Eddowes Photograph

[Suzi]

Hi Phil,

Perhaps. I have trouble seeing these things. Naturally, I have horrible vision for my age.

LOL have vision (with mi specs!) at a horrible age!!!

Come in Chris S maybe...

[Suzi]

Hi Corey
Best I can do
....Rob'll do better I'm sure





Promise I didn't edit any letters out!!!

[corey123]

Hi Phil,

Perhaps. I have trouble seeing these things. Naturally, I have horrible vision for my age.

[Phil Carter]

Corey,

The letters on the side of the face are even visible on Chris Scotts cleaned up version of this photograph on another thread. I have no problem with seeing the ORIGINAL negative at all by the way.

Where is it?

best wishes

Phil

[corey123]

Hi Rob,

Can you post a hi-res photo for the rest of us? Even if Phil doesn't want to see it?


Thanks

[Suzi]

Rob,

here is a little clearer example. F, S, N O W all clear amongst others. I hope this helps.

best wishes

Phil

Clear?? - about as clear as mine below- is this some sort of weather forecast 1888

And of course we all missed the Vulcan bomber tattoo mid chest!!!...could there perhaps be a Baphomet there? Well maybe........

[Phil Carter]

Hello Rob. all,

Here is the mid section. Above the right nipple (note no areolae) R N
The mole is visible in the centre of the chest. (botoom right in this snippet) Above it, M.

best wishes

Phil

[Suzi]

This is Kate- no alphabet of any shape or form
involved

[ATTACH]8233[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]8234[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]8235[/ATTACH]

It's bad enough- like Mary- without spelling things out!!

[Phil Carter]

alphabet soup

Rob,

here is a little clearer example. F, S, N O W all clear amongst others. I hope this helps.

best wishes

Phil

[Rob Clack]

Hello Rob,

If I had the negative, I would..I can only do my best with what is on this site, which I have tried to do in many previous posts.

best wishes

Phil

What? Your only going by a poor low resolution copy which has faded and been badly handled for a hundred and twenty two years.
I think you should put a bit more thought into what you are posting before telling people to open there eyes.
There's no doubt in my mind that this is a photograph of Catherine Eddowes.

Rob

[DVV]

Phil, all,

I've just noticed something that tells me I was certainly wrong regarding the right cheek.

Comparing Eddowes "mutilated portrait" and "Eddowes body standing", it's pretty clear that the wound on the right cheek, visible on "Eddowes mutilated portrait", belongs in fact to the left cheek (both pics can be seen on the same page in Begg The Facts).

Note that in the portrait, the left eyebrow is clearly above the right one, whereas it is clearly the contrary in "Eddowes body standing".

Conclusion : Eddowes mutilated portrait is a reverted pic.
The wound I have been alluded to is therefore logically invisible in "Eddowes in the coffin".

Amitiés all,
David

[Suzi]

OK cheers Phil-
Not a letter in sight though IMHO- not even a F M x

[Phil Carter]

Suzi,

Post 55. Blow it up..zoom in..clear as daylight.

best wishes

Phil

[Suzi]

Perhaps you would like to post us a high resolution copy of the negative Phil, so we can see these pen markings for ourselves.

Rob

Let's see it 'eh Phil- have a go 'eh

[Phil Carter]

Hello Rob,

If I had the negative, I would..I can only do my best with what is on this site, which I have tried to do in many previous posts.

best wishes

Phil