconds (plus the same amount to return after discarding it). And that, of course, would suggest that he might consider 12-13 minutes an "acceptable risk" to be exposed? I'm just running with things here (some would say running with scissors I suppose), so don't think I'm insisting this must be the case. Heck, I'm not even convinced the spatial analysis is picking up on JtR per se, but may instead be picking up on spatial similarities of the victims themselves, in which case the spatial analysis is a red herring. Still, that doesn't mean it isn't an interesting idea to consider, at least I think it is.

- Jeff

[JeffHamm]

Good thoughts. I would always defer to PC Long NOT having missed it. It was a new beat, and when a beat is new, you pay special attention to things. Particularly after he might have heard word on the street about Stride's murder. Question is, how long did the Ripper spend at his bolthole before leaving again to drop off the apron? Five minutes or thirty? I would say when you construct your scenario, give the Ripper five minutes at his bolthole and stop short five minutes before the discovery of the apron, and then try to figure the furthest away he could have traveled on foot. But not as the crow flies because he didn't fly. he had to travel roads and alleys. Frankly, I don't even know how a project like this would be attempted. You might drive yourself mad! But I would certainly enjoy seeing the results.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

Hi,

Ok, was able to get a bit of this done. What I've plotted below are various maximum distances for the bolt hole if JtR drops the apron just after PC Long's 2:20 patrol.

PC Harvey appears to have patrolled Church Passage around 1:41, and that is often used as the event that causes JtR to leave Mitre Square. So, if he leaves Mitre Square (A) at 1:41 and is in Goulston Street (B) at 2:20 to discard the apron, that gives him 39 minutes to get from A to B. At an average walking speed, it would only take about 5 or 6 minutes, giving him as much as 33 extra minutes to go to a proposed bolt hole (C).

So he could have as much as 39 minutes to go from A to C to B. If he goes inside and waits 5 minutes, then he only has 34 minutes available to travel. The longer he says inside, the less time he can be on the move, and so the smaller the area that could contain his bolt hole becomes.

All I've done is calculated the distance going from A to each pixel on the map and then to B, all distances measured "as the crow flies" (straight lines). That underestimates the real distance one has to travel though, because the streets aren't straight lines. So, I calculated the straightline distance between Mitre Square and Berner Street, then I calculate the distance along the streets, which is roughly 1.45 times the straight line distance. I calculated how much time it would require to walk the street route at 3.2 mph, and then calculated the speed one would have to walk the straight line distance in order to take the same amount of time. That came out to be 2.2 mph.

As a quick double check, it takes 5-6 minutest to walk from Mitre Squre to Goulston Street along the roads. At 3.2 mph, though, it would only take 4.5 minutes along the straight line but when I used the "correction speed" of 2.2 mph, the straight line time is around 6.5 or so minutes, so it seems like a reasonable estimate to use.

Anyway, I've put the "at home times" on the different borders. So the 30 border means "If JtR stayed inside for 30 minutes before heading to Goulston Street" this is the maximum distance away his bolt hole could be (it could be anywhere inside that oval). If he only stayed inside for 25 minutes, then we consider the 2nd biggest oval, and I just kept plotting them until we get to the limit of spending 0 minutes in his bolt hole.

Unfortunately, I made the initial map image a bit small and it cuts off some of the "regions of interest" to the south, but one gets the idea I think.

Now, if JtR drops the apron later than 2:20 (with an upper limit of 2:55, which is when PC Long finds it), then one would just add more and more ovals, expanding the potential area in which his bolt hole could be. If you think JtR would travel faster than average walking speed, expand the borders, but if you think he might have travelled more slowly (i.e. checking the cost is clear, taking his time, etc), you would shrink things.

In the end, given we don't know how long he was inside, we would want to consider the largest area, which as you can see, is pretty big. Even if you think he would have to have taken at least 5 minutes to wash up, etc, it is still a fairly large search space.

Given that the Chapman murder could have been committed as the sun was coming up (Yes, I know not everyone agrees on that), it does seem to me that would suggest JtR probably felt comfortable enough to kill her because he could get home and out of sight very quickly. (Obviously, he might have felt comfortable simply because he was mad as a hatter too, these are speculative ideas, not facts after all). If so, then we might want to start by focusing on areas between the 5 and 30 minute "wait times" that are also near Hanbury Street.

And what's interesting about that (at least to me), is that many of the spatial analyses that I've plotted before (the geographical profiling stuff), tends to emphasize areas between the Kelly and Chapman crime scenes and up in that same area.

On the other hand, if he did live up around Hanbury Street, heading back to Goulston Street from there would be more or less heading straight back towards the crime scene, and the longer he's inside, the more likely that area is going to be swarming with police (so it seems like an odd decision). Also, it results in the Mitre Square to Goulston Street vector to be pointing towards him (though of course he may not have been quite as aware of that as we are, given we're looking at a map and he would be in the maze of streets).

The "more clever" JtR might want to place the apron such that it points in the "wrong" direction, so we might then want to have a 2nd area of particular interest, I would suggest to the North West, between the 25 and 10 minute waits (the idea being he heads away from Mitre Square when leaving, but when going to Goulston he's not really heading directly towards the crime scene but rather skirting above it until he gets to the far side to create his NE pointer that directs the search away from his bolt hole).

I suppose one could also take the distance between Mitre Square and Goulston Street to represent how close to the crime scene JtR feels comfortable getting (any closer and the risk is too high), and therefore, it may also reflect roughly how far away from his bolt hole he would want to get rid of the apron (any closer and the risk is too high). If you consider that a reasonable idea, then you would reduce the priority of areas that fall inside a circle centred on Goulston Street, and with GS-Mitre Square representing the radius.

Again, these sorts of suggestions are just that, suggestions, they aren't facts, they are speculations that are derived by considering the areas mapped out, and factoring in different possible decisions that JtR might have had to make. I'm sure others can think of additional ways to interpret this, and sharing those ideas is always a good thing.

These may generate some new ideas, which is what they are intended to do. Enjoy.

- Jeff

[Ms Diddles]

Since Goulston Street is so close to Mitre Square and Jeff Hamm's research and cited research suggests that the murderer lived near Goulston Street, then that would seem to lend credence both to my suggestion that the murderer could have gone home first before depositing the apron and another member's suggestion that he went home in between the two murders committed that night.

Yeah, I would agree that is indeed a possibility worthy of consideration.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

Since Goulston Street is so close to Mitre Square and Jeff Hamm's research and cited research suggests that the murderer lived near Goulston Street, then that would seem to lend credence both to my suggestion that the murderer could have gone home first before depositing the apron and another member's suggestion that he went home in between the two murders committed that night.

[Ms Diddles]

Could not agree with you more Ms Diddles. I really could not believe how close they were. Heading back from Mitre square and toward Whitechapel I walked into Goulston street practically by accident. Seems like the natural route as it were if you are avoiding the main streets!

I had never been to Whitechapel before so followed the suggested route in the Edgar's Guide.

It was all a bit of a blur, and I think I'd need to do it again to really grasp how the sites all relate to each other geographically, but I do recall being surprised to suddenly find myself in The City so close to all the Whitechapel sites.

It's a good excuse to go back one day!

[Losmandris]

Oh no!

Here we go again.

2.5 minutes then if you move pretty fast?


(Google maps puts it at a 5 minute walk, so if someone was running Losmandris would be spot on with his "couple of minutes" estimation).

I walked it myself last year and was quite surprised at how close the sites all are relative to each other

Could not agree with you more Ms Diddles. I really could not believe how close they were. Heading back from Mitre square and toward Whitechapel I walked into Goulston street practically by accident. Seems like the natural route as it were if you are avoiding the main streets!

[Ms Diddles]

It can't be done in two minutes.

Oh no!

Here we go again.

2.5 minutes then if you move pretty fast?


(Google maps puts it at a 5 minute walk, so if someone was running Losmandris would be spot on with his "couple of minutes" estimation).

I walked it myself last year and was quite surprised at how close the sites all are relative to each other

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

It takes a couple of minutes to get from Mitre Square to Goulston street, especially if you are running.

It can't be done in two minutes.

[Darryl Kenyon]

Just in terms of the murderer heading to a 'bolt hole' can someone explain why would he have supposedly done this? Why risk going back out onto the streets? To plant the apron and write the graffiti? Seems like planning to me? If so why something so subtle? If he had thought about doing this all along as posted earlier why not take Eddowes hat or something more obvious? And why is the apron smeared in blood? So he has wiped his hands/knife on it, taken it back with him waited for a bit then placed it later on after scrawling this non sensical/cryptic graffiti?

Too far a stretch for me. the apron is the closest thing he has to a paper towel, hands are covered in gore the type its hard to wash off without soap. He does not want to wipe his hands on his clothes (Potentially incriminating) so uses the apron. Wiping his hands as he runs, briskly walks off. He then casually chucks it in a dark entrance (I am I right in presuming that this was before public bins being ubiquitous?) pure coincidence it lands below some graffiti.

Hi Los
Maybe Jack wanted to put some distance between himself and Berner st after he murdered Liz and because he was interrupted he sought out another victim. He didn't want to head north towards Bucks Row or George yard, perhaps because he deemed it too risky having killed there before . So he headed west towards a second comfort zone [ as geographical profilers say ], possibly somewhere near he works and knows . Arguably using that place as a bolt hole especially if he saw a policeman nearby.

Regards Darryl

[Losmandris]

Just in terms of the murderer heading to a 'bolt hole' can someone explain why would he have supposedly done this? Why risk going back out onto the streets? To plant the apron and write the graffiti? Seems like planning to me? If so why something so subtle? If he had thought about doing this all along as posted earlier why not take Eddowes hat or something more obvious? And why is the apron smeared in blood? So he has wiped his hands/knife on it, taken it back with him waited for a bit then placed it later on after scrawling this non sensical/cryptic graffiti?

Too far a stretch for me. the apron is the closest thing he has to a paper towel, hands are covered in gore the type its hard to wash off without soap. He does not want to wipe his hands on his clothes (Potentially incriminating) so uses the apron. Wiping his hands as he runs, briskly walks off. He then casually chucks it in a dark entrance (I am I right in presuming that this was before public bins being ubiquitous?) pure coincidence it lands below some graffiti.

[Losmandris]

He was obviously returning to base and relative safety.

He decided to leave the apron piece somewhere as far away from the scene of the murder and as close to home as possible.

It takes a couple of minutes to get from Mitre Square to Goulston street, especially if you are running.

[Aethelwulf]

Although unusual, my feeling is that JtR could have been something of a communicator. It is interesting that there was chalk message at Hanbury Street claiming the third victim before there was any real precedent for ripper communications. I would class his potential communications as either boastful (e.g. dear boss, saucy jack) or confrontational, aimed at people that had annoyed him. That latter would include the From Hell to the head of the vigilance movement, and potentially the targeting (twice) of Albert Bachert. I would put the GSG in the annoyance/confrontation category owing to Schwartz.

Although not a communication, and considering he is generally written off as witness, I wonder about the part of Packer's story where he looked up from his work and found the man he'd sold the grapes to staring straight at him and thinking he was going to be stabbed. Perhaps this was part of his confrontation that is also echoed in the Bachert postcard (punch your bleedin nose). Perhaps other witnesses he couldn't track down or find their addresses.

[Aethelwulf]

[/COLOR]

Why is it different because it is in a stairwell?
If it bothers you - it bothers you, regardless where you see it.

Coincidentally, I saw an interview of two migrants yesterday, the second one Khalid came from Syria, his experience demonstrates what I was saying, that these people have experienced far worse so a little bit of racist scribble isn't going to bother him.

https://youtu.be/dGiNpkZKudM

Around 7.18 in this video the second migrant is asked about racist comments, he tells us that when he left Syria he went to Lebanon to a migrant camp, the locals objected and set the camp on fire, they wanted migrants gone, or dead.
Here in the UK when he faces racism he smiles, it's nothing more than like 'sticks & tones'. What was meant was that old rhyme "Sticks & stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me".
Which is precisely what I was saying, these foreigners (G.S. Jews) have put up with far worse than some infantile scribble, that doesn't really say anything abusive anyway. So, just ignore it, which is what I believe they did.
'Sheltered' white folk might think it should upset any Jews, but in the real world it means nothing. Warren & Arnold were the same, they overreacted in my view.


[/QUOTE]

We've had enough exchanges to know that you have no time for my opinion and vice versa. Let's leave it at that.

[Aethelwulf]

Hi Fiver,

There is also this, which is very direct to the point (from Day 2 of the Inquest; found in The Daily Telegraph, October 12, 1888):

...

Mr. Crawford: The theory has been put forward that it was possible for the deceased to have been murdered elsewhere, and her body brought to where it was found. I should like to ask Dr. Gordon Brown, who is present, what his opinion is about that.

Dr. Gordon Brown: I do not think there is any foundation for such a theory. The blood on the left side was clotted, and must have fallen at the time the throat was cut. I do not think that the deceased moved the least bit after that.

The Coroner: The body could not have been carried to where it was found? - Witness: Oh, no.

...

- Jeff

Also, if the argument is she was killed elsewhere, the cause of death was:

[Coroner] Can you tell us what was the cause of death? - The cause of death was haemorrhage from the throat. Death must have been immediate.

So she was moved with her throat cut and there is no blood anywhere between HSG's temporary surgery and square. Slight as she was it would take considerable strength to carry her outside. Her head would have been lolling about and there would be a blood trail. If she was dragged, similar. At the inquest no bruises were reported on her head, which is extremely unlikely if she'd been dragged across the flagstones. It was said bruises on her hands and shins were unconnected to the crime.