Originally posted by GBinOz
View Post
This story didn't appear until 1919 in a newspaper, just after White had died and conveniently was unable to deny it. Mysteriously, the same day another story appeared in another newspaper telling a similar tale, except that White narrowly missed seeing JtR. This has all of the hallmarks of journalistic invention.
It is supposed to be an extract from his official report but the language doesn't even slightly resemble anything a police officer would write, "nostrils rather delicate ... eyes ... like two luminous glow worms ... fingers long and tapering ... his voice was a surprise ... soft and musical with just a tinge of melancholy ...the sight made my blood turn to ice ... another of those terrible murders ... he was lost in the labyrinth of East End streets." No police report ever bore any resemblance to this rubbish.
All police reports must clearly state dates, times addresses and police officers' names etc, but this report totally avoids all necessary detail, "a certain alley" etc. White never had to attend an inquest, despite his involvement. It is impossible to identify which murder is allegedly being described from the information, because none of them accurately correspond to the information provided. He refers to the weather being "bitterly cold", but none of the murders occurred in winter. There are weird verb tenses involved suggesting that the piece was written not at the time, as it should have been, but much later, such as "had been watching" when "have been watching" would have been appropriate, then mysteriously inappropriate comments like "rubber shoes, which were rather rare in those days." That couldn't have been part of his report at the time. He said it was "bitter cold", but none of the murders took place in winter.
Then he wrote "I had no real grounds for connecting him with the murder", but what murder? At this point of the report the murder hadn't been discovered.
Then there are those detailed vacillations about whether or not to arrest him for looking suspicious. Why would he put that in a report?
The problems are endless. It has to be the work of a freelance journalist.
Leave a comment: