Originally posted by David Orsam
View Post
The whole argument centers around the fact that could Tumblety have been bailed before his committal? Not the fact that bail was automatic after committal, because the only time period of interest is Nov7th -Nov 14th Lets take this a stage at a time and slowly. Becuase ehat happened or didnt happen bwteen those dates impacts on what happened between Nov14-16
You suggest he could have been bailed on his first court appearance on Nov 7th. But if bail at that stage was at the discretion of the magistrate what would be the grounds for that magistrate using his discretion and not granting bail on that date to Tumblety, In your reply lets stick with Tumblety because no two cases are the same so forget about any others and focus on this one solely.
Leave a comment: