Maybrick Diary - Fake or Genuine

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Observer
    replied
    Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

    One moment the skeptic is having a cup of tea and a cinnamon bun, flicking idly through Dan Farson's Jack the Ripper (1971), when his eyes grab hold of it.

    It is obvious and unmistakable; the blood rushes to his head, the sky goes white, his entire world tilts.

    FM.

    Suddenly, it all makes sense. The anagrams. Diego Laurenz. JAmes MaybriCK.

    I once was lost but now am found
    was blind but now I see
    Indeed Mr Palmer. I remember many moons ago looking at that very image, and one thing struck me which few have mentioned. There, smack bang in the middle of the FM I definitely envisioned a capital T. It's hard to make out, but throws a new light on the birthplace of the Whitechapel fiend

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    Originally posted by Iconoclast View Post

    Somewhat obviously, RJ - but, man, he had ONE job!

    (By the way, when we’ve been there ten thousand years, it’ll still be Maybrick.)
    Hey, I'm a red blooded male. I can't multi-task, I was throwing darts at a photograph of Alan Shearer at the time

    Leave a comment:


  • Lombro2
    replied
    My one experience of jury duty, I was the lone holdout on two charges and I changed 11 jurors mind on one of them.

    One juror said he was an iconoclast. I wasn’t an iconoclast and that was around 2000. I was a Maybrickian and no one can say I was iconoclastic and had an agenda.

    I may be iconoclastic now but it makes no difference with Maybrick. With the man charged in my case, I regret not being more lenient on him and not siding with the police on all charges.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by Lombro2 View Post
    I guess so. Otherwise we’d all have to be unanimous. Right?
    Can some of us be unanimous, Lombro?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lombro2
    replied
    I guess so. Otherwise we’d all have to be unanimous. Right?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lewis C
    replied
    Originally posted by Lombro2 View Post
    Yeah. They also send tens of thousands of innocent people to jail every century.
    In that case, I guess it's for the best that the participants in this poll aren't a jury.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post
    Either that, or Observer tapped on the wrong button.
    Somewhat obviously, RJ - but, man, he had ONE job!

    (By the way, when we’ve been there ten thousand years, it’ll still be Maybrick.)

    Leave a comment:


  • rjpalmer
    replied
    Either that, or Observer tapped on the wrong button.

    Leave a comment:


  • rjpalmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Iconoclast View Post

    I sense those that think Maybrick was the Ripper are getting more and more.

    Even Observer's come over to the cause.
    Indeed, Ike. After 30+ years of skepticism, the tide has turned.

    The conversion comes quickly--similar to when the apostle Paul was struck blind on the road to Damascus.

    One moment the skeptic is having a cup of tea and a cinnamon bun, flicking idly through Dan Farson's Jack the Ripper (1971), when his eyes grab hold of it.

    It is obvious and unmistakable; the blood rushes to his head, the sky goes white, his entire world tilts.

    FM.

    Suddenly, it all makes sense. The anagrams. Diego Laurenz. JAmes MaybriCK.

    I once was lost but now am found
    was blind but now I see

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    I sense those that think Maybrick was the Ripper are getting more and more desperate.
    I sense those that think Maybrick was the Ripper are getting more and more.

    Even Observer's come over to the cause.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    I sense those that think Maybrick was the Ripper are getting more and more desperate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by Lombro2 View Post
    So if you vote, we automatically win and they can’t talk ever again. Them’s the rules we agreed on.
    Let them have their fun. We stoics can afford them that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    I thought not

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    There is no way on God’s good earth that Observer meant to vote ‘Genuine’.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    I can only assume that an error has been made because one of the two votes for genuine has come from someone who has until very recently been someone who believes the diary to be a fake

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X