The Diary — Old Hoax or New or Not a Hoax at All?​

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rjpalmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Lombro2 View Post

    Thank you, Paddy.

    Surviving Diariist and MJWilsonist.

    MJ Wilson?

    I guess if Hammersmith can be Bridge, Druitt can be Wilson.

    Strange times.

    RP

    Leave a comment:


  • rjpalmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Lombro2 View Post


    Thank you, Paddy.

    Surviving Diariist and MJWilsonist.

    MJ Wilson?

    Well, I guess if Hammersmith can be Bridge, Druitt can be Wilson.

    RP

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Bias, obsession, bluster, ego and agenda. Nothing more from #870 and #871.

    The diary is a proven modern forgery.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lombro2
    replied
    Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post
    I have no issues with 'the Ripper' being a businessman or a toff. I doubt that Herlock does either; as long as I can remember, he's leaned towards a certain Oxford graduate and barrister, and that qualifies as a 'toff.'
    Well, your name has nothing to do with the banking industry.

    Based on the letter M, Monty was my working suspect until Maybrick came along. So "initially" I was wrong but for the right reasons.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by Lombro2 View Post
    When does jury selection start? I think Ike approves me and Jay and Scott.

    What does Maybrick's Legal Dream Team say?
    I think we have some genuine concerns regarding the ability of the vast majority of posters on the Casebook to know what the **** they're talking about where the Maybrick scrapbook is concerned. I wouldn't trust them to organise a piss-up in a brewery never mind pass comment on the solution to the whole effing debate.

    Obviously, we'll rephrase it in legalese for the courtroom.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X