Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michael Barrett an Author?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUT
    replied
    G'day Caz

    Thanks I could not find it anywhere. But I'm useless.

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Hi GUT,

    Here is a timely link to that recent watch conversation for you:

    http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=7981&page=12

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    Last edited by caz; 04-04-2014, 03:22 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'day Caz

    I've answered your question about the watch on a different thread.

    I'm a real diaryt newbie and I can't find that thread, any pointers on the watch, I think it is more interesting than the diary, because of the scientific findings.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'day Caz

    I do recall one particularly hilarious example of Mike's efforts to get his work published. It was an 'adult' riddle, along the lines of 'my first is in ... but not in ...' and so on, using naughty clues to make up a very naughty word. Only trouble was, the solution was meant to be 'orgasm', but he gave eight clues which spelled out 'organism'.
    Thanks Caz that was something that took my attention why Mike called himself an author in his affidavit.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post
    Hi Jonathan,

    I'm surprised at your impatience and your demands to be handed answers on a plate, considering you are never, ever, going to lose your faith in a modern hoax with Mike "couldn't forge a sick note" Barrett's active involvement.

    I don't really know why I should be civil to you, but I'm feeling generous and it's Friday.

    I understood from my co-author Keith Skinner many years ago that the reputable document examiner Sue Iremonger had been provided with various handwriting samples (including Maybrick's, Mike's and Anne's) very early on, and she determined that the writing in the diary did not match the Maybrick samples. I presume she found no more of a resemblance with the Barrett samples because she did not say otherwise, and nobody has ever suggested the remotest likeness there. In fact, I would say it is downright impossible for Mike to have handwritten the diary because he has consistently proved himself a stranger to cursive writing, and his uPPeR AnD loweR cAse leTTeRs are all over the shop. Hard to believe it could have been a cunning double bluff on his part, going back to when he was trying to get stuff published.

    I do recall one particularly hilarious example of Mike's efforts to get his work published. It was an 'adult' riddle, along the lines of 'my first is in ... but not in ...' and so on, using naughty clues to make up a very naughty word. Only trouble was, the solution was meant to be 'orgasm', but he gave eight clues which spelled out 'organism'. The bloke's a pillock - but an entertaining one. And I'd much sooner go for a drink with him than with some stuffed shirt who has been taken in by this pillock, hook, line and sinker.

    I've answered your question about the watch on a different thread.

    You're welcome.

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    Hi caz,it's very easy for people to say Mike Barrett is capable of forging I thought that myself untill I met him and its impossible not to come away thinking this man is only just able to dress himself in the morning so how can he forge anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Originally posted by Jonathan H View Post
    Ok, so you don't know the answers to some basic questions about the 'Diary'.

    You can be as rude as you like about it, but that's the answer to my question--you know phuck all.

    In that case don't ever write on this topic again you shameless, despicable fraud.

    Now is there anybody else in the 'Diary' camp who can answer these basic questions? What handwriting tests were done, and who by--specifically. What is the source for the watch appearing before the 'book'?
    Hi Jonathan,

    I'm surprised at your impatience and your demands to be handed answers on a plate, considering you are never, ever, going to lose your faith in a modern hoax with Mike "couldn't forge a sick note" Barrett's active involvement.

    I don't really know why I should be civil to you, but I'm feeling generous and it's Friday.

    I understood from my co-author Keith Skinner many years ago that the reputable document examiner Sue Iremonger had been provided with various handwriting samples (including Maybrick's, Mike's and Anne's) very early on, and she determined that the writing in the diary did not match the Maybrick samples. I presume she found no more of a resemblance with the Barrett samples because she did not say otherwise, and nobody has ever suggested the remotest likeness there. In fact, I would say it is downright impossible for Mike to have handwritten the diary because he has consistently proved himself a stranger to cursive writing, and his uPPeR AnD loweR cAse leTTeRs are all over the shop. Hard to believe it could have been a cunning double bluff on his part, going back to when he was trying to get stuff published.

    I do recall one particularly hilarious example of Mike's efforts to get his work published. It was an 'adult' riddle, along the lines of 'my first is in ... but not in ...' and so on, using naughty clues to make up a very naughty word. Only trouble was, the solution was meant to be 'orgasm', but he gave eight clues which spelled out 'organism'. The bloke's a pillock - but an entertaining one. And I'd much sooner go for a drink with him than with some stuffed shirt who has been taken in by this pillock, hook, line and sinker.

    I've answered your question about the watch on a different thread.

    You're welcome.

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    Last edited by caz; 03-28-2014, 07:19 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kaz
    replied
    Originally posted by Jonathan H View Post
    Ok, so you don't know the answers to some basic questions about the 'Diary'.

    You can be as rude as you like about it, but that's the answer to my question--you know phuck all.

    In that case don't ever write on this topic again you shameless, despicable fraud.

    Now is there anybody else in the 'Diary' camp who can answer these basic questions? What handwriting tests were done, and who by--specifically. What is the source for the watch appearing before the 'book'?



    Yea, we're all frauds here, its all a big conspiracy against the little 'jonnyboy', poor poor soul.....


    Leave a comment:


  • Jonathan H
    replied
    Ok, so you don't know the answers to some basic questions about the 'Diary'.

    You can be as rude as you like about it, but that's the answer to my question--you know phuck all.

    In that case don't ever write on this topic again you shameless, despicable fraud.

    Now is there anybody else in the 'Diary' camp who can answer these basic questions? What handwriting tests were done, and who by--specifically. What is the source for the watch appearing before the 'book'?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kaz
    replied
    Originally posted by Jonathan H View Post
    ... And Feldman's 'proof' of handwriting comparisons is what, and by whom?

    Do some detective work yourself jonny, find his little book and get back to us with your work

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonathan H
    replied
    ... And Feldman's 'proof' of handwriting comparisons is what, and by whom?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kaz
    replied
    Originally posted by Jonathan H View Post
    I never used the word 'fake'. I was asking for information which must be somewhere on the public record.

    So that's a 'no' and a Get Phucked.

    And it took less than an hour ...


    I just think its ironic how you consider barrett capable of "masterminding" this whole thing.

    And yet you consider Feldmans 'proof' of handwriting comparisons, suspicious.....


    Ok


    Yea, get phucked with that logic

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    We need to remember that Mr Barrett said that he authored the diary and Anne wrote it, [at least that's what he said in his affidavit]. Purely from memory he said that this was because his was too distinctive.

    So a sample of his handwriting gets us nowhere.
    Hi gut,very hard to take anything Mr Barrett says seriously he has told me a lot of obviously tall stories the man is a fruitloop.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonathan H
    replied
    I never used the word 'fake'. I was asking for information which must be somewhere on the public record.

    So that's a 'no' and a Get Phucked.

    And it took less than an hour ...

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    We need to remember that Mr Barrett said that he authored the diary and Anne wrote it, [at least that's what he said in his affidavit]. Purely from memory he said that this was because his was too distinctive.

    So a sample of his handwriting gets us nowhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kaz
    replied
    I take it Hannah koren wouldn't get the from you?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X