Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tumblety and the British Press

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi All,

    Here's an [unnamed] Tumblety report from the Echo, Monday 3rd December 1888, the day after he arrived in New York and a week before the Old Bailey woke up to the fact he'd flown the coop.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ECHO 03 DEC 1888 TUMBLETY BUT NOT NAMED.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	46.8 KB
ID:	664057

    It's a pound to a penny that Chief Inspector Littlechild did not let this profile influence his 1913 letter.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Last edited by Simon Wood; 07-13-2012, 01:14 AM. Reason: spolling mistooks

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Mark,

    Wounderful find.

    Yours truly

    Leave a comment:


  • m_w_r
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Nice find. Well done.

    Maybe Littlechild read it.
    Hi Simon,

    Perhaps. But it's pretty obvious that he got his information about Tumblety, given in detail in his letter, out of the large dossier, held at Scotland Yard, to which he refers therein.

    Regards,

    Mark

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Mark,

    Nice find. Well done.

    Maybe Littlechild read it.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Originally posted by m_w_r View Post
    Hi,

    I'm not really up to speed with Tumblety, but I thought that this, from the Western Mail, published in Cardiff, Wales, on 20 November 1890, was interesting.

    [ATTACH]7784[/ATTACH]

    Obviously, this report originated in the USA, and was picked up by the Western Mail in their foreign correspondence section - it's not a disclosure by Scotland Yard, or anyone close to it. But it is an example of Tumblety's name being linked with the Ripper crimes in the pages of a British newspaper prior to 1993.

    Regards,

    Mark
    Awesome Mark! Previous arguments state that the British papers were completely silent about Tumblety (regardless of their source), while the U.S. papers were the ones pushing his suspect status (a great counter-argument to Tumblety). This demonstrates that they not only discussed Tumblety, they also discussed him as a JTR suspect, albeit only one tiny little article (but hey, if you find one cockroach, chances are there are dozens). I do have an honest question. If the British papers did indeed reject his suspect status, then why would this article be written at all?

    Sincerely,

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • m_w_r
    started a topic Tumblety and the British Press

    Tumblety and the British Press

    Hi,

    I'm not really up to speed with Tumblety, but I thought that this, from the Western Mail, published in Cardiff, Wales, on 20 November 1890, was interesting.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Western Mail, 20.11.1890.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	18.9 KB
ID:	669831

    Obviously, this report originated in the USA, and was picked up by the Western Mail in their foreign correspondence section - it's not a disclosure by Scotland Yard, or anyone close to it. But it is an example of Tumblety's name being linked with the Ripper crimes in the pages of a British newspaper prior to 1993.

    Regards,

    Mark
Working...
X